Jump to content
music news

Harry Styles Self-Titled Metacritic score debut


Thomas P

Featured Posts

Thomas P
20 minutes ago, monsterdino said:

let's not jump the gun now...the album is good don't get me wrong, but I think that we are more impressed that that's Harry than we are with the music. 

No I'm actually genuinely impressed with the music. I've always been impressed with Harry even in his 1D days, but this album is my favourite thing released since Lemonade.

I’m a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Levine

As long as american critics heard a slow song and an album full of those, they scream at quality lol you people are so funny. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thomas P
1 minute ago, Levine said:

As long as american critics heard a slow song and an album full of those, they scream at quality lol you people are so funny. 

This album isn't full of slow songs lol. Have you listened to it? There are more upbeat hard hitting songs than on Joanne.

I’m a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill.
Link to post
Share on other sites

911

I dont like his album, it's way to boring to me, however I'm happy that he got a good score! 

𝕞𝕪 𝕓𝕚𝕘𝕘𝕖𝕤𝕥 𝕖𝕟𝕖𝕞𝕪 𝕚𝕤 𝕞𝕖, 𝕡𝕠𝕡 𝕒 𝟡𝟙𝟙
Link to post
Share on other sites

littlepotter
24 minutes ago, monsterdino said:

let's not jump the gun now...the album is good don't get me wrong, but I think that we are more impressed that that's Harry than we are with the music. 

Like the album but spill that T

chaeri pls
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thomas P
7 minutes ago, ARTnFAME said:

I dont like his album, it's way to boring to me, however I'm happy that he got a good score! 

This is completely off topic, but can I just say that your self promo with that Avi has payed off. It's officially my favourite on the site.

I’m a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill.
Link to post
Share on other sites

JR Gg
22 minutes ago, IAmDavid said:

I actually think that Metacritic is a lot better than the grammys :rip:  Btw Revival is a pretty good pop album. Imo it's better than Joanne

Hunnyyou'vegotabigstormcomin'.gif :staymad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

911
16 minutes ago, Thomas P said:

This is completely off topic, but can I just say that your self promo with that Avi has payed off. It's officially my favourite on the site.

:rip:

I said that Im happy for him, where is the off topic? Where did I promote myself? 

𝕞𝕪 𝕓𝕚𝕘𝕘𝕖𝕤𝕥 𝕖𝕟𝕖𝕞𝕪 𝕚𝕤 𝕞𝕖, 𝕡𝕠𝕡 𝕒 𝟡𝟙𝟙
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thomas P
2 minutes ago, ARTnFAME said:

:rip:

I said that Im happy for him, where is the off topic? Where did I promote myself? 

I meant I  was being off topic by mentioning it lol. Cuz in threads that that are completely illogical you post a pic of your avi. 

You did nothing here, I just wanted to tell you I liked it lol. 

RIP myself.

I’m a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quark
1 hour ago, Bradley said:

Metacritic rated Revival '74' and Adele's 25 '75'.

I don't know why you all take their scores seriously.

Do people seriously consider Selena Gomez'z Revival to be on the same level as Adele's 25?

I mean Joanne and ARTPOP both have lower scores than Selena Gomez's albums and we know the Grammys would pick Gaga over Gomez anyday.

It's all relative to each artist though. For example revival may have been a big improvement for Selena even though is not better than Joanne. Critics almost always look at the artists previous efforts and review their current albums with that perspective. So basically these scores are not weighted equally for everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradley
1 hour ago, monsterdino said:

lol, it's not like Adele's 25 was that good

Far better than Revival.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradley
1 hour ago, Harry said:

But who decides what is acclaimed? Who decides what is mediocre? It's all arbitrary, really. Metacritic doesn't always reflect the general consensus of quality, neither do the Grammys. It's all just for bragging rights, really.

A member of the Grammy once said 'What we do isn't easy. We're judging something that is intrinsically subjective in nature with objective standards.'

There is still some level of objectivity on what is considered 'great music' in the industry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

monsterdino
2 minutes ago, Bradley said:

Far better than Revival.

not really both are mediocre, it's just that people have more respect for Adele than Selena...and that intstantly makes ppl think that Adele has better albums than someone like Selena

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradley
1 hour ago, IAmDavid said:

I actually think that Metacritic is a lot better than the grammys :rip:  Btw Revival is a pretty good pop album. Imo it's better than Joanne

I wouldn't try to change your mind but I would think the opposite. I'm not deeming Grammys to be the absolute conclusive determiner either, but there's a reason why Selena hasn't won a Grammy, whereas Britney hasn't even been nominated for years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradley
25 minutes ago, E Nigma said:

It's all relative to each artist though. For example revival may have been a big improvement for Selena even though is not better than Joanne. Critics almost always look at the artists previous efforts and review their current albums with that perspective. So basically these scores are not weighted equally for everyone.

Which is why Metacritic can reward bad music with a high score if it marks an improvement for the artist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...