AM98GJ 3,086 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 46 minutes ago, androiduser said: Pure typical natural born Brit You're disgusting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeehawKylie 7,817 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 1 hour ago, androiduser said: Pure typical natural born Brit Briton's, like most other nationalities, are not defined by a single race. For hundreds of years we've been living in multicultural societies. Saying he can't be a 'pure' Brit based off a photo is very tactless, in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
androiduser 7,438 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 3 hours ago, AM98GJ said: You're disgusting I'm disgusting because the photo shows someone who would immediately be recognized as an immigrant or the child of immigrants, and just so happens to be a terrorist Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
androiduser 7,438 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 2 hours ago, IndieKylie said: Briton's, like most other nationalities, are not defined by a single race. For hundreds of years we've been living in multicultural societies. Saying he can't be a 'pure' Brit based off a photo is very tactless, in my opinion. then why is he not of Chinese origin, Japanese, Korean, Swedish, Icelandic, etc.... why are these European citizens who organize terrorist attacks all of the same origin lately? His name sounded British so it was okay to post it here as proof of his European tradition, but it's not okay to show a photo that shows something else? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeehawKylie 7,817 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 6 minutes ago, androiduser said: then why is he not of Chinese origin, Japanese, Korean, Swedish, Icelandic, etc.... why are these European citizens who organize terrorist attacks all of the same origin lately? His name sounded British so it was okay to post it here as proof of his European tradition, but it's not okay to show a photo that shows something else? I don't quite get what you're saying in the first paragraph, but if you clarify/break it down I'm happy to respond. In regard to your second paragraph, you're still relating skin color to nationality. The U.K. has been multicultural for a while and, many varying parts of the world are still under the Commonwealth. Just because he's of a darker skin tone doesn't mean he's first or second generation Briton. His family could be there just as long if not longer than light skinned Briton's. That's the point people are making here, race does not equate nationality in most parts of the world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 5 minutes ago, androiduser said: I'm disgusting because the photo shows someone who would immediately be recognized as an immigrant or the child of immigrants, and just so happens to be a terrorist That is your own ignorance talking. He was Briton born in Kent. Same as Nigel Farage. If a black guy with British accent comes to talk to you, would you ask him "but where are you REALLY from? You can't be Brit, you aren't white?" 🤦♀️ That's how you sound like. What are you suggesting? To go through his lineage and to locate who he had in family, who's non-white so all the immigrants of that ethnicity would be expelled? Is that what you are saying? 7 minutes ago, androiduser said: then why is he not of Chinese origin, Japanese, Korean, Swedish, Icelandic, etc.... why are these European citizens who organize terrorist attacks all of the same origin lately? His name sounded British so it was okay to post it here as proof of his European tradition, but it's not okay to show a photo that shows something else? They aren't?? The photo and your comment is only showing your ignorance, nothing else. FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 ....described as a 'bright' student and an outstanding footballer who had no interest in religion and 'liked to party'. And it was revealed he blamed racism in his village when he slashed a cafe owner across the face with a knife in 2000 after a night drinking in his local pub. Born Adrian Russell Elms on Christmas Day, 1964, his birth certificate gives his single mother's name as Janet Elms, a 17-year-old office worker from Croydon in South London. .... 'He wasn't religious at all. .... He might have been the only black kid at the school. He experienced a little bit of racism but not a lot because he always tried to be popular. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4345016/London-terror-Kent-boy-Adrian-terorrist-Khalid.html#article-4345016 FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.