BREAKING: WH releases Trump tax info. from 2005

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

38 minutes ago, Stef said:

TWH out here sounding like stan twitter  

I love it All the drama is making politics so much more interesting!

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

So there was nothing bad in his tax returns? Great job Rachel, overhyping, giving MSNBC a bad name.

[FATCAT 60,978]

Just now, Gaga Monster said:

So there was nothing bad in his tax returns? Great job Rachel, overhyping, giving MSNBC a bad name.

You obviously didn't watch the report, or read up on the articles they've posted on her website as well as the original reporting for whom the returns were left for. This is not sizable, no, but it's the implications that this seaming release make that are damning. 

[FATCAT 60,978]

MSNBC's coverage of his returns was completely legal. The White House and Donald Trump need to read their handy-dandy pocket constitution.

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

Just now, FATCAT said:

You obviously didn't watch the report, or read up on the articles they've posted on her website as well as the original reporting for whom the returns were left for. This is not sizable, no, but it's the implications that this seaming release make that are damning. 

No I didnt watch the report, I plan on watching it tomorrow. I just saw that he paid $35 million in taxes, nothing bad that I saw yet. What bad was in the tax returns, just curious?

[FATCAT 60,978]

6 minutes ago, Gaga Monster said:

No I didnt watch the report, I plan on watching it tomorrow. I just saw that he paid $35 million in taxes, nothing bad that I saw yet. What bad was in the tax returns, just curious?

I outlined the returns importance in the original MSNBC thread, page 2.

[DeleteMyAccount 11,881]

1 minute ago, Gaga Monster said:

No I didnt watch the report, I plan on watching it tomorrow. I just saw that he paid $35 million in taxes, nothing bad that I saw yet. What bad was in the tax returns, just curious?

There was only part of the tax returns leaked. The sources of Trump's income was a key talking point. But overall the discussion still remains to be the fact that Trump doesn't want his full tax returns to be released. He even lied about the auditing process. 

Additional reporting included other Russian connections including Russians with close ties to Trump who bought his properties as well as Russian ships and planes parked next to Trump at his rallies.

So we're still at square one I guess. But what Rachel did was important: keep Americans on their toes. There's so much wrongdoing that people blindly overlook.

Also, the NYT already revealed that Trump paid little taxes over 10 years due to bankruptcy filing and whatnot, but we all know that Trump is a smart business man... And he still one the election.

I'm just hoping that next time there is a leak, it'll at least have some damning information about Trump and/or his admin.

[Zilla 13,466]

Not the bombshell I was hoping for but when one water drop drips, there has to be quite a few behind. 

There's something there and you have to admit that there is something that he's hiding. If there wasn't, he would release them no problem. 

As long as the media keeps on Trump's toes and don't let up I will be content. Don't let him win

[hausofkc 2,530]

Trump leaked this. I don't care what anyone says. The journalist who received the leak said it randomly was put into his mailbox and said to report it with no sender/source. How ironic that tomorrow is the Comey hearing. He literally picked one year that he did defend and "leaked" it to get people's mind off the whole mess. 

[ItsTommyBitch 12,640]

This is a red herring I think (though I'm still sure theres something worth hiding in his tax returns  ) and we should focus on Comey and other things in the next days.

 

[JusKeepBreathin 19,311]

It's a plant to keep focus off what's really happening.

[Shadow 6,707]

31 minutes ago, hausofkc said:

Trump leaked this. I don't care what anyone says. The journalist who received the leak said it randomly was put into his mailbox and said to report it with no sender/source. How ironic that tomorrow is the Comey hearing. He literally picked one year that he did defend and "leaked" it to get people's mind off the whole mess. 

 

18 minutes ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

This is a red herring I think (though I'm still sure theres something worth hiding in his tax returns  ) and we should focus on Comey and other things in the next days.

 

 

12 minutes ago, JustLikeHoney said:

It's a plant to keep focus off what's really happening.

Yeah, it is looking more like misdirection, like picking this arbitrary year, 2005, to report. Perhaps, something more damning might come from the Comey hearings as mentioned 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/14/politics/wiretapping-congressional-investigation/

Ironically, Trump would be the desperate one if this and allegations prove to be true. 

 

[Popo 3,781]

3 hours ago, ZarinStar said:

So back to the topic, does this mean Trump payed taxes in 2005? What about the other years, are those not allowed to be released? 

Still doesn't show where he got his money from considering it's only two pages. The whitehouse could be the ones who leaked it in the first place as someone only leaked two pages to the media.

[skaxboy 7,085]

I feel this is a decoy so he can say "there, see, I paid taxes now get off my case."

 

lets wait to see 2006-2016. I'm betting that he paid minimum taxes those years. Or he's probably just not as rich as he says.