brizoda 4,176 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 27 minutes ago, Reginald said: Lol @ everyone who thinks Jill somehow influenced Trump' s win... Gary Johnson got three times as many votes as Jill, so by this very broken logic, his influence was greater in "supporting" Hillary than Jill was, to Trump. Additionally, third party voters generally don't vote for the elite parties, so there was never a vote to lose. Votes are earned, not entitled. This thinking is how we end up with such corrupt politicians. Oh yeah, and there's the fact that neither Jill or Gary got a single electoral college point, so... yeah.... On topic: kudos to Jill for bringing the fight for fair democracy to the limelight I only hope this money is not from Soros Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo 4,410 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Donated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsTommyBitch 12,640 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 7 hours ago, Azor Ahai said: Libertarians are just anti-state, they lean towards the right. Found this 2012 political compass but you can still see the major differences between the Green and Libertarian parties. That doesn't do a good enough job of breaking down the different categories... http://www.ontheissues.org/VoteMatch/candidate_map.asp?a1=2&a2=3&a3=1&a4=3&a9=5&a16=2&a10=1&a5=2&a7=4&a8=1&a14=5&a15=1&a17=1&a19=4&a18=5&a6=4&a20=1&a11=4&a12=5&a13=5&i1=1&i2=1&i3=1&i4=1&p=75&e=83&t=25 The rejection of the state's intervention also means in social issues (which puts them closer to liberals than conservatives) 私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azor Ahai 18,861 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 46 minutes ago, ItsTommyBitch said: That doesn't do a good enough job of breaking down the different categories... http://www.ontheissues.org/VoteMatch/candidate_map.asp?a1=2&a2=3&a3=1&a4=3&a9=5&a16=2&a10=1&a5=2&a7=4&a8=1&a14=5&a15=1&a17=1&a19=4&a18=5&a6=4&a20=1&a11=4&a12=5&a13=5&i1=1&i2=1&i3=1&i4=1&p=75&e=83&t=25 The rejection of the state's intervention also means in social issues (which puts them closer to liberals than conservatives) Your diagram is completely wrong. Why is even populist a category? What political ideology alligns with populism? Left ? Right? Pro-state? Against state? Where do communists even go on that diagram? Or any anticapitalist ideology for that matter, lol? And no Libertarians are NOT closer to liberals on social issues. They are pro-gay right only because they are pro-everything. They dont plan to help gay people by any means (like laws and state) they just don't care if they get married or not. They want to privitize prisons and pretty much everything there is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaperIz 7,354 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 20 hours ago, Simon said: Jill is one of the reasons trump won Hillary* Human generated art Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsTommyBitch 12,640 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 13 minutes ago, Azor Ahai said: Your diagram is completely wrong. Why is even populist a category? What political ideology alligns with populism? Left ? Right? Pro-state? Against state? Where do communists even go on that diagram? Or any anticapitalist ideology for that matter, lol? And no Libertarians are NOT closer to liberals on social issues. They are pro-gay right only because they are pro-everything. They dont plan to help gay people by any means (like laws and state) they just don't care if they get married or not. They want to privitize prisons and pretty much everything there is. Different political compasses have different uses... We're talking about different axes entirely. My point is that there is more than general ideology at stake in how people vote, social and economic issues are part of that, so its not completely unreasonable that Gary Johnson supporters and Jill Stein supporters could both vote for Hillary. I'd also reason that not even most independents that vote 3rd party in America have strong ideological ties to either parties, they just see it as an issue by issue thing or dissatisfaction at the two party option, disregarding how far left or right things might be. 私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayla 7,595 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 21 hours ago, Misaki said: I really do hope the Clinton team calls for a recall, in her whole campain she wanted to bring everyone together and not use fear and hate. She should call for a recall if she really wanted those things as said in her campain. If she calls for a recall and ends up winning, people will say she rigged it. She got put in this position where if she wins, it's because "the system is rigged." And it's a completely Republican Congress, so even if she wins it'll be hell for her. Instead she lost, despite having 2 million votes MORE than Trump, in this "rigged" system they were so concerned about.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayla 7,595 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 19 hours ago, kupo said: Oh, absolutely. If Hillary thought there was even the slimmest shot in hell that this would do anything, her people would have been on it from the start. But she just "lost" in the wrong places this year--the demographics were brutal to her and the Dems. As I said, this is ultimately a good thing not because it will remove Donald Trump from the presidency (in our dreams), but because, as a country and an electorate, we deserve a fair, transparent, and secure election process, and this recount helps assure us just that. Very good point. I actually believe counting the votes twice should be required. We're told "doublecheck your work!" before turning in an 8th grade math test but not before announcing who's the next President? Sure, it would take longer, but why not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion Heart 15,041 Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 New goal set at 7 Million Right now: 5.1M/ 7M Because of you, recounts in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are funded! Next up is Michigan. Congratulations on meeting the recount costs for Wisconsin and Pennsylvania! Raising money to pay for the first two recounts so quickly is a miraculous feat and a tribute to the power of grassroots organizing. Now that we have completed funding Wisconsin's recount (where we will file on Friday) and funding Pennsylvania's recount (due Monday), we will focus on raising the needed funds for Michigan's recount (due Wednesday). The breakdown of these costs is described below! On November 23, the Stein/Baraka Green Party Campaign launched an effort to ensure the integrity of our elections. With your help, we are raising money to demand recounts in these three states where the data suggests a significant need to verify machine-counted vote totals. In true grassroots fashion, we’re turning to you, the people, and not big-money corporate donors to make this happen. Your immediate support is crucial - Please donate now and share widely. https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.