Clinton And Isis Funded By The Same Money

[manicholic 3,694]

2 minutes ago, gagu said:

Basically America is screwed either way.

Actually it's really not.

[DeleteMyAccount 11,881]

11 minutes ago, kyanewest said:

I'm honestly so done with this forum and how you can't share anything or even speak your mind, really thinking of leaving

 I think people are just tired of this guy. He keeps throwing "accusations" out and even says that she'll win the presidency. If there was real dirt on Hillary he would've thrown it all out by now. And the header is also misleading. What does that mean? The USA spends money on lots of things related to improving the lives of Americans but at the same time uses money to wage war. I have a dollar that has a stamp from the NRA on it, yet it doesn't mean the money is going to the same place. Unless Hillary herself told someone in the ME to fund ISIS I don't think there's much else to say. 

And I think you should expect opposition when posting about anti-Hillary articles. Especially when it's "accusations". NO ONE is saying you can't share or speak your mind. 

[Nagini 4,166]

another day, another load of crap 

if you actually believe the deliberately misguided+ uninformed+ illogical connection he's trying to make, i feel sorry for you 

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said:

 I think people are just tired of this guy. He keeps throwing "accusations" out and even says that she'll win the presidency. If there was real dirt on Hillary he would've thrown it all out by now. And the header is also misleading. What does that mean? The USA spends money on lots of things related to improving the lives of Americans but at the same time uses money to wage war. I have a dollar that has a stamp from the NRA on it, yet it doesn't mean the money is going to the same place. Unless Hillary herself told someone in the ME to fund ISIS I don't think there's much else to say. 

And I think you should expect opposition when posting about anti-Hillary articles. Especially when it's "accusations". NO ONE is saying you can't share or speak your mind. 

Somebody called me a Trump supporter that's why, and I've posted other things before and got backlash cause it's not in accordance to their opinion which is childish. And I think the fact that Hillary is being investigated by the FBI didn't come out of thin air

[Reginald 13,841]

25 minutes ago, Halsey said:

Can we please perma ban these Trumo supporters @Haroon

Just because someone doesn't support Hillary, doesn't mean they support Trump. It's pretty clear that the OP has the ability to see both sides of a very flawed political cycle. 

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Reginald said:

Just because someone doesn't support Hillary, doesn't mean they support Trump. It's pretty clear that the OP has the ability to see both sides of a very flawed political cycle. 

Thank you, somebody with some common sense here

[manicholic 3,694]

11 minutes ago, kyanewest said:

I'm honestly so done with this forum and how you can't share anything or even speak your mind, really thinking of leaving

Your idea of speaking your mind is posting an Inquistr article written by an Angela Cheng-level blogger about a segment on Putin's RT network with the headline featuring Trump's current propaganda of "rigged" election to counter in advance of his predicted loss on November 8th / to launch Trump TV?

Then I think Gaga was right: free speech is overrated. 

If you really want to support and perpetuate conspiracy theories where 'sources' like Assange continues to come up short when it comes to real actual facts to base them upon, Breitbart.com or Alex Jone's YouTube channel says hi. 

[DeleteMyAccount 11,881]

Just now, kyanewest said:

Somebody called me a Trump supporter that's why, and I've posted other things before and got backlash cause it's not in accordance to their opinion which is childish. And I think the fact that Hillary is being investigated by the FBI didn't come out of thin air

Again, that's just politics. Getting backlash is going to happen on this site, especially when most people are pro-Clinton. The FBI has nothing to do with this thread. We are talking about a man who has "accusations" about Clinton. But if we are going to talk about the FBI, we should be talking about how Rudy Giuliani was given leaked info from the FBI regarding Clinton's emails. He is now backtracking.

[Guest]

Just now, manicholic said:

Your idea of speaking your mind is posting an Inquistr article written by an Angela Cheng-level blogger about a segment on Putin's RT network with the headline featuring Trump's current propaganda of "rigged" election to counter in advance of his predicted loss on November 8th / to launch Trump TV?

Then I think Gaga was right: free speech is overrated. 

If you really want to support and perpetuate conspiracy theories where 'sources' like Assange continues to come up short when it comes to real actual facts to base them upon, Breitbart.com or Alex Jone's YouTube channel says hi. 

I said "can't share anything or speak my mind" of course when I share something I don't speak my mind, I share somebody else's mind. If you don't agree with an article, fine, say how you feel about it, speak your mind but don't attack me about it when I've done nothing to you. If you're mad about this article, be mad about it not the one who shares it? And if you meant that I should not be sharing it because you don't agree with it, well then welcome to the real world where people can do whatever the fck they want whether you want it or not.

[Guest]

Just now, ZacharyMark said:

Again, that's just politics. Getting backlash is going to happen on this site, especially when most people are pro-Clinton. The FBI has nothing to do with this thread. We are talking about a man who has "accusations" about Clinton. But if we are going to talk about the FBI, we should be talking about how Rudy Giuliani was given leaked info from the FBI regarding Clinton's emails. He is now backtracking.

It's a man who leaked Clinton's emails and if you watched the video they show an extract of an email where there's proof of his claim. Again, if you don't agree with it, I'm happy that you're being civilised and well mannered which is something a lot of people in this forum lack.

[gagu 1,928]

20 minutes ago, manicholic said:

Actually it's really not.

Well every day something bad about both of them comes out, I'm not into conspiracies but who knows what serious sh*t might have happened and hidden. How people can be so sure about a candidate they're going to vote, there's so much confusion, tons of informations are manipulated by media.. How can you tell "this is true" and "this is false"? 

[DeleteMyAccount 11,881]

7 minutes ago, kyanewest said:

It's a man who leaked Clinton's emails and if you watched the video they show an extract of an email where there's proof of his claim. Again, if you don't agree with it, I'm happy that you're being civilised and well mannered which is something a lot of people in this forum lack.

But what does that claim mean? That Hillary is a terrorist? Giving out money is a vague action in these cases like I said in my earlier post. 

[Whispering 18,865]

18 minutes ago, Reginald said:

Just because someone doesn't support Hillary, doesn't mean they support Trump. It's pretty clear that the OP has the ability to see both sides of a very flawed political cycle. 

The OP is bringing over conspiracy theory type articles from sites that no legitimate news source would consider believable. There is a difference between being a person that supports Trump and someone who believes crazy  Alex Jones infowars information. 

 

[Whispering 18,865]

11 minutes ago, gagu said:

Well every day something bad about both of them comes out, I'm not into conspiracies but who knows what serious sh*t might have happened and hidden. How people can be so sure about a candidate they're going to vote, there's so much confusion, tons of informations are manipulated by media.. How can you tell "this is true" and "this is false"? 

Common sense goes a long way. 

[Guest]

3 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said:

But what does that claim mean? That Hillary is a terrorist? Giving out money is a vague action in these cases like I said in my earlier post. 

To sell influence, intel, favors, weapons and people to anyone willing to pay. It's especially true if you look into the Clinton Foundation, I don't pull this outta my a s s , but some Clinton supporters choose to ignore it.