SEXODUS 5,927 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 This kind of professionalism always kind of amazes me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PI Floppedt 904 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 He literally just threw a heap of dirt at his own credibility as a writer right there. It is because of this that I'd rather laugh at his stupidity than get mad at him trying to tear Gaga down. I don't actually hate PI Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanta 5,019 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Something tells me the more attention these critics get the better it is for their job. Since he's begging for the attention he clearly wants NYT-level backlash to bring attention to his sad review. I didn't believe it but it truly seems like the current trend. How professional. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 29 minutes ago, Sycamore said: He admitted to it. His Tweets still exist, but I won't embed them, so he won't get that relevancy. And people have the nerve to say they don't do this on purpose. 1. Who is he 2. Where is his review 3. Did it count? 4. That's what he gets for being pathetic Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 19 minutes ago, Quasi said: But the mere idea of expecting backlash means that he knew what he was doing was going to rattle some feathers. Of course not every journalist has to praise the album to the heavens but him saying "Why aren't I getting some reaction....." signifies to me that he was looking for it and is disappointed that he didn't receive any. that subhuman filth deserved what he got. let's continue ignoring his irrelevant ass Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Surrealist 27,470 Posted October 22, 2016 Author Share Posted October 22, 2016 9 minutes ago, A Gaga Lad said: 1. Who is he 2. Where is his review 3. Did it count? 4. That's what he gets for being pathetic 1. A critic for MIC. 2. I won't link to it, but it's on their site. 3. I don't know. 4. Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Just now, Sycamore said: 1. A critic for MIC. 2. I won't link to it, but it's on their site. 3. I don't know. 4. Yes. yeah id rather it remains that he is out of the radar Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lextyr97 19,953 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Honestly, is a good thing people aren't reacting. It shows that people don't give a **** about reviews with no effort put forth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2007 5,291 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I just hope you guys wouldn't pay attention to them, for real. Don't even bother posting them, let them fade away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerfectGypsy 929 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Who Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.