DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 What do you think is taking so long? They've been publishing an article about her at least once a week since PI release and they had 2 articles since JOANNE dropped. Rolling Stone already released their (good) review. What do you think is going on? Did they all cry and give it a hundred but are worried it'll look like payola so they have to lower the score but can't decide by how much? Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,548 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I think they're freaking out its not Chainsmoker Electrotrash & are too shook to release anything less than a 70. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades 27,980 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 They probably still listen to lemonade after all that praise. If i see anything below 70 : Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeeshy Keety 9,908 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 They're too busy gathering stocks to buy out Metacritic and delete negative reviews They / Them 🏳️🌈 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTPOPSYCHOLOGY 6,270 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Rolling stone had a good review that only gave it 1/2 a star more than ARTPOP. Being a clinical psychology student ive been dealing with quantitative statistical analysis for years and these reviews have no basis. Idk why the credible sources (AllMusic, Rolling Stone, Guardian, etc) don't adhere to a point system for rating Music such as the one I use for blogs Lyrical Qualtity (out of 1) Production Quality (out of 1) Vocal Quality (out of 1) Cohesiveness (out of 1) Themes (out of 1) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 22, 2016 Author Share Posted October 22, 2016 2 minutes ago, ARTPOPSYCHOLOGY said: Rolling stone had a good review that only gave it 1/2 a star more than ARTPOP. Being a clinical psychology student ive been dealing with quantitative statistical analysis for years and these reviews have no basis. Idk why the credible sources (AllMusic, Rolling Stone, Guardian, etc) don't adhere to a point system for rating Music such as the one I use for blogs Lyrical Qualtity (out of 1) Production Quality (out of 1) Vocal Quality (out of 1) Cohesiveness (out of 1) Themes (out of 1) Well the thing is probably because even within one publication, they have different critics that use their own formula? It is confusing I must admit. Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.