Bloody 64,631 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 that's a decent score, not bad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 I feel like Billboard and RS were waiting for each other, so RS giving Joanne a good score is a good indicator that Billboard will, too Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlayGagaloo 16,152 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 3 minutes ago, living4theFAmE said: Go learn Math are you trying to be funny newbie ? Over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
living4theFAmE 22 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 1 minute ago, Tommi said: More like living4theSHamE, get yourself together and don't be so rude Okay... you are right, that was a low blow! sorry Everybody's got to love each other Stop throwin' stones at your sisters and your brothers!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swordstalker 1,829 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 5 minutes ago, LsSiel said: I don't understand "normalized". As I see 3.5 it's a 75, isn't? So in metacritic is counted as 70? In both, the sum and the display rating from Rolling Stone? Also, I didn't understand why when Joanne had only 4 reviews (60+40+80+60) had a rating of 58, when the average was 60... Sorry if I don't understand, or I didn't explain myself pretty well, I'm still learning english ^^° Greetings! Your English is flawless (and still has a Diamond Heart). What I believe is happening is that Rolling Stone scored are converted very simply to scores out of 100 (for example, 3.5/5 becomes 70/100). Then, Metacritic looks at the score of 70/100 and compares it to the Rolling Stone average on Metacritic (which is, for example, 60/100). This score is then normalized to some Metacritic scale based on some algorithm that uses that score comparison, and things like publication credibility. More information: http://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 1 minute ago, Shawn Lee said: They give 25 a 100 I love Adele but 21 and 19 deserve more than 70 See everyone is biased back when 21 was out they give it a 60 because Adele wasn't this big 21 has 76 on metacritic.It's what it deserves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderLevi2 5,849 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 4 minutes ago, KaanBTW said: Her best album in 5 years and 3,5 star? What is the truth? It's not bad at all... Only 1.5 away from a perfect score. Currently listening to Joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
living4theFAmE 22 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 1 minute ago, SlayGagaloo said: are you trying to be funny newbie ? Gurl I take it back!! my baaaad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LsSiel 26 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 1 minute ago, swordstalker said: Your English is flawless (and still has a Diamond Heart). What I believe is happening is that Rolling Stone scored are converted very simply to scores out of 100 (for example, 3.5/5 becomes 70/100). Then, Metacritic looks at the score of 70/100 and compares it to the Rolling Stone average on Metacritic (which is, for example, 60/100). This score is then normalized to some Metacritic scale based on some algorithm that uses that score comparison, and things like publication credibility. Oh! Ok! I din't thought it was that elaborated. Thank's a lot for the explanation and the complement! I gess I'll be practicing my english here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagzDonkeyD 1,293 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 Just now, Britney Spears said: 21 has 76 on metacritic.It's what it deserves RS used to give 21 a 3/5 then after the Grammy it magically became a 3.5/5 Just saying the truth And 25 deserves a 100? 21 is more deserved Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
connorfilm 7,295 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 5 minutes ago, A Gaga Lad said: I feel like Billboard and RS were waiting for each other, so RS giving Joanne a good score is a good indicator that Billboard will, too I'll be shocked if Billboard doesn't give it a good review. They were one of the few publications to give AP a score higher than 7/10 in 2013. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 Just now, ConnorFilm said: I'll be shocked if Billboard doesn't give it a good review. They were one of the few publications to give AP a score higher than 7/10 in 2013. Frankly, I have a good feeling BB will give around 85 Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 Just now, Shawn Lee said: RS used to give 21 a 3/5 then after the Grammy it magically became a 3.5/5 Just saying the truth And 25 deserves a 100? 21 is more deserved Well 25 is a more coherent and mature album. 21 for me has HUGE HITS and a few meh songs. 25 only has good songs but it obviously ain't worthy of 100 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djBuffoon 12,115 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 Still low-balling her, but at least it's not a 40/100 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leaf 2,429 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 I will be happy with a 4/5 from NME, and a positive one if Pitchfork reviews. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.