Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Bill Clinton Rape/Hillary Intimidation Victim Speaks Out


Gaga Monster

Featured Posts

Gaga Monster
Just now, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

You can joke about it if the person is a liar 

She is not a liar according to Hillary who stated all victims will be believed.

 

GGD Presidential Elections
Link to post
Share on other sites

PunkTheFunk
12 minutes ago, London GUY said:

Fake and Selenasexual,

funny this comes out as soon as trump gets exposed

She first came forward with this in 1999 :madge: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

President Trump
Just now, Gaga Monster said:

She is not a liar according to Hillary who stated all victims will be believed.

 

 

Just now, Gaga Monster said:

She is not a liar according to Hillary who stated all victims will be believed.

 

Then go vote for trump then, you racist Mexican and woman hater!!! (Not saying you are, just all trump supporters as their king is a racist)

Ma ma pa pa pa
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaga Monster
Just now, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

Who cares what Hitlery said. This lady is a jokeT

You have no idea who she is and never met her and probably didn't bother watching the emotional interview. To say this women is a joke when she is bawling her eyes out about what Bill did is wrong. Bill has a long line of sexual accusations against him

GGD Presidential Elections
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince

Her main issue is with Bill. This was a headline in the 90's. 

She says Hillary threatened her, but where is the proof? That's the only way this will be relevant. 

She has made herself a political tool, don't be surprised when people don't see it as genuine without concrete evidence. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

En_Sabah_Nur

She originally brought these accusations forward in 1997/1999, but the actual "event" took place back in 1978...  So what took her so long to come forward?  And coincidentally she comes forward with these accusations right around the time of the Monica Lewinsky Scandal...  Hmmmmmmmm, I smell a RAT!  🤔🤔🤔  :neyde::neyde::neyde:  :madge::madge::madge:

 

 

Egypt. W
Link to post
Share on other sites

whore

I hate how people use Bill's actions against Hillary. Just because they are married doesn't mean that they will do the exact same thing while in office. They are two totally different people. Lets look at Hillary as a single person and not hold her responsible for the Clinton name. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

manicholic

no Breitfart on this site thank u

There's nothing harder for people to do than admit they were fooled.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
43 minutes ago, Himeros26 said:

Yet she let a rapist walk away free.

Ugh, I'm only going to vote for her because I feel as if I must.

Because that is how our judicial system is set up. Citizens have a right to be defended in a court of law and those who can't afford legal counsel are appointed a public defender. Public defenders advocate for innocent and guilty people, just like lawyers who are hired by wealthy people. It is up to the judge and/or jury to determine if a person is guilty or innocent, not the public defender assigned to the job. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
44 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Her main issue is with Bill. This was a headline in the 90's. 

She says Hillary threatened her, but where is the proof? That's the only way this will be relevant. 

She has made herself a political tool, don't be surprised when people don't see it as genuine without concrete evidence. 

“Did Bill Clinton or anyone near him ever threaten you, try to intimidate you, do anything to keep you silent?” Dateline’s Lisa Myers asked her in 1999. “No,” Broaddrick replied. But a few months later, Broaddrick gave an interview to the Drudge Report in which she said that Hillary had indeed tried to shut her up, albeit very subtly. At the Clinton fundraiser Broaddrick attended, she told Drudge, Hillary “caught me and took my hand and said 'I am so happy to meet you. I want you to know that we appreciate everything you do for Bill.’ ” Broaddrick interpreted this as a threat, but it sounds like the kind of thing a candidate’s wife at a political event would say to all his supporters. Even in her rendering of Hillary’s words, there is nothing outwardly sinister in them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Himeros26
12 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Because that is how our judicial system is set up. Citizens have a right to be defended in a court of law and those who can't afford legal counsel are appointed a public defender. Public defenders advocate for innocent and guilty people, just like lawyers who are hired by wealthy people. It is up to the judge and/or jury to determine if a person is guilty or innocent, not the public defender assigned to the job. 

Corrupt

Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
58 minutes ago, London GUY said:

 

And I agree with this, but in many cases, especially regarding large celebrities, and if these claims were true, there would likely of been a large scandal,

 

Once again I apologise for the lack of sensitivity shown in my original post

As a rape survivor myself, if it helps ease any guilt, know that I'm personally not offended at all by your statements :happy: it's hard to dance around this topic when you're speaking of big name figures like this. It's best to just plainly say what you mean instead of trying to water it down or dance around the point in fear of upsetting anyone imo.

OT:  Hillary was a defense attorney who was good enough at her job that some alleged rapists walked free. If anyone is to blame there, it's the system. At least, that's Trump's logic when you ask him why he hasn't paid taxes in nearly 20 years.

Bill was an adulterer and is accused of being a rapist. Trump himself was accused of rape by his first wife, sexual assault by a woman in '97(?), holding a 13 year old girl as a sex slave with another notorious pedo-billionaire, talked about his daughter's "rack" while she was an infant and in an interview, and this tape from 2005 is even more damning along with his long, long history of objectifying, demeaning, and (allegedly) assaulting women.

At this point, Trump's doing his damnedest to muddy her already dirty name but all he's doing is shattering that big glass house he lives in.

I'll not be swayed by weightless accusations and rumors when the solid, tangible proof sells itself easily enough. Hillary is, in every way, better than Trump. The rest is just icing on the cake, whether it's spoiled or not. I cannot wait until November for this whole ridiculous mess to be over and so we'll never have to hear Trump's name again.

Whimsical bitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
21 minutes ago, Whispering said:

“Did Bill Clinton or anyone near him ever threaten you, try to intimidate you, do anything to keep you silent?” Dateline’s Lisa Myers asked her in 1999. “No,” Broaddrick replied. But a few months later, Broaddrick gave an interview to the Drudge Report in which she said that Hillary had indeed tried to shut her up, albeit very subtly. At the Clinton fundraiser Broaddrick attended, she told Drudge, Hillary “caught me and took my hand and said 'I am so happy to meet you. I want you to know that we appreciate everything you do for Bill.’ ” Broaddrick interpreted this as a threat, but it sounds like the kind of thing a candidate’s wife at a political event would say to all his supporters. Even in her rendering of Hillary’s words, there is nothing outwardly sinister in them.

 

:rip:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
12 minutes ago, Himeros26 said:

Corrupt

Just the opposite. 

By providing a way for even the most heinous accused to have their viewpoints heard through an educated lawyer, we reduce the chances of wrongly punishing an innocent person in the future. 

Everyone is entitled to a defense, and to a lawyer, because our rule of law is based upon the premise that the State must prove its case against a person beyond a reasonable doubt and because history teaches us that the State is quite often wrong when it accuses someone of crime. The principle of that—like the presumption of innocence or the right to confront a witness against you—is more important than is the result of any single case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...