WIKILEAKS: October Surprise @ 3AM EST

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

I don't think I will stay up to watch it live, but excited to see in the morning what it was about!

[Bebe 17,289]

4 hours ago, Edonis said:

Jill is anti-vax. Your argument is moot just on that basis. 

Anyways, the people supporting Assange are trash. He's the guy who outed a bunch of gay men in Saudi Arabia which could have serious outcomes down the line. Sharing important info to the public is one thing, but going this far in a threatening manner is another. 

http://www.snopes.com/is-green-party-candidate-jill-stein-anti-vaccine/

I'm not saying to anyone that they should vote Jill Stein. This race is a two person race, whether people like it or not. I think it's important to keep Trump out of the white house.

It's just that, it would be less frustrating if people so thoroughly against Jill Stein actually did some research into her proposals and positions instead of just blindly accepting the smear that she thinks vaccines cause autism. There is only one person who holds that position in this race and that's:

 

[Goosey 3,017]

30 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

If he(Julian Assange) gets the orange Hitler elected by releasing something catastrophic about her between now & the election next month.  Then I will be all for droning his ASS!   

Wikileaks: "Video reveals Hillary boils live kittens for dinner on Tuesdays!"

Anti-Trump faction: "Who cares? Shut up! You got Orange Hitler elected!"

 

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

Just now, Goosey said:

Wikileaks: "Video reveals Hillary boils live kittens for dinner on Tuesdays!"

Anti-Trump faction: "Who cares? Shut up! You got Orange Hitler elected!"

 

Sounds accurate.  

Too bad for the little kittens then!!!  

 

[Goosey 3,017]

32 minutes ago, PartySick said:

joking about Hillary's death twice and Obama's once

Uh, no. It wasn't a joke. In fact, it's something I've heard countless times about many, many politicians before Trump ever said it. He said "let's see what happens to her". It's not a joke. She's against "assault weapons on our streets" but she surrounds herself with them. There's something wrong there. Trump is pointing out her hypocrisy. He's not suggesting anything and it was not inappropriate IMO. All these politicians surround themselves with guns and then fight for gun control. Bloomberg even made Bermuda change its laws so he could take his armed bodyguards there! He refused to act like a regular person and go unarmed. And Bloomberg is one of the biggest anti-gun crusaders

The second time he said “By the way, and if she gets the pick—if she gets the pick of her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I dunno.” Which does not imply assassination! The Second Amendment is there for the people to overthrow the government. Trump was implying civilians would become fed up and stage a revolution.

 

 

And by the way, Hillary implied an Obama assassination herself!

 

"[Obama] had all but locked down his historic nomination, but former first lady was holding on until June, refusing to concede.

When pressed further, Clinton then raised the memory of Robert F Kennedy’s assassination, and the possibility of Obama getting murdered, as the reason why she was hanging on in there.

“My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.” Clinton said."

https://www.rt.com/usa/355391-clinton-assassination-obama-2008/

[Matangi 3,050]

21 minutes ago, Bebe said:

http://www.snopes.com/is-green-party-candidate-jill-stein-anti-vaccine/

I'm not saying to anyone that they should vote Jill Stein. This race is a two person race, whether people like it or not. I think it's important to keep Trump out of the white house.

It's just that, it would be less frustrating if people so thoroughly against Jill Stein actually did some research into her proposals and positions instead of just blindly accepting the smear that she thinks vaccines cause autism. There is only one person who holds that position in this race and that's:

 

thank yoouuuu

[Whispering 18,865]

1 hour ago, FATCAT said:

Never, I'll just move on to 2020!

Go on and do it then!  

[FATCAT 60,888]

Just now, Whispering said:

Go on and do it then!  

Oh, it's not November yet, mi amour!

[Whispering 18,865]

3 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Oh, it's not November yet, mi amour!

When it hits November, then you will stop until 2020? 

[FATCAT 60,888]

1 minute ago, Whispering said:

When it hits November, then you will stop until 2020? 

When the election is over, I'll criticize Hillary for letting that baboon beat her.

[Whispering 18,865]

1 minute ago, FATCAT said:

When the election is over, I'll criticize Hillary for letting that baboon beat her.

So, your 2020 date means nothing, no matter which way it goes, right? 

[FATCAT 60,888]

Just now, Whispering said:

So, your 2020 date means nothing, no matter which way it goes, right? 

What the hell are you on about? You lowkey need to help Trump with this 5D tic tac toe.

[ItsTommyBitch 12,640]

I mean, didn't Assange pretty much admit that he doesnt like Hillary when he livestreamed with Bill Maher a couple of months ago? I don't think its fair to say that Wikileaks is some sort of totally non-partisan, completely uninterested in the results of their actions, bystander. They know exactly what they are doing and operating on moral black and whites is immature, the nuances of the situation we face can't and shouldn't be simplified. All that being said, I personally can understand how this is a bad thing to say (though I think its fair to assume it was a "flippant" remark and not serious). I'm still #WithHer though with literally not a single second thought  

Knowing what is objectively "the truth" is NOT what's "best" or most "moral" for people all of the time. Yes, it can and should be argued case by case. Putting this out in a not-so-subtle effort to hurt Clinton is actively taking a step towards hurting her chances of winning the presidency which will have a direct effect on millions of innocent people most likely. I think this is easily a situation where us knowing every little secret of hers is not necessary in order to make an informed vote... especially when we don't know "that" many of Donald's. He's as much under lock and cage as Hillary is when it comes to his past. His past phrases and sayings are being commonly referenced, but he's done so much more that mainstream news doesn't care to bring up. Also, we have an uninformed base voting for him, so I mean  

Anyway, I think the greater good out weighs any sort of faux-truth liberation agenda in this instance  

[Whispering 18,865]

43 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

What the hell are you on about? You lowkey need to help Trump with this 5D tic tac toe.

What are you on about for months now? You realize that Bernie has moved on and you haven't. 

 

[FATCAT 60,888]

34 minutes ago, Whispering said:

What are you on about for months now? You realize that Bernie has moved on and you haven't. 

 

Hillary will be a shitty candidate no matter what. There is no "moving on" from the facts.

I've done a lot of support against Trump's stupidity, basically in favor of Hillary, yet you still wanna pick fights. You're disgracing the name of your people, you're disgracing the name of the Hillarybots. Where's the passion?