Whispering 18,865 Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 Lol, the FBI has already investigated this. Reddit users thinking they know more than the FBI. Just look how they identified the Boston Marathon Bomber.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 hour ago, FATCAT said: They'd rather have a Trump presidency than give up their cookie jar. Our only hope is that Biden steps in, otherwise, Hello President Trump. Oh please. They are going with the nominee who won the most delegates, states and popular vote...Hillary Clinton. Biden can't just "step in". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,977 Posted September 19, 2016 Author Share Posted September 19, 2016 Just now, Whispering said: Biden can't just "step in". Well then Hello President Trump. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 Just now, FATCAT said: Well then Hello President Trump. If that's who wins the most electoral votes, then that will be the case. That's how it works. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,977 Posted September 19, 2016 Author Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 minute ago, Whispering said: If that's who wins the most electoral votes, then that will be the case. That's how it works. If Clinton were to step down, they can nominate anyone. Biden would most likely be their next pick. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uo111 5,285 Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 Reddit? Do people actually believe this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,977 Posted September 19, 2016 Author Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 minute ago, uo111 said: Reddit? Do people actually believe this? Are you discrediting the US News and World Report? Reddit is a just a forum. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uo111 5,285 Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 8 minutes ago, FATCAT said: Are you discrediting the US News and World Report? Reddit is a just a forum. "An army of reddit users believe" is the first line. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,977 Posted September 19, 2016 Author Share Posted September 19, 2016 Just now, uo111 said: "An army of reddit users believe" is the first line. - Works for Hillary administration. - Tasked with "stripping out" email addresses. - Asks /r/exchangeserver for help. - Account is linked to his own name. - He is without doubt the worst computer tech I've ever heard of. Who was supposed to connect the dots but the users of that same forum? You're just trying to discredit some lengthy evidence. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uo111 5,285 Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 40 minutes ago, FATCAT said: - Works for Hillary administration. - Tasked with "stripping out" email addresses. - Asks /r/exchangeserver for help. - Account is linked to his own name. - He is without doubt the worst computer tech I've ever heard of. Who was supposed to connect the dots but the users of that same forum? You're just trying to discredit some lengthy evidence. The account is not linked to this own name. I read the article in it's entirety. We already knew the emails were deleted, we already knew that this guy is the guy who deleted it. From what I can gather, the only thing new we've learned is that this guy is even more stupid than originally thought. Surely you don't think this is the proof we've been waiting for that Hillary's email servers were deleted? That has been proven for a while. I really don't know what exactly you think it proves that we didn't already know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,977 Posted September 19, 2016 Author Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 minute ago, uo111 said: The account is not linked to this own name. I read the article in it's entirety. We already knew the emails were deleted, we already knew that this guy is the guy who deleted it. From what I can gather, the only thing new we've learned is that this guy is even more stupid than originally thought. Surely you don't think this is the proof we've been waiting for that Hillary's email servers were deleted? That has been proven for a while. I really don't know what exactly you think it proves that we didn't already know. That it was premeditated. Also, The Hill just picked up the story. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uo111 5,285 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 28 minutes ago, FATCAT said: That it was premeditated. Also, The Hill just picked up the story. It doesn't prove that it was premeditated though. If anything it backs up the story that this guy is such an idiot that he didn't implement the 60-day policy that he was asked to implement and deleted the emails in March to try to cover the fact that he doesn't actually know how to do his really simple job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,977 Posted September 20, 2016 Author Share Posted September 20, 2016 Just now, uo111 said: It doesn't prove that it was premeditated though. If anything it backs up the story that this guy is such an idiot that he didn't implement the 60-day policy that he was asked to implement and deleted the emails in March to try to cover the fact that he doesn't actually know how to do his really simple job. He was going to cover it up by doing something he didn't know how to do? He was directed to do it from higher ups. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uo111 5,285 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Just now, FATCAT said: He was going to cover it up by doing something he didn't know how to do? He was directed to do it from higher ups. The article says we already knew they asked him to implement the 60-day policy. That is not new information. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,977 Posted September 20, 2016 Author Share Posted September 20, 2016 1 minute ago, uo111 said: The article says we already knew they asked him to implement the 60-day policy. That is not new information. This is not a 60 day policy. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.