SKANK 14,288 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, xdxrovied said: why do y'all always talk about how good is a song by how it would have done in the charts????????? I meant creativity successful more so than commercially successful, but both are relevant if you are talking about the sucess of a song by an artist who creates music with the purpose of it being as popular as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
notamember 667 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 It's just a remix guys. We can buy and stream it even if we don't like it for the charts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xdxrovied 323 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Just now, SKANK said: I meant creativity successful more so than commercially successful, but both are relevant if you are talking about the sucess of a song by an artist who creates music with the purpose of it being as popular as possible. .....do you really think Gaga does music for that purpose? and if you do, are you a fan of someone with that mindset? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKANK 14,288 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Just now, xdxrovied said: .....do you really think Gaga does music for that purpose? and if you do, are you a fan of someone with that mindset? I don't think there is any shame in an artist wanting their work to be popular and reach as many people as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxxx 50 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 keep it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amatoxina 688 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Let's burry everything that had to do with ARTPOP, thank you so much Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xdxrovied 323 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 1 minute ago, SKANK said: I don't think there is any shame in an artist wanting their work to be popular and reach as many people as possible. you didn't say it like that you said her PURPOSE was to sell... very different Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juanjo 2,139 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Yeah, no. Thank you, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lextyr97 19,886 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 50 minutes ago, memomemome said: Twistanfienxojemzodnainaxlwdvsjxosanjzlanzbaobzmzoabaux LADY GAGA! LMAOOOOOOOOO ACCURATE X2131 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisdomless1 281 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 This is going to be such a mind blow, IT'S HAPPENING!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKANK 14,288 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 Just now, xdxrovied said: you didn't say it like that you said her PURPOSE was to sell... very different I don't think it is different. She makes pop music, pop being short for popular. Commercial sucess isn't just a byproduct of her music it is part of its intention. She wants to reach as many people as possible. I don't think there is anything wrong with that, and I don't think an artist being driven my commercial sucess necessarily means their art is worth any less than art created by an artist who creates with disregard for the public. She goes into more detail about it in an interview she did with Neil Strauss for his book. I don't have it on me, but it's worth reading if you can find it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo Rose 1,475 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 LOL just like Wale is still waiting on that 2nd collab Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lextyr97 19,886 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 9 minutes ago, Wisdomless1 said: This is going to be such a mind blow, IT'S HAPPENING!!! Jesus, I'll blow the mind of both of you guys lmao Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xdxrovied 323 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 5 minutes ago, SKANK said: I don't think it is different. She makes pop music, pop being short for popular. Commercial sucess isn't just a byproduct of her music it is part of its intention. She wants to reach as many people as possible. I don't think there is anything wrong with that, and I don't think an artist being driven my commercial sucess necessarily means their art is worth any less than art created by an artist who creates with disregard for the public. She goes into more detail about it in an interview she did with Neil Strauss for his book. I don't have it on me, but it's worth reading if you can find it. lemme read it and i'll keep talking... but... it's obvious an artist wants to sell their art, nothing wrong with it. the problem for me comes when this "art" is just made as a way to get money. like, money first and then creativity, that's the problem anyways, you did measure how good the song was with how much success it would've had Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenelopesTaint 439 Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 pass Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.