Americano 31,061 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Why are all of Gaga's standard albums 7.99 except ARTPOP is 11.99 I think? ARTPOP should be 3.99 and the rest 7.99 tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,775 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Fun fact: Rise has gotten more dark red updates than PI in the past 24 hours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Gangsta 6,693 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, Luc said: Fun fact: Rise has gotten more dark red updates than PI in the past 24 hours. yas 150k here we come Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViviLittleM 3 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Just like Gaga & Bobby before PI. Katy is coming http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1057155 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Americano 31,061 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 nawt a top 20 debut not even top 10 just 3 weeks ago i was hoping for top 5 what kind of DECAY someone call 911 it's a hot 100 emergency Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,775 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, Torturo said: I actually think all songs should be 0.69, that would revive a sales for few more years Don't think so. Sales don't need to be revived, because streaming is a lucrative industry. Sweden was the first to pick up streaming, and it let to BIG growth of their music industry. "The Swedish music industry has a seen an encouraging revival in just three years, from a low of US$144.8 million in 2008, revenues grew to US$194.2 million in 2013." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Americano 31,061 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Remember when BTW sold like 500,000 copies in 3 days PI selling less than 97,000 in 7 JESUS HOLD THE WHEEL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Gangsta 6,693 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 1 minute ago, Luc said: Don't think so. Sales don't need to be revived, because streaming is a lucrative industry. Sweden was the first to pick up streaming, and it let to BIG growth of their music industry. "The Swedish music industry has a seen an encouraging revival in just three years, from a low of US$144.8 million in 2008, revenues grew to US$194.2 million in 2013." But I don't want sales to die Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Gangsta 6,693 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Us tonight waiting for AHS while hoping PI is featured Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Americano 31,061 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain America 16 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 The top 20 debut was a given with these numbers but it hurts more when you see it posted officially by sources like billboard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Americano 31,061 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 I mean it's less of the fact it's top 20 and more of the fact she's probably not even going to sell 100k copies in a FULL WEEK of sales. Industry decline or not, that's just bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stef 61,598 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 20 minutes ago, Americano said: I mean it's less of the fact it's top 20 and more of the fact she's probably not even going to sell 100k copies in a FULL WEEK of sales. Industry decline or not, that's just bad. Exactly. Like. It is tragic and, like I said a few days ago, there ain't no way of dressing this up, its just a plain tragic debut. (Even though a debut can and probably will be built on and in a few weeks she may very well outsell her debut week, who knows. But its Britney 2016 numbers, and that IS tragic) Signature loading… 👹🖤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaMyBlood95 9,915 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, Stef said: Exactly. Like. It is tragic and, like I said a few days ago, there ain't no way of dressing this up, its just a plain tragic debut But Katy debuted with like 130k? I mean, it is more but it's 30k more, not 300k more.. And would you ever say in 2013 that Katy would release a song and it would debut with those numbers? No, and it doesn't matter that it wasn't a lead single, it was a full on single! Even so, Katy comes from her highly successful era, unlike Gaga. Yes, I have expected first week numbers to be a little bit higher than 100k but seriously, I am not even that surprised we got this.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stef 61,598 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 2 minutes ago, GagaMyBlood95 said: But Katy debuted with like 130k? I mean, it is more but it's 30k more, not 300k more.. And would you ever say in 2013 that Katy would release a song and it would debut with those numbers? No, and it doesn't matter that it wasn't a lead single, it was a full on single! Even so, Katy comes from her highly successful era, unlike Gaga. Yes, I have expected first week numbers to be a little bit higher than 100k but seriously, I am not even that surprised we got this.. But in 2016 100k is deemed tbe line between acceptable and underperforming, I guess. And if Britney is doing 96k, and Gaga is doing 97k (pending a reduction in prediction)... An artist of Gaga's caliber should be mastering 130k no problem. Signature loading… 👹🖤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.