Katsuki Bakugo 9,788 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Just now, MaryJaneHolland said: Gaga was just luckier to become successful before Natalia and start the "darker" themes. That doesn't make Natalia a copycat, right? Natalia has never been herself anyways. Verbalicious and whoever she is now, she is clearly a jumper on the band wagon, deny it all you want but owning up to it and realising it doesn't make the music and visual any less good just means you know her references. If All You Ever Do Is Look Down On People, You Won't Be Able To Recognize Your Own Weaknesses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 1 hour ago, AyaKara said: I didn't even watch it because of the thumbnail alone Nothing about their music, their lyrics, their vocals -- even their harmony styles -- are similar. People need to stop. They both like high fashion. So what? The only similarity between them is the fact that they both worked with Fernando Garribay. Nothing more. A lot of Gaga fans can be very delusional or overprotective, but that's a symptom of stan culture in general. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVID VOGUER 1,956 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 1 minute ago, Melisandre said: Natalia has never been herself anyways. Verbalicious and whoever she is now, she is clearly a jumper on the band wagon, deny it all you want but owning up to it and realising it doesn't make the music and visual any less good just means you know her references. THIS! It's not copying, it's references, it's the bandwagon that Gaga started/brought back Who knows how Natalia Kills could end up looking if it wasn't for Gaga at that time... I'm not saying she's stealing from Gaga, she was just heavily influenced at that timee - her fashion, music, music videos, genre, manager or whatever Also it's important how you put together those references, Gaga won at doing those things. She knows POP culture from it's core. They can't scare me, if I scare them first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsuki Bakugo 9,788 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 1 minute ago, TheLucifer said: THIS! It's not copying, it's references, it's the bandwagon that Gaga started/brought back Who knows how Natalia Kills could end up looking if it wasn't for Gaga at that time... I'm not saying she's stealing from Gaga, she was just heavily influenced at that timee - her fashion, music, music videos, genre, manager or whatever Also it's important how you put together those references, Gaga won at doing those things. She knows POP culture from it's core. E - X-ACTLY! If All You Ever Do Is Look Down On People, You Won't Be Able To Recognize Your Own Weaknesses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVID VOGUER 1,956 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Also, to prove that I'm not trying to bash you or Natalia I must say, video you've posted is as ridiculous as this one They can't scare me, if I scare them first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaryJaneHolland 77,348 Posted August 19, 2016 Author Share Posted August 19, 2016 6 minutes ago, TheLucifer said: Who knows how Natalia Kills could end up looking if it wasn't for Gaga at that time... I'm not saying she's stealing from Gaga, she was just heavily influenced at that timee - her fashion, music, music videos, genre, manager or whatever She wasn't inspired. That's who she is. And it happened to be similar with what Gaga was doing. And also, at the same time with Gaga. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAVID VOGUER 1,956 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 1 minute ago, MaryJaneHolland said: She wasn't inspired. That's who she is. And it happened to be similar with what Gaga was doing. And also, at the same time with Gaga. influenced, not inspired... maybe inspired but we can never know.. They can't scare me, if I scare them first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrer Zorola 3,966 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 excuse me but this video is proof enough it's not that "Gaga invented covering her eye" but it's not coincidental either how Natalia does the same gimmicks LIFE IS GOOD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xoxo Adriana 15,040 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 I agree, and I hate the word "copy", I use the word "Inspiration" because no artist is completely original they all have idols and inspirations they look up to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ApplauseftAdele 4,730 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 5 hours ago, MaryJaneHolland said: Now.. I'm sitting and watching this video and thinking "This is the worst video I've ever watched" It's just 2 minutes, so take time and watch it! This video makes no sense. - Natalia is just covering her eye. Did Gaga invent the eye covering? - Natalia is just throwing money in her video. Did Gaga invent throwing money? - Natalia is just shaking her head in her music video. Did Gaga invent shaking head? - Natalia is just wearing sunglasses. Did Gaga invent sunglasses? - Natalia is just sitting on a car in her music video. Did Gaga invent sitting? - She is just wearing a bob wig. Did Gaga invent the bob wigs? - She has a TV in her video. Did Gaga invent the TV? - She is just taking off her sunglasses in the music video. Did Gaga invent that too? It's stupid how we always get mad when people accuse Gaga for copying Madonna for stupid things like this, but, at the same time, we accuse other artists of copying Gaga for the most random sh*t. Thoughts? Give me e proof that Natalia copied Gaga Okay, you'll send me that ice-cream looking wig, which is a total coincidence. But is there anything else? THERE'S NOT. Keep your post on topic, either way they'll be reported. Well did her husband invent a suit and greased hair? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativenewyorker 1,190 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 It's not that she stole any particular look or style from Gaga, it's just the way she approached her career and when she debuted, It's obvious Interscope and will.i.am were pushing her as the next Gaga. From the sound of "Mirrors", the "artsy dark pop" a la The Fame Monster, the avant garde looks, the pop concept album about vanity and sex, putting out a series called "Love, Kills" just like "The Fame Part 1" film..etc. It's just sad how much they tried to make her the next Gaga and it failed. Even working with Martin Kierszenbaum (Cherry Cherry Boom Boom) and Fernando Garibay couldn't save her album. I'm pretty sure she was even told not to mention Gaga and deny the comparisons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanko 9,860 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 1. her whole style screamed lady gaga tfm 2. no one cares about hr anymore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativenewyorker 1,190 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 And she definitely is a trend hopper. She went from rap in the early 2000s when it was big, to a Lil Mama "Lipgloss" sound after that was a hit, to a Nelly Furtado/Timbaland vibe, to a dark pop avant garde style when Gaga came out, then to an atmospheric melancholy urban sound when Lana came out, and now she's going for a alternative pop sound which may or may not be inspired by the rise of Halsey and other indie altpop girls? Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny 12,736 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 yes gaga invented all of that I don't even know how anyone could even like her after that x factor mess I like dancin', and ponies.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flopheart 1,865 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Yes she did in her early steps. love her music btw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.