Mother and son arrested for having incestuous relationship

[uo111 5,282]

3 hours ago, Dayum said:

Gays carry a higher risk of spreading STDs. Incest carries a higher risk of birth defects. One is legal the other is not. Pffft.... this thread is disgusting and should be made illegal.

No they don't.

Gays have more stds because they like to have unprotected sex. It has nothing to do with being gay.

 

You can stop comparing being gay to incest now thanks bye.

[Chris Evans 8,919]

28 minutes ago, DiscoHeaven23 said:

I saw something on Dateline once, years ago and it was about family members who were apart for years and ended up falling in love. Like it's a real psychological phenomena that happens.

 

 

this topic was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this

I've read about estranged family members who have this weird urge to sleep with each other which I believe is the case here

I'm not going to tell them that it's messed up since they're both consenting but I'm also not going to say I support it in any way

since this is rare between people who were raised together I would assume this is something psychological that they need help with 

 

[ryanripley 86,575]

i am NOT HERE for people trying to sympathise this with LGBT people holy sh*t

this is NOTHING like a homosexual relationship, get the f*ck out, this is disgusting and gross and no, i'll never accept them and don't you dare quote me saying "shame on you, gay ppl are all about love", you can eat my quick cook noodles  

Spoiler

side note:

 

[Pacify Him 9,073]

So... which side won from this argument? 

[ALGAYDO 35,135]

2 minutes ago, VenusAsABoy said:

So... which side won from this argument? 

Neither. This topic is way too complicated to be won in a Gaga fan site filled with way too many naive members lmao 

[uo111 5,282]

3 minutes ago, VenusAsABoy said:

So... which side won from this argument? 

Science won this argument a long time ago.

Inbreeding is dangerous.

[Chris Evans 8,919]

the whole incest relationships = homosexual relationships argument reminded me of someone saying feminism = racism the other day

[REALITY 80,167]

Honestly, I don't care what they do with their lives, as long as they: 

A) Don't have a child—because biologically, it's just not right, like, it's scientifically wrong to have an incestuous relationship that results in a child.

B) Are not hurting anyone or themselves.

I do think though, that people shouldn't judge them for having this relationship. It's their life, let them live how they want to. If it's not affecting anyone of us either than them two, then I don't see the big deal.

That being said, the article did say that she would give up on the right to seeing her kids because of him, which I believe is irresponsible. That's where it crosses the line, that's when it starts affecting other people but themselves.

[Pacify Him 9,073]

I still wish they receive the therapy they deserve

[donutellha 13,819]

This is very confusing.  

[Redstreak 6,653]

9 hours ago, Saint Laurent said:

Okay little liberals let's not take it too far this is disgusting and we all know it 

Ah, the good ol' "I love open minded liberalism so long as it helps me only and doesn't push past my personal boundaries."

[Swan Heart 7,382]

1 hour ago, uo111 said:

Science won this argument a long time ago.

Inbreeding is dangerous.

...just as much as an older women getting pregnant/giving birth or even less.

I don't see people calling that disgusting though.

[Miracle 14,068]

This is as bad as gays being arrested for having gay relationships. Come on, let people what they want for love, unless they don't have kids or have them in vitro so they can genetically modify it / adopt them 

 

[Miracle 14,068]

56 minutes ago, M Monstre said:

Honestly, I don't care what they do with their lives, as long as they: 

A) Don't have a child—because biologically, it's just not right, like, it's scientifically wrong to have an incestuous relationship that results in a child.

B) Are not hurting anyone or themselves.

I do think though, that people shouldn't judge them for having this relationship. It's their life, let them live how they want to. If it's not affecting anyone of us either than them two, then I don't see the big deal.

That being said, the article did say that she would give up on the right to seeing her kids because of him, which I believe is irresponsible. That's where it crosses the line, that's when it starts affecting other people but themselves.

B) is completely unnecesary. Would you say the same about a gay/straight/lesbian couple?

And scientifically wrong isn't the right word...I mean, it may be bad in an evolution ways but science has evolved so genetical problems can be solved when in vitro fecundation takes place

 

[Galagala 4,622]

This is a little too abnormal and unhealthy