How HATING Hillary Clinton Became Cool!

[ryanripley 86,575]

huffpost? bye  

i hate the woman and i don't trust her as far as i can throw her and not because of some "hype train" that huffpost is trying to pretend is real

her and trump both embody traits i believe a president shouldn't have but i guess hillary isn't a racist homophobe... but is she lying about that too?  

[President Trump 3,508]

14 minutes ago, myluis617 said:

Lmao people Been hating Hillary dont try to make it sound like people are just aimlessly throwing hate at her without the proper reason.  

 

  She is not the candidate the PEOPLE wanted she is the candidate that the government chose and they made sure there was no chance for her rivals.  Even after an unpresidented number of people wanted to choose Bernie Sanders. She also just had Bernie Sanders endorse her but then she hires the woman who was plotting against Bernie I know the lady worked with Hillary in 2008 but whay that Lady did was shady and what Hillary did was dirty. Furthermore proving that she is crooked and from the beginning she this whole election was rigged in her favor. 

#BernieIn4Years

#HillaryCelebritySheeps

Basically this.

 

i definitely don't dislike hillary because it's "cool." I just think she lies about simple things in unnecessary ways, and also she is not the candidate we wanted or even deserve. She was basically picked for us. I realize she was the one that got votes but you know what I mean. Her attitude is unnecessary sometimes and she doesn't seem genuine. There's more reasons. But it has nothing to do with her emails or Benghazi. I've always been a democrat and I just don't like ha. 

[TerrenceV2 2,001]

39 minutes ago, Licq said:

She was just being typically racist

What does racism have to do with the sexist and STUPID ass question he asked? Why do people want to make everything about race  it's tiring at this point to bring it on irrelevant topics. What does her husband have to do with it? she IS the one in charge, yes a WOMAN. She rightfully answered the question.

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

36 minutes ago, Yaxley said:

Basically this.

 

i definitely don't dislike hillary because it's "cool." I just think she lies about simple things in unnecessary ways, and also she is not the candidate we wanted or even deserve. She was basically picked for us. I realize she was the one that got votes but you know what I mean. Her attitude is unnecessary sometimes and she doesn't seem genuine. There's more reasons. But it has nothing to do with her emails or Benghazi. I've always been a democrat and I just don't like ha. 

After everything she has been through, I'd have an attitude too!!   

 

[President Trump 3,508]

15 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

After everything she has been through, I'd have an attitude too!!   

 

Yeah but in the way that when she's caught in a lie she really comes across not smooth or cool , she's almost sometimes apologetic in a desperate sort of way and I've just had that genuine feeling from her watching her interviews. 

[RAMROD 117,080]

I am waiting for y'all excuse shall she fails her administration in next 4 years lmao

 

[ALGAYDO 35,132]

Tbh she does deserve a lot of the criticism that she gets because she DOES have a long history of being shady AF. Both of the Clintons are shady AF. But so many of y'all take it WAY too ****ing far and make it so personal when it really shouldn't be 

I just hope y'all eat your damn words if Trump ends up winning the election because y'all wanted to sit this race out or vote for a third party instead of being sensible 

[Goosey 3,017]

This article claims Hillary's poor reputation is the work of others. Those 'nasty Republicans' telling lies. Hillary is a victim! It's not her fault she set up that email server!

Nonsense. Look at the source of this 'information'. It's the guy who runs the pro-Clinton Super PAC. "Correct the Record" is a multi-million dollar propaganda machine... and he's complaining about propaganda? This entire article is propaganda. 

 

"Clinton defenders, though, argue that Hillary Clinton reacted to the relentless attacks the way anyone would. “I think that’s blaming the victim,” said David Brock.

Brock [...] runs the pro-Clinton super PAC Correct the Record.

That Hillary Clinton would decide to jealously guard her privacy [...] should not be a surprise, Brock said. “That’s a normal response to 25 years of character assassination.”

[Goosey 3,017]

Bernie supporters are refusing to vote for her despite what Sanders himself said. Look at the approval of these posts made TODAY... roughly 90% upvotes from thousands of those in the Bernie camp.

 

 

 

[REALITY 80,166]

What annoys me the most is that people don't seem to grasp the concept that their only other choice is Donald Trump.

I support Hillary 100%, but objectively looking at this year's election, and not taking my Hillary stan into this, you have to vote for Hillary, it's just something that has be done. Donald Trump is a misogynistic, racist individual who is the complete opposite of what the United States stands for. 

Voting for a Third Party also wouldn't make sense, yes, you have every right to vote for them, and you should vote on the candidate who you most identify with, but realistically, a vote for a third party is a vote for Trump, considering a third party will 100% not be elected as this year's president. 

Yes, her scandals are valid arguments to make a case against why you would support her, but on the other side, you have someone who has no morals, talking about Mexicans, Muslims, women, etc. the way he does, he is not and never will be fit to become president. You don't have to support her, but voting for her is the right thing to do. 

[Zilla 13,451]

6 minutes ago, M Monstre said:

What annoys me the most is that people don't seem to grasp the concept that their only other choice is Donald Trump.

I support Hillary 100%, but objectively looking at this year's election, and not taking my Hillary stan into this, you have to vote for Hillary, it's just something that has be done. Donald Trump is a misogynistic, racist individual who is the complete opposite of what the United States stands for. 

Voting for a Third Party also wouldn't make sense, yes, you have every right to vote for them, and you should vote on the candidate who you most identify with, but realistically, a vote for a third party is a vote for Trump, considering a third party will 100% not be elected as this year's president. 

Yes, her scandals are valid arguments to make a case against why you would support her, but on the other side, you have someone who has no morals, talking about Mexicans, Muslims, women, etc. the way he does, he is not and never will be fit to become president. You don't have to support her, but voting for her is the right thing to do. 

Echoing this, I mean people can vote for whoever they want but there's only 2 legit options now. Yes we have Jill or Tom is his name? (Sorry no shade at all. The governor or former governor of Arizona) and they have great ideas, but they don't have a chance and I'm not saying that to be mean. I personally would rather vote for someone who has foreign policy experience, has held office before, and isn't being rude and hateful to people but again that's opinion. Like there also has to be tons of skeletons in Trump's closet that aren't being shown yet, too. Alas, politics. 

[Emvee 8,831]

This "lesser of two evils" bullshit wouldn't be an issue if we had rank-choice voting like more civilized countries do. But every time this happens, the third party is always used as a scapegoat to scare people into voting for the lesser of two evils. Third parties have the potential to CHANGE our country for the better, but everyone always sticks to the status quo and then complains about stagnation later. Fools. 

[JbGaga 2,261]

Poor Hillary always a victim 

[REALITY 80,166]

29 minutes ago, Zilla said:

Echoing this, I mean people can vote for whoever they want but there's only 2 legit options now. Yes we have Jill or Tom is his name? (Sorry no shade at all. The governor or former governor of Arizona) and they have great ideas, but they don't have a chance and I'm not saying that to be mean. I personally would rather vote for someone who has foreign policy experience, has held office before, and isn't being rude and hateful to people but again that's opinion. Like there also has to be tons of skeletons in Trump's closet that aren't being shown yet, too. Alas, politics. 

This too. Yes, Hillary's scandals may make her seem untrustworthy, but realistically, every government and politician is and can be corrupt to a certain extent.

Plus, you cannot compare her email scandals to Donald Trump's lack of morals. This is a man who has disrespected Mexicans, Muslims, and women for who they are. People who want to compare that to Hillary's emails are just not thinking straight. You're comparing someone's email server to somebody else's lack of compassion and empathy.

 

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

47 minutes ago, Goosey said:

This article claims Hillary's poor reputation is the work of others. Those 'nasty Republicans' telling lies. Hillary is a victim! It's not her fault she set up that email server!

Nonsense. Look at the source of this 'information'. It's the guy who runs the pro-Clinton Super PAC. "Correct the Record" is a multi-million dollar propaganda machine... and he's complaining about propaganda? This entire article is propaganda. 

 

"Clinton defenders, though, argue that Hillary Clinton reacted to the relentless attacks the way anyone would. “I think that’s blaming the victim,” said David Brock.

Brock [...] runs the pro-Clinton super PAC Correct the Record.

That Hillary Clinton would decide to jealously guard her privacy [...] should not be a surprise, Brock said. “That’s a normal response to 25 years of character assassination.”

But he use to be an arch enemy of her's, so don't act like he has always been some bleeding heart liberal with his head so far up her a*s!!!  SMH