State Department Reopens Clinton Investigation

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

5 minutes ago, Halsey said:

Never asked you to vote Killary. #VoteJillStein

Thanks for the suggestion Will look into her!

[President Biden 5,898]

1 minute ago, Gaga Monster said:

Thanks for the suggestion Will look into her!

Or Vermin Supreme

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

8 minutes ago, Halsey said:

Never asked you to vote Killary. #VoteJillStein

Really? You're still floating the Killary line even after a dozen or so investigation into Benghazi exonerated her, including the GOP-spearheaded one by Tres Gaudy?

I'm not shocked at your lack of political knowledge given that you are supporting someone who has never held public office and has as much credentials for running the presidency as a shawarma stand keeper.

[President Biden 5,898]

Just now, LebaneseDude said:

Really? You're still floating the Killary line even after a dozen or so investigation into Benghazi exonerated her?

I'm not shocked at your lack of political knowledge given that you are supporting someone who has never held public office and has as much credentials for running the presidency as a shawarma stand keeper.

Atleast she has does agree with killing others children and erasing evidence. That's better than lies imo

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

4 minutes ago, Halsey said:

Atleast she has does agree with killing others children and erasing evidence. That's better than lies imo

So let me get this straight.

You claim that Jill Stein is better because she has STATED that she holds those viewpoints, while comparing those statements to what Hillary presumably DID.

How is that remotely fair? Jill Stein has never had an opportunity to lie while holding office (and statistics show that all politicians lie to some extent approximately 25% of the time and that's consistent with Bernie and Hillary) and she has also never had the opportunity to do anything to prove that she does indeed believe in what she says.

It's easy to make a plan and say you believe in things when you never actually lead and had a chance to lead them to fruition. 

I'm sure she's intelligent, but she's untried, untested, unbroken, inexperienced, and frankly incompetent based on her responses in the reddit AMA she held a few months back which I attended.

Any manager will tell you that speaking in hypotheticals is ultimately bullshit.

[President Biden 5,898]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

So let me get this straight.

You claim that Jill Stein is better because she has STATED that she holds those viewpoints, while comparing those statements to what Hillary presumably DID.

How is that remotely fair? Jill Stein has never had an opportunity to lie (and statistics show that all politicians lie to some extent approximately 25% of the time and that's consistent with Bernie and Hillary) and she has also never had the opportunity to do anything to prove that she does indeed believe in what she says.

It's easy to make a plan and say you believe in things when you never actually lead.

Any manager will tell you that speaking in hypotheticals is ultimately bullshit.

"Trust is like a mirror, you can build a house or sink a dead body"

 

Simply, I don't trust Hillary 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

9 minutes ago, Halsey said:

"Trust is like a mirror, you can build a house or sink a dead body"

 

Simply, I don't trust Hillary 

While I find your response adorable, you're mixing quotes.

“Trust is like a mirror, you can fix it if it's broken, but you can still see the crack in that mother ****er's reflection.”

“Love is like a brick. You can build a house, or you can sink a dead body.”

Neither one is applicable to Hillary because with the first quote you never actually trusted her to begin with because you never wanted to so you can't really repair something when you don't know how it is supposed to look differently. Maybe you can actually look at how Hillary is as a whole before looking at the broken parts only?

Regarding the second one, your vote I assume is meaningful to you and therefore represents your "love" to your country. You have two meaningful choices in November: Hillary or Trump. You decide which vote is for building a house and which one is for sinking a dead body. 

By all means though vote for Jill Stein. I only wish you do it for the right reasons. I hope my Gagafied response helped 

 

[brendablethyn 536]

Hillary just can't be trusted. It's sad but true. 

[MJHolland 12,725]

1 hour ago, LebaneseDude said:

Don't ****ing lie. It was about Robert Byrd. You gave her **** for it.

Either way my point stands. You consistently fail to see how you have hypocritical viewpoints regarding Hillary. 

I rest my case.

This is the first I'm hearing about it tbh.

You're a goddam hot mess, as is you preferred candidate 

[MJHolland 12,725]

1 hour ago, just4fun said:

If they gave me the money spent on investigating the Clinton's, I'd vote Republican forever. But why buy one vote when they can spend money investigating Hillary and brainwash the Republicans into thinking that they are doing them a favor while (today) brushing the desicion to postpone any gun control legislation, that the majority of the American people do want, under the proverbial rug. 

But hey lets go after Hillary because that's more important to Republicans.

Who is investigating Hillary's server: The FBI, the State Department (under Democrats) 

Who is not investigating the severe: Republicans

Who signs the budget to give the money to the organizations that are investigating Hillary: a democratic president

Honestly, I do not know what the f*ck you are talking about...

[brendablethyn 536]

 

[Solitaire 902]

I can't wait to see @MJHolland and @LebaneseDude get after it during the first debate between Trump and Hillary.

I'mma go stock up on popcorn rn tbh 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

2 hours ago, MJHolland said:

Who is investigating Hillary's server: The FBI, the State Department (under Democrats) 

Who is not investigating the severe: Republicans

Who signs the budget to give the money to the organizations that are investigating Hillary: a democratic president

Honestly, I do not know what the f*ck you are talking about...

"FBI is investigating"? The investigation under the FBI is over. It was under a Republican chairman, the GOP expressed confidence in his capabilities a few weeks ago, and now that he and his team decided to not follow up on charges, suddenly his integrity is held into question.

The State Department already released the results of its main investigation and now is looking into potential sanctions after waiting for the FBI's decision. Did you already forget the results of the State Department's own investigation released prior?

Now you're trying to obfuscate the results of the investigations by making the implication that the president is exerting influence into the investigations because he's a Democrat.

You talk about the Democratic pressures as if they exist in isolation. You have a Republican controlled congress that finds a Hillary witch hunt as time well spent as opposed to actually legislating for the country you supposedly like.

All the while you are forgetting that these investigations only resulted as a result of the GOP's persistent partisan attacks. Hillary's own email practices came to light as a result of the Benghazi witchhunts which after a dozen or so investigations and millions of dollars wasted all exonerated her. They failed in that and pressed forward on the e-mails despite the fact that she was not in a unique position either currently (lmao the hearings even showed that Lyin' Ryan himself has his private e-mail address on a business card) or previously (other SoS's exhibited similar behavior with no investigations) and even got the FBI involved (do you really think they saw the news and were like: Let's investigate Hillary!... someone has to call the shots), who also concluded there is no reasonable grounds for prosecution.

Now that the results are out, the GOP is still not satisfied with the decision and called for a hearing to question the decision of the FBI. The GOP then used the hearing in order to smear Hillary, even failing at that because an avid Republican (Comey) had to stand up for Hillary several times.

Straight from the horse's mouth you have someone saying that Hillary 

1) spoke the truth according to her knowledge

2) did not obstruct justice and fully cooperated

3) did not display any intentional breaking of the rules and only operated on convenience not malevolent motive

4) has a case incomparable to Patraeus since he did not do all the above and even then only received a misdemeanor

5) would not have been prosecuted for gross negligence as that has only happened once in a hundred years in a circumstance exponentially more dire than this one

Comey

1) revealed with no lack of certainty that the deleted e-mails which contained classified information did not have the appropriate "CLASSIFIED" headers in the title and therefore were not properly formed e-mails.

2) insisted that there was no White House interference

3) outright stated that no reasonable prosecutor would charge Hillary for the case.

4) kept a friendly face with the Republicans saying he understands where they come from but if they were actually part of the year long investigation they would get similar results

5) was a hair from outright calling out the Republicans from being armchair prosecutors questioning a process they barely understand only because the results weren't appealing.

...

Now the GOP is pushing for another investigation because that's what they always do, to find some bites here and there to use against Hillary because clearly the results will be same.

All the while you applaud that movement, unwittingly contributing to an waste of more taxpayer money and time, all because you're so desperate to support any smearing of Hillary because you hate her for no reason at all other than "because I said so".

Ironically, the House Republicans always end up helping Clinton because if they didn't overzealously blow every ****up Hillary has done out of proportion only to ultimately be vindicated, Hillary would have received far less sympathy for her ****ups.

So good job. Thank you for contributing to Hillary's vindication rather than doing the politically smart thing and let people **** their own reputations over (Look at Bush for example) 

 

[PartySick 172,545]

4 hours ago, Gaga Monster said:

No she hasn't. he had over 100 buisnesses and only 4 went bankrupt. And no he has never said anything bigot like, he was talking about Illegal Immigrants and only wants to ban Muslims from countries that have a proven history of terroism. I see a man who got a million and turned it into $4 billion. Our country is $19 billion in debt, minority families have fallen these past 8 years in both housing and income, and ISIS has grown significantly these past 8 years. People all over the country are suffering. It is time to change and it is time for these corrupt, lying politicians to get out of office and it is time to secure our border so undocumented people can't jump over a fence into our families neighborhoods (perfect way for terroists to get in by the way). Donald got you shook dear

His Muslim ban would apply to all Muslims...no idea how he'd tell who was Muslim and who wasn't, chances are it'd just be the brown guys from the Middle East

You see a man who was given a million, inherited millions, lied, cheated, stole, defrauded, and bankrupted for years, and turned it into four billion, which is considerably lower than the ten billion he likes to boast about but what can you expect from a guy that thinks the value of his name changes with his emotions? Besides, you can't run a country like a company. We're not the United Corporations of America and what's best for business isn't to take advantage of others' debt or make money off of their failure like Trump did. We have to succeed together because we're only as strong as our weakest link. Don't let the U.S. become his next failed business venture.

ISIS is on their knees. They're going broke, their ranks are running thin, they're loosing important territory, they've even become so desperate that their leaders are literally stealing cash from the organization. We don't need a mad man who wants to carpet bomb the Middle East ("you have to kill their families") to finish them off, we need someone who'll work with the people who've been consistently successful at killing terrorists for eight years and deliver the tactical final blows. Hillary was in the war room with Obama when they led multiple strikes. She saw what leadership looked like when he called for the go ahead to get Bin Laden. That is invaluable experience. What's Trump's experience with war? What foreign policy experience does he have that's not just owning a golf course in another country? How will his unhinged and violent attitude succeed in anything but getting us into even more wars?

The biggest problem we have right now is domestic terrorism, especially if it's inspired by ISIS propaganda. We need a smart campaign to kill their influence around the world 'cause the people themselves...they might fire off an attack or two, kill a dozen or so people here or there, but they're hardly a global threat.

Finally, the fence bit  most people who are here illegally didn't "jump a fence". They came here legally with a visa and outstayed that visa. A wall is not an immigration policy, it's a big, expensive, stupid middle finger to Mexico and its people. It's not even impassable either...they discovered a tunnel leading from the Mexican border to California, you think a wall is going to stop these people?

And don't get me started on the fact that he thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax to hurt the U.S. economy

Or that he apparently doesn't know that Air Force One is technically just any plane the president is currently on and that the DNC, not the taxpayers, pay for Obama to campaign for Hillary.

Or that he apparently thinks Muslims have some kind of hive mind and know when people like Omar Mateen are about to attack and they're not "doing their part to stop them".

Or that he wants to privatize the space agency, probably wondering how he could profit off of it rather than knowing anything about how important it is that we continue to learn and explore our universe. I'd never trust a guy who can be shown the world but only has dollar signs in his eyes.

Really, I understand if you agree with some of his stances but I'll never get why anyone would support him. He's the most unhinged, childish, offensive, lunatic....I could've never imagined someone as useless as he is getting to this point. The American people are just shooting themselves in the foot but hopefully they run out of rounds before November so we can cut our losses and go with the only real choice here. If you don't want Hillary then I'm begging you to rally behind Johnson.

Spoiler

And I find it extremely sad that tens of thousands of people can die at the end of a gun every year and congress won't do sh*t but it took them a day to kick this back up. Absolutely disgusting. I can't wait to vote out every Republican. Totally purge our government and replace them with people who have their priorities straight.

 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

6 minutes ago, PartySick said:

*snip*

King

Although I wouldn't bother. People who continue to support Trump are not worth your time.