State Department Reopens Clinton Investigation

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

18 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

When the director of the FBI describes the private server as "more vulnerable than a free Gmail account" and doesn't recommend charges, or even recommend she shouldn't have security clearance if this is how she treats classified information, or describes Hillary as not "sophisticated" (smart) enough to know her server was so vulnerable, you know the system is rigged. 

It's so funny how random your arguments always are. 

How is the security of the server in comparison to Gmail of any relevance to begin with?

Not to mention you ignore the rest of his statement:

“Yes, and I’m not looking to pick on Gmail. Their security is actually pretty good. The weakness is in the individual users. But, yes, Gmail has full time security staff, and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here.”

His opinion is that it is more vulnerable because of a lack of a full time security staff.

I'll put this in simple terms so you can understand it. One can just as easily make the argument that a security staff of that scale is inherently required when handling billions of users. Also the bigger the server, the more loopholes there are that need to be closed. For a server with few users, such staff is not necessary. 

There's also the fact that Comey himself did not mention that Google uses multiple servers, not just one, so that inherently also requires more staff and more caution due to the risks of interconnected components.

So his statement for anyone with a lick of computer security knowledge is simply that she doesn't have a Google-level server field, which any idiot could have told you.

The man isn't incorrect. However the relevance of that comparison is so off base  

It's at the very least as secure as the State Department's server, so trying to use safety as a criterion falls flat pretty quickly. 

----

Also are you seriously trying to shade Hillary, a relatively older person, for her lack of knowledge in the intricacies of computer security?

Man you're pathetic lmao... how is it not difficult for you to understand that Hillary would not have a sophisticated understanding of computer security, when you probably don't have it either.

No you aren't an expert just because you installed an antivirus dear.

[PaperIz 7,354]

But I'm sure they'll tell me the email scandal is nothing and we should still support this crooked woman. I'd rather vote a rock into office than these 2 bafoons running.

[MJHolland 12,725]

2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

It's so funny how random your arguments always are. 

How is the security of the server in comparison to Gmail of any relevance to begin with?

Not to mention you ignore the rest of his statement:

“Yes, and I’m not looking to pick on Gmail. Their security is actually pretty good. The weakness is in the individual users. But, yes, Gmail has full time security staff, and thinks about patching and logging and protecting their systems in a way that was not the case here.”

His opinion is that it is more vulnerable because of a lack of a full time security staff. One can just as easily make the argument that a security staff of that scale is inherently required when handling billions of users. Also the bigger the server, the more loopholes there are that need to be closed. For a server with few users, such staff is not necessary.

So his statement for anyone with a lick of computer security knowledge is simply that she doesn't have a Google-level server, which any idiot could have told you.

The man isn't incorrect. However the relevance of that comparison is so off base  

It's at the very least as secure as the State Department's server, so trying to use safety as a criterion falls flat pretty quickly. 

----

Also are you seriously trying to shade Hillary, a relatively older person, for her lack of knowledge in the intricacies of computer securityt?

Man you're pathetic lmao... how is it not difficult for you to understand that Hillary would not have a sophisticated understanding of computer security, when you probably don't have it either.

No you aren't an expert just because you installed an antivirus dear.

I holder her to a higher standard because she was secretary of f*cking state and she was housing classified information on a server that had abysmal security protocol because I'm not a f*cking moron. 

Anyways, Hillary swore under oath that she never sent classified information over the server. At the very least she's going to be tried with perjury. Can't wait for Clinton impeachment round 2! This is what happens when you think you're over the law so you try to save face in front of Congress!!! 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

12 hours ago, Gaga Monster said:

No she hasn't. he had over 100 buisnesses and only 4 went bankrupt. And no he has never said anything bigot like, he was talking about Illegal Immigrants and only wants to ban Muslims from countries that have a proven history of terroism. I see a man who got a million and turned it into $4 billion. Our country is $19 billion in debt, minority families have fallen these past 8 years in both housing and income, and ISIS has grown significantly these past 8 years. People all over the country are suffering. It is time to change and it is time for these corrupt, lying politicians to get out of office and it is time to secure our border so undocumented people can't jump over a fence into our families neighborhoods (perfect way for terroists to get in by the way). Donald got you shook dear

RIP you ignoring Trump university, the fact that most of his businesses have FAILED, the fact that four of those failures were SO HUGE he had to file for bankruptcies is nothing to be proud of, him starting off with millions of dollars of capital gave him a lot of lee-way and a cushion whenever he failed, and assuming that just because he is actually much less rich than he claimed to be as we can see from his released statements that he'll be able to solve the USA's problems.

You inserting a hor emoticon doesn't make your paragraph any cuter dear. You don't try to change the country by supporting someone who is homophobic, transphobic, misogynistic, jingoist, xenophobic, racist, and borderline sociopathic.

You are too cute. It's going to be fun when the cheeto-faced ferret-face shitgibbon gets his due.

[MJHolland 12,725]

3 minutes ago, PaperIz said:

But I'm sure they'll tell me the email scandal is nothing and we should still support this crooked woman. I'd rather vote a rock into office than these 2 bafoons running.

Watch out, if you use logic and reasoning, @LebaneseDude is going to call you "pathetic"!

Spoiler

Even though I think we all know who that description applies to 

 

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

1 minute ago, MJHolland said:

I holder her to a higher standard because she was secretary of f*cking state and she was housing classified information on a server that had abysmal security protocol because I'm not a f*cking moron. 

Anyways, Hillary swore under oath that she never sent classified information over the server. At the very least she's going to be tried with perjury. Can't wait for Clinton impeachment round 2! This is what happens when you think you're over the law so you try to save face in front of Congress!!! 

Preach!!

[brendablethyn 536]

If she had any sense of leadership and respect for future generations she would step aside and let another Democrat be the nominee. She just can't win with all this scandal she creates, and her attitude on this whole matter has been very concerning from a mental health point of view. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

4 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

I holder her to a higher standard because she was secretary of f*cking state and she was housing classified information on a server that had abysmal security protocol because I'm not a f*cking moron. 

Anyways, Hillary swore under oath that she never sent classified information over the server. At the very least she's going to be tried with perjury. Can't wait for Clinton impeachment round 2! This is what happens when you think you're over the law so you try to save face in front of Congress!!! 

No you hold her to a higher standard because you're looking for ways to put her down as your options continue to decrease as Hillary gets more and more vindicated, only contradicting your previous statements and displaying desperate irrational animus.

Now you're trying to hold her accountable for "perjury" when that fails to consider that one can say incorrect statements while believing they did so differently.

For example it's true that she said that didn't delete e-mails with classified information. The FBI director said there were three emails that were deleted that had classified information. Three out of hundreds of thousands. The GOP tried to frame that as a lie. Then it was pointed out that the HEADERS did not have "CLASSIFIED" in the title and therefore it is quite easy to miss the classified information marked with a (C).

That's one example of many.

She did not obstruct justice.

She did not engage in criminal behavior.

She did not have motive or intent.

In fact Comey outright stated that the only apparent reason she did it was for convenience and he even conceded that the Department's own servers and practices were out of date and would have inhibited her in her duties as someone working in the 21st century.

Stop calling yourself an independent. You belong with the Republican trash heap.

[MJHolland 12,725]

2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

RIP you ignoring Trump university, the fact that most of his businesses have FAILED, the fact that four of those failures were SO HUGE he had to file for bankruptcies is nothing to be proud of, him starting off with millions of dollars of capital gave him a lot of lee-way and a cushion whenever he failed, and assuming that just because he is actually much rich than he claimed to be as we can see from his released statements that he'll be able to solve the USA's problems.

You inserting a hor emoticon doesn't make your paragraph any cuter dear. You don't try to change the country by supporting someone who is homophobic, transphobic, misogynistic, jingoist, xenophobic, racist, and borderline sociopathic.

You are too cute. It's going to be fun when the cheeto-faced ferret-face shitgibbon gets his due.

This is what happens when you can't actually come up with any argument whatsoever. You just start calling people every name in the book from sexist to homophobic, even though Trump has a better and longer track record for gay and trans rights that Hillary... LOLOLOL

Hmm, strategic bailouts for casinos is as bad a compromising state secrets and national security??? Now THAT is a pathetic analysis. 

[Born To Slay 10,996]

1 minute ago, MJHolland said:

This is what happens when you can't actually come up with any argument whatsoever. You just start calling people every name in the book from sexist to homophobic, even though Trump has a better and longer track record for gay and trans rights that Hillary... LOLOLOL

Hmm, strategic bailouts for casinos is as bad a compromising state secrets and national security??? Now THAT is a pathetic analysis. 

I don't like Hillary but no he doesn't 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

2 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

This is what happens when you can't actually come up with any argument whatsoever. You just start calling people every name in the book from sexist to homophobic, even though Trump has a better and longer track record for gay and trans rights that Hillary... LOLOLOL

Hmm, strategic bailouts for casinos is as bad a compromising state secrets and national security??? Now THAT is a pathetic analysis. 

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS 

DO I NEED TO PROVE TRUMP TO YOU NOW?

How ignorant are you? Jesus Christ. Have the last 8 months taught you nothing?

Not you actually saying that the person who is courting anti-LGBT people and literally just came out in support of HB2 after supposedly being on the right side is better in gay and trans rights than someone who has never opposed LGBT rights (at worst not supporting it fully) and at best has been on the forefront of LGBT advancements and HIV treatment.

I swear the more this goes on the more you look like a clueless hypocrite.

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

RIP you ignoring Trump university, the fact that most of his businesses have FAILED, the fact that four of those failures were SO HUGE he had to file for bankruptcies is nothing to be proud of, him starting off with millions of dollars of capital gave him a lot of lee-way and a cushion whenever he failed, and assuming that just because he is actually much rich than he claimed to be as we can see from his released statements that he'll be able to solve the USA's problems.

You inserting a hor emoticon doesn't make your paragraph any cuter dear. You don't try to change the country by supporting someone who is homophobic, transphobic, misogynistic, jingoist, xenophobic, racist, and borderline sociopathic.

You are too cute. It's going to be fun when the cheeto-faced ferret-face shitgibbon gets his due.

4/over 100 is not most, it is a great record! He started off with a loan of $1 million and turned it into $4 billion. And he is not any of those things you described. Telling the truth does not make you a racist and whatever else you said. And no, I will not vote for someone who has lied under oath and has constantly told the American people lies about her emails and thinks she is above the law. The Democrat policies have not worked these past 8 years. 19 trillion dollars in debt, minority and majority families falling from housing and income, and ISIS containment stategies failed horribly. Politicians are corrupt and lie even under oath. We need to take a risk and vote a successful outsider who can hopefully turn this country around, because voting the same system and same peson only makes matters worse.

 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

4 minutes ago, brendablethyn said:

If she had any sense of leadership and respect for future generations she would step aside and let another Democrat be the nominee. She just can't win with all this scandal she creates, and her attitude on this whole matter has been very concerning from a mental health point of view. 

Yes she should stop doing what she does because the GOP doesn't like her and has consistently failed to incriminate her.

She is going to win. Deal with it.

[MJHolland 12,725]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

No you hold her to a higher standard because you're looking for ways to put her down as your options continue to decrease as Hillary gets more and more vindicated.

Now you're trying to hold her accountable for "perjury" when that fails to consider that one can say incorrect statements while believing they did so differently.

For example it's true that she said that didn't delete e-mails with classified information. The FBI director said there were three emails that were deleted that had classified information. Three out of hundreds of thousands. The GOP tried to frame that as a lie. Then it was pointed out that the HEADERS did not have "CLASSIFIED" in the title and therefore it is quite easy to miss the classified information marked with a (C).

That's one example of many.

She did not obstruct justice.

She did not engage in criminal behavior.

She did not have motive or intent.

In fact Comey outright stated that the only apparent reason she did it was for convenience and he even conceded that the Department's own servers and practices were out of date and would have inhibited her in her duties as someone working in the 21st century.

You don't even think it's fishy that Huma said it wasn't for convenience? While under oath?! Why the f*ck would she risk jail time to slander her boss? A fellow Dem? Someone who she's endorsed for president?!

Like you honestly have no objective analytical skills whatsoever and it'e terrifying.

You think the FBI report vindicated her?!?!?! HAHAHAHAHAHAH. BUDDY. IT PROVED THAT SHE'S LIED ABOUT EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THIS SCANDAL FROM THE BEGINNING. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. 

Can you honestly think of one thing she HASN'T lied about when it comes to this scandal?! She said, UNDER OATH, that she and her team of lawyers went through EVERY email and didn't delete anything work related, and then the FBI comes back and finds thousands of examples that she shouldn't have deleted.

And then you have to think of why she even deleted a SINGLE damn email when she knew the FBI would have to look at every single one because she KNEW it was wrong for her to have a private server!

You hold her to a terrifyingly low standard just because you want her to beat Trump, and that's exactly how corrupt people who think they're above the law get into office. 

[President Biden 5,898]

28 minutes ago, Gaga Monster said:

So true!!

Wait Gaga Monster. Are you a Rebupilican