Roomingfree77 244 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 10 hours ago, JDi said: the future of music is in touring and festivals, not streaming, so she needs to stop trying to disguise her greed as care and go record some good stadium music. no one's gonna pay for her dated tunes in 5 years. that's right gotta have a show these days cuz nobody is gonna buy an album when they is all free to begin with Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marina Braxton 71 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 oh taylor pizz off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnnTakamaki 6,871 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Gaga on it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HEARTHUNTER 7,611 Posted June 22, 2016 Author Share Posted June 22, 2016 5 hours ago, Sara said: OH MA GOD!!!! I just read the full text of the petition! It doesn't mention YouTube at all!! The original article has got to be THE most misleading thing EVER! The article title should not be "Taylor Swift at war with YouTube", it should be "Huge list of artists want to alter the DMCA". Maybe I should change the thread title. (Sorry OP, not blaming you, I was totally suckered by the article too!) Updated the thread title Well yeah I was a bit confused but I understood the whole deal now Spoiler Quite pressed for getting warned just for quoting the whole article Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LePetitGAGABLover 21,234 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 1 minute ago, HEARTHUNTER said: Updated the thread title Well yeah I was a bit confused but I understood the whole deal now Hide contents Quite pressed for getting warned just for quoting the whole article You got warned for that? Warning points on this site are given like candy on Halloween Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HEARTHUNTER 7,611 Posted June 22, 2016 Author Share Posted June 22, 2016 Just now, LePetitMonstr said: You got warned for that? Warning points on this site are given like candy on Halloween Well it wasn't specified in any of the sections that quoting the whole article would be subject to warnings My bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 110,010 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 12 hours ago, T E A said: not that i have any doubt but i hope gagz stays the fünk away from this, like she did with flopdal. Not this time. MoneyGa is here. (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ hating pop music doesn't make you deep (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weed 74,301 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Lmao what do y'all think now that Gaga's with her? Overreacting for no reason. Who's being hurt by this? People who upload copyrighted material? Sucks for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul 687 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 12 hours ago, BrianxRyan said: She has shown her support for the LGBT and even local celebrities such as Kesha in the past. I would imagine she probably donated to the cause, but she doesn't put all her business out there when it comes to donations. She did the same thing as Gaga which was tweet and may not have just been able to speak in front of a crowd of gays for a vigil that takes a lot of strength. Support is support at the any of the day and gagadaily and others need to stop measuring it. I appreciate her saying SOMETHING, when she didn't have to say anything. My point was she could've went the whole way, and really mentioned and driven it home that she agrees it was a hate crime on LGBT on this occasion when many people have *offensively* stated otherwise Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Ryan 1,468 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 1 hour ago, paul said: I appreciate her saying SOMETHING, when she didn't have to say anything. My point was she could've went the whole way, and really mentioned and driven it home that she agrees it was a hate crime on LGBT on this occasion when many people have *offensively* stated otherwise Everyone has made it clear that it's that way... either way she paid tribute. The end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roomingfree77 244 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 6 hours ago, HEARTHUNTER said: Updated the thread title Well yeah I was a bit confused but I understood the whole deal now Reveal hidden contents Quite pressed for getting warned just for quoting the whole article You don't get to play Shortstop in this league unless the Coach has faith in your skills to always do the right thing at a high rate of success..*Nice play Swifty!/Claps* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 They better pay congress the big bucks to make change then. That's how it goes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronk 14,762 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 There is no problem with copyrights and royalties. Artists should be paid for their work. However, youtube has a serious problem with how they enforce this. An automated program scans everything posted on youtube and compares it with with the audio of all copyrighted songs. If the program finds a match, youtube takes action by either removing the video or posting ads on it and blocking it from being viewed on mobile devices. The problem is that even a small portion of a copyrighted song causes this action, and no human looks at it to determine the circumstances. One person videoed his baby taking its first steps. He posted it on youtube for family and friends to see. But when he was taking the video, someone in another room was listening to the radio and a copyrighted song was playing. The music had nothing at all to do with the video, but the video was blocked by youtube. I watched someone's video about Gaga which contained in the background very small segments of several Gaga songs. One of the songs I didn't recognize was very catchy, so I purchased it on amazon. So this song snippet gained Gaga a sale of the entire song, it did not cost her a sale. I make my own videos about Gaga which also contain small portions of several songs as background, and I'm quite certain that nobody is going to use a snippet instead of purchasing the song. If anything, it will gain Gaga sales. Yet youtube posted ads on my videos and blocked them from mobile devices. It's good that copyright laws allow artists to gain royalties from their work, but youtube's methodology needs fixing. I live outside the space time continuum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roomingfree77 244 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 53 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said: They better pay congress the big bucks to make change then. That's how it goes. that aint even close to plan "A" if you ask me.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
and i oop 1,360 Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 This really annoys me. Why is Cher on here!?! She doesn't even really have a VEVO! So would all of her old videos just get deleted from all of Youtube? Madonna and Nicki Minaj are the only singers I'm a fan of that aren't on the list. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.