Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Senate votes down four gun control measures


PartySick

Featured Posts

3 minutes ago, warpedcurrents said:

Dumb buffoons :neyde: 

Can't wait for them to be voted out of office 

Me if I ever run into one of them tumblr_ma3vyaUyTE1qhuy9mo1_400.gif

 

me tbh

3rsB96.gif

****ing idiots

...ıllıllı c h e r r y c h e r r y b o o m b o o m ıllıllı...
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
PartySick
4 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

I just went to a gun show last month. I don't think registering guns should be mandatory.

I do :duck:

We had a story on our local news about two days ago (pretty sure I posted a status about it?) where a 13 year old boy tried to buy alcohol, cigarettes, and lotto tickets for his (tragic) parents but was turned away. He went to a gun show and walked out with a 22 caliber rifle. No ID, no parents, they just gave him the gun and took the money. I really don't think that's ok :duck:

3 minutes ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

This. I'm not sure how you can justify blocking the first 3 tbh :air: 

No to more background checks spending? It will help them be more efficient and effective :rip:

No to gun show loopholes so people who are unfit to own guns can go around the system and get them anyway? :wtf:

The third one seems like a half-way point to the 4th one, but I think it's okay; it didnt elaborate on how much of a "delay" there is or would be, but I think im for it. I am with you on the 4th one; it seems a bit hypocritical to the whole "Everyone has the right to own a gun!" thing, even if I get the rationale, the NSA, FBI, etc. get stuff wrong ALL of the time and I'd hate to be a lets say totally innocent Muslim-American who can't own a gun but actually needs one for whatever reason just because they messed up.

Wasnt Bernie heavily against especially the gun show thing? :duck: 

Well, when your pockets are being lined by people who want you to do everything you can to make getting a gun as easy as possible, you'd stoop to any low, even sacrificing common sense and safety :shrug:

Someone here said they put a 7 month old on the watch list :rip: so yeah, it definitely needs to be worked on before it's taken seriously.

I'm sure he spoke out against it. He actually voted in this (the entire senate did for the first time this year). He probably voted for each one but apparently both Democrats and Republicans went against the grain of their parties. Idk, I haven't found what each voted for or against yet.

Whimsical bitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
1 minute ago, just4fun said:

Why?

Well, for the same reason I don't think the government should have lists of church memberships. If the government were to outlaw guns entirely to the public, they'd have a list of every home to visit. Much like how the nazi's used Jewish temples membership to coincide with their own genocidal agenda. I want to be clear, I'm not saying that people with guns are going to be persecuted or something :emma: But, you never know how things may change, how power struggles will end. If we want to secure our availability to take control of an oppressive government.

I do, however, support heavy gun laws on automatic weapons.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
11 minutes ago, PartySick said:

I do :duck:

We had a story on our local news about two days ago (pretty sure I posted a status about it?) where a 13 year old boy tried to buy alcohol, cigarettes, and lotto tickets for his (tragic) parents but was turned away. He went to a gun show and walked out with a 22 caliber rifle. No ID, no parents, they just gave him the gun and took the money. I really don't think that's ok :duck:

Well rest assured, I don't support selling guns to anyone that doesn't have a concealed weapons licence and is at the legal age to carry concealed. This does, however seem like a 2-part issue. He shouldn't have been sold the gun, but also, where were his tragic parents? (also, where is this guy getting enough money for a 22 caliber rifle :rip: )

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin
6 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Well, for the same reason I don't think the government should have lists of church memberships. If the government were to outlaw guns entirely to the public, they'd have a list of every home to visit. Much like how the nazi's used Jewish temples membership to coincide with their own genocidal agenda. I want to be clear, I'm not saying that people with guns are going to be persecuted or something :emma: But, you never know how things may change, how power struggles will end. If we want to secure our availability to take control of an oppressive government.

I do, however, support heavy gun laws on automatic weapons.

Girl you drank the Kool-Aid. You know we register every car we own too and they are not lethal weapons. You have to register to vote too. 

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
Just now, just4fun said:

Girl you drank the Kool-Aid. You know we register every car we own too and they at not lethal weapons. You have to register to vote too. 

There's much more to it than that. Believe me, I haven't touched any sugary aided beverages.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
2 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Well rest assured, I don't support selling guns to anyone that doesn't have a concealed weapons licence and is at the legal age to carry concealed. This does, however seem like a 2-part issue. He shouldn't have been sold the gun, but also, where were his tragic parents? (also, where is this guy getting enough money for a 22 caliber rifle :rip: )

Hell if I know :rip:

7 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Well, for the same reason I don't think the government should have lists of church memberships. If the government were to outlaw guns entirely to the public, they'd have a list of every home to visit. Much like how the nazi's used Jewish temples membership to coincide with their own genocidal agenda. I want to be clear, I'm not saying that people with guns are going to be persecuted or something :emma: But, you never know how things may change, how power struggles will end. If we want to secure our availability to take control of an oppressive government.

I do, however, support heavy gun laws on automatic weapons.

I mean...you have a point? But I think that's a bit paranoid :emma: I'd rather have safety and regulation over the unlikely fear that the government will suddenly turn tyrannical and try to oppress all of its citizens. Besides, a bunch of citizens with the guns we're allowed to own? We have nothing on the U.S. Army :air: assuming the majority of them don't just defect and refuse to work for that hypothetical oppressive government. I don't think that's something we have to realistically fear :ohno:

Whimsical bitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

JustinTrudeau

I knew it, if the government won't change their policies after little kids at Sandy Hook were murdered, nothing will convince them :neyde:

As an outsider, I don't get it. I really don't get it :saladga: I wish NRA can just eff off. I wish the whole "we must have guns, it's our rights" can eff off. Ugh.

Nothing is easy, unless you have money :neyde:

I fell down the stairs once as an actor.
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
1 minute ago, PartySick said:

Hell if I know :rip:

I mean...you have a point? But I think that's a bit paranoid :emma: I'd rather have safety and regulation over the unlikely fear that the government will suddenly turn tyrannical and try to oppress all of its citizens. Besides, a bunch of citizens with the guns we're allowed to own? We have nothing on the U.S. Army :air: assuming the majority of them don't just defect and refuse to work for that hypothetical oppressive government. I don't think that's something we have to realistically fear :ohno:

Paranoid, yes, but a paranoia that will work well for us in the long run. It's realistic as long as we still have mass amounts of the public uninterested in voting, and figures such as Trump easily winning nominations for presidency.

We don't have anything on the US military, no, but a large chunk of the US military is pro-guns, so it stands to reason that they would fight against a government attempting to force the kool-aid down our throats. There's a safe compromise between the two.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

AJH219

Bastards :awkney: But, really, is anyone surprised? If elementary school kids being shot dead in their classrooms didn't spark change, what makes anyone think a massacre a gay club will? Maybe I'm just jaded and hopeless at this point, but alas another tragedy will come and go with no action by the government. 

'All our dreams can come true IF we have the courage to pursue them'-Walt Disney
Link to post
Share on other sites

Goosey
55 minutes ago, PartySick said:

-In 1st vote, the US Senate blocks measure to increase funding and resources for national background check system

This failed because it was bundled together with a law that would prevent people on the secret, flawed terrorist watchlist from purchasing guns.

51 minutes ago, PartySick said:

-In 2nd vote, the US Senate blocks measure expanding national background check system to close “gun show loophole"

There is no "gun show loophole" and universal background checks wouldn't work without a national registry. Punch this one down, Senate!

54 minutes ago, PartySick said:

-In 3rd vote, the US Senate blocks measure to delay gun purchases for suspected terrorists while seeking court ruling on sale

"A right delayed is a right denied."

54 minutes ago, PartySick said:

-In 4th vote, the US Senate blocks measure to prevent individuals on terror watch list from buying a gun

Excellent news. No one should be deprived of their constitutional rights because they were placed on a secret list approved by secret FISA courts.

 

"What’s interesting to note is that for a number of the amendments, which would have given the Democrats exactly what they were asking (blocking those on the “no fly” list from buying firearms) the vote was split along party lines with nearly every Republican voting in the affirmative, but the Democrats themselves blocked it from passing."

"I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump
Link to post
Share on other sites

Zilla

Disgusted with the people that represent my country. I won't go into detail past that.

However those NJ senators did us right :woot:

𝙸'𝚖 𝚊 𝚓𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚓𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕.
Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude

I find it weird that some Sanders supporters are fine with this.

FT_gunproposals_15.01.05.png

The majority of people support these regulations yet they aren't being implemented. 

I thought many Sanders supporters entire gimmick was that democracies should reflect the will of the people not lobbyists like the NRA.

Christ be consistent....

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

President Biden
1 hour ago, Zilla said:

Disgusted with the people that represent my country. I won't go into detail past that.

However those NJ senators did us right 

Yassss my Norcross, Booker, Menedez are truly savage liberals  

I got drunk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...