Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Google caught covering up for Clinton


Emvee

Featured Posts

LePetitGAGABLover
6 minutes ago, Rising said:

At least I don't make rude comments about people I don't know. 

What a hypocrite! You don't know me but you still made a rude comment towards me. Take a sit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
HighlandHeart

 

9 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

Rising is not a Hillary supporter. :toofunny: 

To quote Oscar Wilde: “Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people we personally dislike.”

Hillary has done nothing objectively immoral with regards to the election and is not winning by rigging the democracy in any shape or form. Four million voters and overwhelming victories at primaries attest to that.

If you believe otherwise, show me the proof.

"Google's got the Kween's back. The presidency is hers... Shake it up, hunties" ...and you blame me for thinking this is support?

Please don't misquote a god to suit this woman's means. If you really need to quote about how 'elusive' and 'uncertain' morality is in order to justify your support, you might want to consider questioning why you support her a bit more. 

I read that you said google search doesn't acknowledge searches for an indictment because she hasn't been indicted yet. Bollocks. People all over the world are constantly searching for it. News is constantly reported about her potential indictment. If you really think with her power and money and monetary partnerships with the guy at google doesn't help her in the slightest you are completely deluded. 

Instead of constantly trying to defend the indefensible, constantly saying that she's not convicted yet, how about trying to engage your imagination to the tiniest degree so that you can understand WHY people bring it up. It's not about getting rid of the opposition, because it's people in my country who don't want her to be president either and we have no say. 

I don't know too much about it all, and I don't mind anyone supporting her, but I'd like to hope that people who claim to be sane and democratic voters wouldn't be so flippant and jovial about a potential criminal potentially running such an influential nation! 

If you don't have shadows you're not standing in the light.
Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude
19 minutes ago, Drunk Poet said:

 

"Google's got the Kween's back. The presidency is hers... Shake it up, hunties" ...and you blame me for thinking this is support?

Please don't misquote a god to suit this woman's means. If you really need to quote about how 'elusive' and 'uncertain' morality is in order to justify your support, you might want to consider questioning why you support her a bit more. 

 

I'm not so naive as to think that politicians are beings of moral righteousness. The position itself demands more than the average person can often do. 

19 minutes ago, Drunk Poet said:

 

I read that you said google search doesn't acknowledge searches for an indictment because she hasn't been indicted yet. Bollocks. People all over the world are constantly searching for it. News is constantly reported about her potential indictment. If you really think with her power and money and monetary partnerships with the guy at google doesn't help her in the slightest you are completely deluded. 

Which people? The media which is always looking for an easy Clinton sell? The GOP which has failed with witch hunt after witch hunt with the Clinton? Or is it the Sanders supporters looking for the only way for their failed candidate to win the nomination?

I don't claim to know what goes on behind the scenes. That's not the point. I'm telling you not to assume that something is going on, however. That's the point. Lack of information does not equal doubt, unless you're paranoid.

19 minutes ago, Drunk Poet said:

 

 

Instead of constantly trying to defend the indefensible, constantly saying that she's not convicted yet, how about trying to engage your imagination to the tiniest degree so that you can understand WHY people bring it up. It's not about getting rid of the opposition, because it's people in my country who don't want her to be president either and we have no say. 

"Defend the indefensible"?

Tell me how this entire video isn't stitched from circumstantial evidence that has already been disproven.

The only reason people feel compelled to bring these issues up nowadays is either:

1) GOP looking for ways to trash arguably their biggest enemy in the Democratic Party

2) Sanders supporters looking for ways to justify how much they hate someone they barely know

3) Media personnel feeding on the above to sell stories

You don't want her as president? That's great. Don't vote her in. Apparently the overwhelming majority want her for president. The ones who actually went and voted for Sanders had their say because they participated, but they didn't get anything out of it cause they lost.

Do you want a participation award?

19 minutes ago, Drunk Poet said:

 

I don't know too much about it all, and I don't mind anyone supporting her,

Thanks for understanding,

19 minutes ago, Drunk Poet said:

but I'd like to hope that people who claim to be sane and democratic voters wouldn't be so flippant and jovial about a potential criminal potentially running such an influential nation! 

Oh nevermind I take that back. You admit to being clueless a sentence earlier but then you call people who believe in Clinton insane, undemocratic, flippant, and jovial. Anything else?

Perhaps we aren't so gullible to believe all the smears that she has been subjected to throughout these years?

Perhaps we admire that she's a fighter? Someone who has been able to withstand these assaults for over 25 years while accomplishing so much and speaking out for liberal values and human rights for years, all while playing the game and actually getting **** done as opposed to standing on the sidelines and letting it all go to hell.

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
2 hours ago, Rising said:

 

"Hillary indictment" being a offensive makes no sense other than to cover up for her. Or is she not under FBI investigation?

 

The "death threats" comment though :toofunny:

Google does suggest "Hillary Clinton indictment for emails" tho. The only thing you need to do is type "Hillary Clinton indi" but you also have to write "OJ Simpson indi" to get "OJ Simpson indictment". 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...