Hillary Has Clinched The Nomination

[Goosey 3,017]

23 minutes ago, DIVA said:

You do realize Trump has said we should go back to using torture again, even saying he would use worse than waterboarding, and that he would blow up not only suspected terrorsits, but also their families (innocents). 

He hasn't done it, though. Obama has. 

[Whispering 18,865]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

Yep voter suppression is good, especially those of minorities 

They are "low information voters".  

[Guest]

2 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

The media is reporting that Clinton has clinched the nomination and is the presumptive nominee.

Tell me how her being the presumptive nominee is not a fact?

1. We have Primaries tomorrow lol, specifically in California where Bernie has a great chance at winning

 

2. Neither of them have a path to victory without Super Delegates

 

3. The Nominee is decided at the Convention in July & the Super Delegates vote in July, not June, JULY!!!!! A huge chunk of these Super Delegates pledged to vote for Hillary before Bernie came in or before Iowa & many of the Super Delegates have yet to switch over even from States he won (Washington)

 

Please enlighten me on how our media actually isn't corrupt, truthful & on our side :-)

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

49 minutes ago, ALEXANDRE said:

1. We have Primaries tomorrow lol, specifically in California where Bernie has a great chance at winning

 

2. Neither of them have a path to victory without Super Delegates

3. The Nominee is decided at the Convention in July & the Super Delegates vote in July, not June, JULY!!!!! A huge chunk of these Super Delegates pledged to vote for Hillary before Bernie came in or before Iowa & many of the Super Delegates have yet to switch over even from States he won (Washington)

Please enlighten me on how our media actually isn't corrupt, truthful & on our side :-)

Why are you distorting the truth to fit your agenda?

Great chance at winning? Based on what information? Every poll states otherwise. In the event Sanders does win, it will be with such a slim margin that it will be a hollow one at best.

In any case, who cares?

Hillary has enough pledged delegate and unpledged delegate commitments to make her the PRESUMPTIVE nominee as the media is reporting.

She is not the official nominee. Neither is Trump. The point is moot.

No Democratic party candidate has ever won without superdelegates. The entire quota is based on both types of delegates. 

She has hit the quota and will only surpass it as she garners more pledged delegates from the remaining states, and more superdelegates from neutral ones to ones that supported Sanders.

Do you even know what superdelegates are? They aren't moody supporters who switch their support based on a whim. They are political figures who know the setting and understand context. Hillary is ahead in pledged delegates AND the popular vote, unlike Obama, is doing very well against the opponent, unlike Obama who was actually polling poorly against Romney, and is doing amazingly against Trump in swing states.

Yet lo and behold....Obama had a lead in delegates so he won despite all that.

Even Sanders endorsed Obama a mere two days after he hit the delegate count way before the convention.

Because guess what...no votes are actually counted yet, but they are all committed, even the unpledged ones. That's what they do. They endorse a candidate. Their vote is as good as a pledged one UNTIL they state otherwise. They don't just change their minds out of the blue.

If you think that it has defaulted to Hillary, then all I have to tell you is "no ****".

If you think Sanders,

1) the very person who has insulted the Democratic party for YEARS

2) and who had outright claimed that he'd never work with them,

3) the same person who eventually came to THEIR side while continuing to mock them

4) who joined THEIR primary process and constantly cried tears of rigging when every fact checker stated otherwise.

5) and attacked the party, culminating in his epic bullshit against Barney Frank recently where they finally put their foot down because he had GROSSLY overstepped his bounds,

AMONG OTHER THINGS,

will EVER convince the remaining superdelegates to give up Hillary when she has checked every single checkbox for the nomination from pledge delegates to polling and is now the presumed nominee, you my friend, are delusional.

It's not biased for the media to say it as it as they have through EVERY democratic race in the past.

Stop trying to paint Sanders as an exception. The only exception he is is the one who betrayed his own principles to join a party and expected them to play by his rules.

[Eighteen 5,430]

i say again, i want a bernie as veep that is like a dream ticket *_*

[SychosSoChic 9,995]

39 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Why are you distorting the truth to fit your agenda?

Great chance at winning? Based on what information? Every poll states otherwise. In the event Sanders does win, it will be with such a slim margin that it will be a hollow one at best.

In any case, who cares?

Hillary has enough pledged delegate and unpledged delegate commitments to make her the PRESUMPTIVE nominee as the media is reporting.

She is not the official nominee. Neither is Trump. The point is moot.

No Democratic party candidate has ever won without superdelegates. The entire quota is based on both types of delegates. 

She has hit the quota and will only surpass it as she garners more pledged delegates from the remaining states, and more superdelegates from neutral ones to ones that supported Sanders.

Do you even know what superdelegates are? They aren't moody supporters who switch their support based on a whim. They are political figures who know the setting and understand context. Hillary is ahead in pledged delegates AND the popular vote, unlike Obama, is doing very well against the opponent, unlike Obama who was actually polling poorly against Romney, and is doing amazingly against Trump in swing states, unlike Obama.

Yet lo and behold....Obama had a lead in delegates so he won despite all that.

Even Sanders endorsed Obama a mere two days after he hit the delegate count way before the convention.

Because guess what...no votes are actually counted yet, but they are all committed, even the unpledged ones. That's what they do. They endorse a candidate. Their vote is as good as a pledged one UNTIL they state otherwise. They don't just change their minds out of the blue.

If you think that it has defaulted to Hillary, then all I have to tell you is "no ****".

If you think Sanders,

1) the very person who has insulted the Democratic party for YEARS

2) and who had outright claimed that he'd never work with them,

3) the same person who eventually came to THEIR side while continuing to mock them

4) who joined THEIR primary process and constantly cried tears of rigging when every fact checker stated otherwise.

5) and attacked the party, culminating in his epic bullshit against Barney Frank recently where they finally put their foot down because he had GROSSLY overstepped his bounds,

AMONG OTHER THINGS,

will EVER convince the remaining superdelegates to give up Hillary when she has checked every single checkbox for the nomination from pledge delegates to polling and is now the presumed nominee, you my friend, are delusional.

It's not biased for the media to say it as it as they have through EVERY democratic race in the past.

Stop trying to paint Sanders as an exception. The only exception he is is the one who betrayed his own principles to join a party and expected them to play by his rules.

DADDY YOU'VE GOTTEN SO AGGRESSIVE

I live

Spill the camomile tea AND my decaffe flat white lattè all over the thread

[BlondeQueenOfGGD 25,454]

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSS

[HighlandHeart 993]

8 hours ago, TrumpAteMyHeart said:

OMG imagine if Bernie wins Cali tomorrow then. Will be even more embarrassing!

THIS GIF

I'M CRYING

[JanPianoMusic 730]

Obv

[Bt1 5,213]

Watch her supporters stay home. Bernie wins California and the mess continues because of this. I will be happy 12 hours from now.

[Bt1 5,213]

4 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

 

I dont know from where do you still have the energy to continue, but congratulations. You simply raised the bar on GGD about elections.

[Emvee 8,834]

Should have expected this dirty tactic. This was put on blast now just to discourage people from voting for Bernie in California. Her delegate number hasn't changed, but somehow this makes headlines now? Lol ok

[PopBitch 1,218]

9 hours ago, Whispering said:

Interesting big of information: Back in 2008, Bernie as a Superdelegate, pledged his vote to Obama at this point in the race because he said it was obvious that Obama was the nominee. Obama wasn't even ahead in the popular vote at that time.

Funny how Bernie believed one thing in 2008 and now is claiming something completely different! He supported the system and was part of the voting he is calling "rigged" now. He helped "rig" the system for Obama back in 2008, but now he is saying it is unfair to do so. Which is it, Bernie?  

Preach.

[Tokyo Rose 1,475]

She should run for Queen of Amerexico 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 hour ago, Rising said:

Should have expected this dirty tactic. This was put on blast now just to discourage people from voting for Bernie in California. Her delegate number hasn't changed, but somehow this makes headlines now? Lol ok

Er actually this is bad for Clinton because some will just assume their vote doesn't matter at this point.

Meanwhile Sanders supporters will be emboldened to "stick it to the media" 

Her delegate count did change after superdelegates declared for her, some of which were previously supporting Bernard.