Morphine Prince 109,983 Posted April 17, 2016 Author Share Posted April 17, 2016 Just now, Florin said: Not only because of Bill. She was senator of New York, secretary of state and had more votes than Obama in 2008. Are you saying that a women is nothing else but the wife of her man? I didn't say ONLY because of Bill. You're seriously looking for something that isn't there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Just now, Morphine Prince said: I didn't say ONLY because of Bill. You're seriously looking for something that isn't there. Well. You failed to mention anything else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,983 Posted April 17, 2016 Author Share Posted April 17, 2016 Just now, LebaneseDude said: So why do you assume it's a good thing, when many people associated Hillary with the scandal? If you ever watched "The Good Wife", you'd understand. Not necessarily a good thing but you'd expect more. Now if you're Jeb Bush everyone disliked you because of your brother haha. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,983 Posted April 17, 2016 Author Share Posted April 17, 2016 2 minutes ago, Florin said: Well. You failed to mention anything else. Well, you failed to not assume things about my post. I was responding to LebaneseDude's post about her being a household name and why that was so, largely because she was First Lady and the scandal as well, which is because of Bill, but that is not the ONLY reason she is known. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 2 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: Now if you're Jeb Bush everyone disliked you because of your brother haha. Accurate Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 3 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Maybe he'll attempt damage control and endorse her. I'm not sure though after that debate the other night. They were being so hostile it made the Clinton/Obama debates look like an afternoon tea. Im sure that he will endorse her. She clearly tried to make it easy for him by beeing really silent on him in the last month, but it was a mistake as he clearly wanted to continue the race. The problem is that at this moment a lot of Bernie supporters are actually only Hillary haters. It will be hard to make some people come around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Just now, Florin said: Im sure that he will endorse her. She clearly tried to make it easy for him by beeing really silent on him in the last month, but it was a mistake as he clearly wanted to continue the race. The problem is that at this moment a lot of Bernie supporters are actually only Hillary haters. It will be hard to make some people come around. Well in good news, many Republicans are Trump supporters and it is doubtful Trump will receive the nom, so there's that... I think... Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Just now, LebaneseDude said: Well in good news, many Republicans are Trump supporters and it is doubtful Trump will receive the nom, so there's that... I think... He still has the best chances. He only needs to win with 1% more than Cruz from here to get the nomination. In comparasion, if Bernie wins all the states from here 51% to 49%, Hillary still wins. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teo 609 Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 That's rich coming from someone who earns 20 million per year and works a total of two months when he can be late anytime he wants and not get fired and is probably pampered like an Egyptian queen during the entire process. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Hmmmm..... Lookie here what CNN is reporting @LebaneseDude @En_Sabah_Nur In 2006, when Sanders ran for the Senate, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee pumped $37,300 into his race and included him in fundraising efforts for the party's Senate candidates. The party also spent $60,000 on ads for Sanders, and contributed $100,000 to the Vermont Democratic Party -- which was behind Sanders even as he ran as an independent. Among the DSCC's top contributors that year: Goldman Sachs at $685,000, Citigroup at $326,000, Morgan Stanley at $260,000 and JPMorgan Chase & Co. at $207,000. Guess Sanders takes from big donors after all. Does this mean his votes in Congress were compromised due to these donations? Was he having to answer to others, the ones who gave his campaign money? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 1 minute ago, Whispering said: Hmmmm..... Lookie here what CNN is reporting @LebaneseDude @En_Sabah_Nur In 2006, when Sanders ran for the Senate, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee pumped $37,300 into his race and included him in fundraising efforts for the party's Senate candidates. The party also spent $60,000 on ads for Sanders, and contributed $100,000 to the Vermont Democratic Party -- which was behind Sanders even as he ran as an independent. Among the DSCC's top contributors that year: Goldman Sachs at $685,000, Citigroup at $326,000, Morgan Stanley at $260,000 and JPMorgan Chase & Co. at $207,000. Guess Sanders takes from big donors after all. Does this mean his votes in Congress were compromised dud to these donations? Was he having to answer to others, the ones who gave his campaign money? I knew that Sanders had MASSIVE campaign funding when running for the Senate seat in Vermont but I didn't realize it was run by the DSCC Let the games begin Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
En_Sabah_Nur 9,366 Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 22 minutes ago, Whispering said: Hmmmm..... Lookie here what CNN is reporting @LebaneseDude @En_Sabah_Nur In 2006, when Sanders ran for the Senate, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee pumped $37,300 into his race and included him in fundraising efforts for the party's Senate candidates. The party also spent $60,000 on ads for Sanders, and contributed $100,000 to the Vermont Democratic Party -- which was behind Sanders even as he ran as an independent. Among the DSCC's top contributors that year: Goldman Sachs at $685,000, Citigroup at $326,000, Morgan Stanley at $260,000 and JPMorgan Chase & Co. at $207,000. Guess Sanders takes from big donors after all. Does this mean his votes in Congress were compromised dud to these donations? Was he having to answer to others, the ones who gave his campaign money? @Whispering & @LebaneseDude Doesn't matter, because we already know what all of the little Bernie Bots are gonna say... Well at least "Saint" Bernie didn't take directly from Goldman Sachs, unlike that evil witch Hillary! *rolling eyes* Egypt. W Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.