Jump to content
question

LG5 Q2-Q3 Release + Super Bowl?


FATCAT

Featured Posts

crisTEAne
3 minutes ago, Creyk said:

I'm sure this will never happen

She is no superbowl material and the committee already spoke about this, she is not the kind of woman you want to let sing in front of your children. It's one thing to sing covers, and another to allow her to sing her own songs.

you must be kidding...

she sure as hell will perform at the SB. it's only a matter of time.

if you hurt taylor swift, i'll hurt you back
Link to post
Share on other sites

PunkTheFunk
6 minutes ago, Creyk said:

I'm sure this will never happen

She is no superbowl material and the committee already spoke about this, she is not the kind of woman you want to let sing in front of your children. It's one thing to sing covers, and another to allow her to sing her own songs.

They let Beyonce do the Superbowl infront of America's children looking like this :green:

1046598-singer-beyonce-performs-during-t

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bitter
16 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

This wouldn't detract from a full era, in fact, it would add to the era!

it's not about detraction and stuff.

She needs some (new) big hits so that she would be interesting for the gp again cause it's been 84 years since she had a smash hit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creyk
Just now, PunkTheFunk said:

They let Beyonce do the Superbowl infront of America's children looking like this :green:

1046598-singer-beyonce-performs-during-t

That was such an embarrassment for her

hot-milf.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bitter
23 minutes ago, MaryJaneHolland said:

i really feel that she will perform at sb 2017, because by the end of 2016 she'll have an album out, and it's predicted to be successful. if katy could perform in 2015 without anything in 2014, why wouldn't gaga (gaga will have an album out by then) 

Katy had two huge hits off PRISM.

Let's see how LG5 will do first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Born To Slay

Ideally Gaga could've done something like this:

Lead single in May

Second single in July

album in August 

third single in October

fourth single January 

super bowl performance and tour announcement in February 

tour begins March

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Harry
12 minutes ago, Creyk said:

I'm sure this will never happen

She is no superbowl material and the committee already spoke about this, she is not the kind of woman you want to let sing in front of your children. It's one thing to sing covers, and another to allow her to sing her own songs.

Well they let Madonna do it who has been far more controversial...

--

OT: Yeah, I don't see why not. I don't see why people say it isn't "her time". It's not like she doesn't have enough hits. If Bruno can do it off the back of two albums and less top ten hits than Gaga, why can't she?

My dream would be single this summer, album September, SB in February and then tour starting in April/May.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona Apple
23 minutes ago, Creyk said:

I'm sure this will never happen

She is no superbowl material and the committee already spoke about this, she is not the kind of woman you want to let sing in front of your children. It's one thing to sing covers, and another to allow her to sing her own songs.

Yes because Madonna is so children-friendly :awkney: I don't think that they ever said that

Link to post
Share on other sites

MaryJaneHolland
12 minutes ago, Bitter said:

Katy had two huge hits off PRISM.

Let's see how LG5 will do first.

100% sure there will be more than 2 huge hits on lg5 :gaycat:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona Apple
18 minutes ago, Bitter said:

Katy had two huge hits off PRISM.

Let's see how LG5 will do first.

LG5 will have 13 #1s

Link to post
Share on other sites

andy232000
41 minutes ago, Creyk said:

I read the article two years ago so I obviously can't provide you with a link :lolga:

But AFAIK when evaluating each pop girl the article said that she is simply not family friendly enough to perform there

well, Madonna did the superbowl and she is a lot less "family friendly" than Gaga. so I think she still has a shot 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Born To Slay
1 hour ago, Creyk said:

I'm sure this will never happen

She is no superbowl material and the committee already spoke about this, she is not the kind of woman you want to let sing in front of your children. It's one thing to sing covers, and another to allow her to sing her own songs.

Her songs are no more inappropriate then Katy Perry's songs

Link to post
Share on other sites

TEANUS

The argument that Gaga is too risqué or anything for families is bogus. Katy is just as risqué, and in my opinion, dirtier than Gaga. Gaga's references to sex are blatant and for a purpose, and you know what you're listening to when you listen to it, it's adult material, she's not meant for Disney. Katy makes the same references to sex, except instead of being straightforward and mature about it, she hides the references in family friendly boggle gum pop tunes. "Big, big, BIG, balloons", "Melt your Popsicle", "I wanna see your peacock". And those are some of Katy's more popular songs, Birthday, California Gurls, Peacock. Gaga's most sexual lyrics aren't found in her biggest hits, Just Dance, Poker Face (generally), Paprazzi, Bad Romance (generally), Telephone, The Edge of Glory, and Applause are all more family friendly than some of Katy's biggest hits. Except Katy's references are hidden in plain sight. Which is more risqué is a matter of opinion, but you can't say Gaga is too risqué when Katy makes similar references and played the SB last year

British social ladies with upturned pinkies, glasses clinking // xoxoTEANUS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...