Jump to content
music news

Meghan Trainor: It's Not JLo's Fault


DiscoHeaven23

Featured Posts

dannydevito

While defending ha she shaded ha at least twice

Queen of defense

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
dannydevito
23 minutes ago, TheBatman said:

Haha JLo is a great dancer, her voice isn't awful, but the songs are always sub par, including this new BS that sounds like it belongs on a Meghan album. Hated her Dear MR Husband whatever bullshit song, go back to the 50's where you belong good gaw. 

 

As far as Luke.....if I were a pop star I would stay the **** away, and not comment on Kesha or (lets play) Dr Luke and wait to see what the truth is. Going ahead and doing a Luke song right now seems like an idiot move, and yeesh aren't there more producers out there?! 

guessing you didn't listen to Hello

Link to post
Share on other sites

dannydevito
Just now, dannydevito said:

guessing you didn't listen to Hello

i meant no **** im always wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

PaperIz

Mess. Jlo had to have known who produced her song :toofunny: and Mtrain why u working with Dr Luke anyways????¿¿¿

Human generated art
Link to post
Share on other sites

StrawberryBlond

Say what you want about Jen not having input in her music, but I think this says a lot more about Meghan than it does Jen, now we know the full story. Why is Meghan thinking "I'll give a 2 year old song that I wrote with the highly controversial Dr Luke, who's being accused of rape right now, to a woman for her lead single"? Her thought process makes no sense. I'm not saying that she's supporting an accused rapist but I question why she thought letting someone use one of his songs as a lead single at this moment in time was a smart move. Now, maybe Jen did know who made it but Meghan's just defending her but at the end of the day, let's look at the root cause of the problem - Meghan thinking it was ok to still be servicing Luke's tracks to radio when he's having extremely serious accusations aimed at him right now. The sad thing is, when a woman's going through a scandal, she's not allowed to have a career but when a man's going through a scandal, he can still do his job. Meghan should think twice before subconsciously supporting this theory in future if she's going to keep on giving songs to people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DiscoHeaven23
3 hours ago, MJHolland said:

Because I don't look to Lady Gaga for my beliefs on the American justice system and I don't want to ruin a man's life and multiple careers (like JLo's) because Lady Gaga tells me he's guilty?

What's next, asking Kim Kardashian if we should consider **** Cheney are war criminal? 

I'm not saying you have to believe something because Gaga does, i'm just pointing to a reasonable example that helps make Kesha seem more credible

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MJHolland said:

The problem isn't JLo, it's you millennials that think it's OK to blacklist a producer whom you've never met over an accusation than two judges thought didn't have enough evidence.

This is a witch hunt, plain and simple.

Amen! Is he convicted? NO! So in this light Gaga is faaaar worse. She has worked numerous times and is disgustingly close friends with Terry, Kelly etc. and then even have The nerve to preach about rape. Its a damn which hunt indeed and with heavy double standards. Im sick and tired of The whole topic. What ever happened to innocent 'till proven guilty? -_- Most of ggd turning a blind eye for Gags and are ready to bear torches and go burn Luke. What if this would be Gaga in The similar situation? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MJHolland said:

Because I don't look to Lady Gaga for my beliefs on the American justice system and I don't want to ruin a man's life and multiple careers (like JLo's) because Lady Gaga tells me he's guilty?

What's next, asking Kim Kardashian if we should consider **** Cheney are war criminal? 

This too! Im sorry IF this offends others, but I repeat, INNOCENT UNTILL PROVEN GUILTY. I don't care what Gaga has to say about it, NOR should anyone else. Its utterly ridicilous...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gypsy Life
3 hours ago, StrawberryBlond said:

Say what you want about Jen not having input in her music, but I think this says a lot more about Meghan than it does Jen, now we know the full story. Why is Meghan thinking "I'll give a 2 year old song that I wrote with the highly controversial Dr Luke, who's being accused of rape right now, to a woman for her lead single"? Her thought process makes no sense. I'm not saying that she's supporting an accused rapist but I question why she thought letting someone use one of his songs as a lead single at this moment in time was a smart move. Now, maybe Jen did know who made it but Meghan's just defending her but at the end of the day, let's look at the root cause of the problem - Meghan thinking it was ok to still be servicing Luke's tracks to radio when he's having extremely serious accusations aimed at him right now. The sad thing is, when a woman's going through a scandal, she's not allowed to have a career but when a man's going through a scandal, he can still do his job. Meghan should think twice before subconsciously supporting this theory in future if she's going to keep on giving songs to people.

The actual story was that the song was written 2 years, recorded as a demo, was sent to JLo's team a few months ago then was sent to Luke to produce it. It was never a Dr Luke production before it was sent to Jennifer. That was the original story as told by Meghan herself like 2 weeks ago before any of the backlash happened. The story in the OP is probably just a PR move from Jen's side to cover up the backlash, that's why it makes no sense, and I wouldn't be surprised if that statement didn't even come from Meghan directly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GloZell Green
2 hours ago, Snow said:

This too! Im sorry IF this offends others, but I repeat, INNOCENT UNTILL PROVEN GUILTY. I don't care what Gaga has to say about it, NOR should anyone else. Its utterly ridicilous...

Are you just ignorant or have you not seen the emotional damage that this has caused to Kesha? :wtf: 

Lady Gaga | Shakira
Link to post
Share on other sites

StrawberryBlond
7 minutes ago, Gypsy Life said:

The actual story was that the song was written 2 years, recorded as a demo, was sent to JLo's team a few months ago then was sent to Luke to produce it. It was never a Dr Luke production before it was sent to Jennifer. That was the original story as told by Meghan herself like 2 weeks ago before any of the backlash happened. The story in the OP is probably just a PR move from Jen's side to cover up the backlash, that's why it makes no sense, and I wouldn't be surprised if that statement didn't even come from Meghan directly.

From what I saw in research, It appeared that Luke wrote it with Meghan 2 years ago, it was meant to be on Meghan's album but she decided against it. It was then passed on to JLo. That's what E! News reported. That's the story that makes the most sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brian Ryan
2 hours ago, Snow said:

This too! Im sorry IF this offends others, but I repeat, INNOCENT UNTILL PROVEN GUILTY. I don't care what Gaga has to say about it, NOR should anyone else. Its utterly ridicilous...

Here it is guilty until proven innocent when it comes to Dr. Luke and many guys even once they are found not guilty by DNA. Typical. Smdh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Harry
8 hours ago, MJHolland said:

The problem isn't JLo, it's you millennials that think it's OK to blacklist a producer whom you've never met over an accusation than two judges thought didn't have enough evidence.

This is a witch hunt, plain and simple.

Honestly, I see where you're coming from, even though I don't personally agree. In my eyes there's too much stacked against Kesha for her to be lying. But of course that's just an opinion.

However... I feel like there is far more to it than just the alleged abuse. For me, the fact that this man literally has Kesha in the palm of his own hand is disgusting. Contracts are renegotiated all the time in the music business, but Luke is simply holding Kesha against her will. Not allowing her to release music without his input/approval, write for other artists, even perform... The sexual abuse accusation and case aside, it's pretty f*cked that someone can be forced into such a helpless position by someone with so much power and money. All for his own gain.

In my opinion that's more than enough to warrant all the animosity towards him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SlayedForTheGod

we'll see if this happens with katys album. if it has production from him and still sells well then its not the GP speaking and they dont really care about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...