HausOfJono 4 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 The attitude of a particular user in this thread is grating and just irritating. I was just about to tell you that, but I felt bad :/ What's even MORE grating and irritating is that certain members of this forum think they are "exclusive" or have "inside info". In reality, THEY DON'T. But y'all keep buying their ****, and I'm sick and tired of seeing it. They are NOTHING special. They have *never* given receipts for anything they've said. Often, they've posted rumors that always turn out to be false. These people have never leaked anything nor have they revealed anything revolutionary that we couldn't have guessed by ourselves. You can shade me if you want for "doubting people", but these same people have never given me any reason to believe them. I can claim anything I want, too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doot 2 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 God, this. I understand the amount of money that can be lost per tracks leaking, but it's not like these songs from 2006-2007 were going to be used at all, especially considering she despises the man who produced them. Fans obsess over the rumors of some of these leaking, and she's only being a **** by cockblocking it again. These will NEVER be used only to collect dust and give illegal traders something to boast about. Like that time she bought out that auction of Lady Gaga demo CDs. Um, can you not be ignorant and refer to her as a ****. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALX 170 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I was just about to tell you that, but I felt bad :/ What's even MORE grating and irritating is that certain members of this forum think they are "exclusive" or have "inside info". In reality, THEY DON'T. But y'all keep buying their ****, and I'm sick and tired of seeing it. They are NOTHING special. They have *never* given receipts for anything they've said. Often, they've posted rumors that always turn out to be false. These people have never leaked anything nor have they revealed anything revolutionary that we couldn't have guessed by ourselves. You can shade me if you want for "doubting people", but these same people have never given me any reason to believe them. I can claim anything I want, too. Can't be bothered to read drivel I don't want to see. *adds to ignore list* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
INNA 3,685 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I was just about to tell you that, but I felt bad :/ What's even MORE grating and irritating is that certain members of this forum think they are "exclusive" or have "inside info". In reality, THEY DON'T. But y'all keep buying their ****, and I'm sick and tired of seeing it. They are NOTHING special. They have *never* given receipts for anything they've said. Often, they've posted rumors that always turn out to be false. These people have never leaked anything nor have they revealed anything revolutionary that we couldn't have guessed by ourselves. You can shade me if you want for "doubting people", but these same people have never given me any reason to believe them. I can claim anything I want, too. fragment-fragment--bul-uh...scab-uh..fragment-foot, bullet fragment foot bich! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spivey 4 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 (edited) What's even MORE grating and irritating is that certain members of this forum think they are "exclusive" or have "inside info". In reality, THEY DON'T. But y'all keep buying their ****, and I'm sick and tired of seeing it. They are NOTHING special. They have *never* given receipts for anything they've said. Often, they've posted rumors that always turn out to be false. These people have never leaked anything nor have they revealed anything revolutionary that we couldn't have guessed by ourselves. You can shade me if you want for "doubting people", but these same people have never given me any reason to believe them. I can claim anything I want, too. Except the user you were pointing out leaked Take You Out for us. Um, can you not be ignorant and refer to her as a ****. Excuse me? Don't call me ignorant. Edited April 3, 2012 by Spivey Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ K COOP 1 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 HEY EY EY EY EYYY EYYYYY, LIEK A THREAD GONE WILD, LIKE A THREAD GONE WILD. :derpga: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfJono 4 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Can't be bothered to read drivel I don't want to see. *adds to ignore list* #TrueTea #TruthTea #ThatsTheTeaBitch :lmao: :lmao: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuplissxx 2 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Don't get this thread closed guys! :nono: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
INNA 3,685 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Except the user you were pointing out leaked Take You Out for us. Excuse me? Don't call me ignorant. But you called Gaga a ****... That's a really nasty thing to say about a person who has given us so much. fragment-fragment--bul-uh...scab-uh..fragment-foot, bullet fragment foot bich! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 8 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 No, but her team most likely checks GagaDaily anyway and therefore might have seen this. And who knows if she cares or not...she obviously cared enough to stop some of her old songs from being sold at an auction. T'will be interesting to see how this all plays out. :popcorn: Do you remember what are those songs in question? I'm curious about it. I don't think I've heard the story before. It's more of a legal issue between the appropriate rights owners. Not really an artistic matter. Therefore, if Fusari owns the rights, Gaga has nothing to say about any of this. If he doesn't (which is more than likely), the other party's legal team will deal with it (most likely Interscope on behalf of Gaga in this case). Yeah, and hopefully he leaks something anyways. Imo he knows he can get in trouble and he wouldn't be that dumb person leaking something that you don't own the rights to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMTT 160 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 :duhga: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arturo 40,746 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 The drama and suspense is turning us against eachother</3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lauren Conrad 0 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 But you called Gaga a ****... That's a really nasty thing to say about a person who has given us so much. Please don't go there :roll: The word is interchangeable with b---h these days Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spivey 4 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 But you called Gaga a ****... That's a really nasty thing to say about a person who has given us so much. Get used to it, I call everyone a ****. It's my form of saying "b---h". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfJono 4 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 The drama and suspense is turning us against eachother</3 Nah, I think things just reached a boiling point regardless. At least for me. I'm pretty tired of seeing BS all over the News Discussion & Audio forums. It's been going on for months, and it's always the same users. IMO we should start handing out infractions every time someone mentions "I just got an email from Gaga's team", or "I have x, y, z, and I would leak it but my source told me not to :( he might get mad". Or my personal favorite, "IF YOU LEAK THIS I PROMISE YOU NOTHING ELSE WILL EVER LEAK AGAIN !!!!!!!1111" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts