N a t h a n 701 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 He can't release them for money He can't release them for money He can't release them for anything, she still owns them too. He cannot release them with out her permission, and you think she'll let him release old *new* music while shes on a hiatus? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALX 170 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 *He cannot release Gaga's songs. *Remember? She sued him and now he cannot release anything with her name on it. *Close the thread please? It's just making people excited, or move it to the music sub-forum. This won't be Gaga related. She countersued him regarding details of her contract. Did you read both files from the lawsuits? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spivey 4 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 (edited) *He cannot release Gaga's songs. *Remember? She sued him and now he cannot release anything with her name on it. *Close the thread please? It's just making people excited, or move it to the music sub-forum. This won't be Gaga related. Actually, Fusari sued her, she only countersued. If you want to try to act all-knowing, at least have your facts right. You don't have to be so rude. Edited April 2, 2012 by Spivey Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N a t h a n 701 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 (edited) She countersued him regarding details of her contract. Did you read both files from the lawsuits? The point im saying is he can't release her music. Counter sue = sue to me anyway, jesus. Edited April 2, 2012 by Mowgli Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
 bionic 49,805 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 He can't release them for anything, she still owns them too. He cannot release them with out her permission, and you think she'll let him release old *new* music while shes on a hiatus? yes stream bionic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALX 170 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 The point im saying is he can't release her music. He can. The whole thing was over who "made" her. As a producer he owns the rights, Interscope does NOT own the rights to those songs as far as I know Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N a t h a n 701 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 yes I really wish they were her songs, but I won't get my hopes up because he legally can't. :sad: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exoskeleton123 6 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 Everyone stop fighting. Fusari has not updated his twitter. I have a feeling Interscope will stop Fusari but I wish he'd release Glitter and Grease, and Musicland. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N a t h a n 701 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 He can. The whole thing was over who "made" her. As a producer he owns the rights, Interscope does NOT own the rights to those songs as far as I know But they are her songs, her name is on them no? He would need her permission.. it just seems like common sense. Everyone stop fighting. Fusari has not updated his twitter. I have a feeling Interscope will stop Fusari but I wish he'd release Glitter and Grease, and Musicland. I just want G&G Studio version. :sad: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuplissxx 2 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 He can. The whole thing was over who "made" her. As a producer he owns the rights, Interscope does NOT own the rights to those songs as far as I know THANK YOU! :legend: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg 6,330 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 Even though Rob is saying we'll get Glitter And Grease, I won't get my hopes up. It will be interesting to see what really happens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mantanqin 61 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 I can still remember he said he won't release these songs in a interview. :derpga: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterVlad 1,777 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 This won't be Gaga related. :toofunny: :toofunny: :toofunny: :toofunny: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N a t h a n 701 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 (edited) :toofunny: :toofunny: :toofunny: :toofunny: I mean the song, won't be a Lady Gaga song. :toofloppy: Looking back, that does look dumb. Edited April 2, 2012 by Mowgli Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
giskardsb 12,565 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 He can. The whole thing was over who "made" her. As a producer he owns the rights, Interscope does NOT own the rights to those songs as far as I know Why do you think the producer owns the rights? The songwriter is the ultimate owner of copyrights on songs, so at best Fusari has shared rights. That doesn't give him sole right to decide to distribute. And Labels pay producers to make music... when Gaga left Def Jam, she had to get Def Jam to release the material so she could take it with her to a new label. Outside of the copyrights, there are also other contracts governing the rights of labels to exclusive rights to artist output. The chances of Fusari owning the rights to distribute are virtually nil unless someone messed up a contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts