Jump to content
other

Madonna Shades Vegas Residencies


Cupid Boy

Featured Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply
AJH219
44 minutes ago, River said:

She's shading Celine? especially now? eww..

disgusting.

 

44 minutes ago, Shadow said:

Was this a dig at Britney?

It wasn't a dig at anybody nor was it shade :awkney: Y'all must have some strong muscles reaching for the stars all the time. 

'All our dreams can come true IF we have the courage to pursue them'-Walt Disney
Link to post
Share on other sites

River
10 minutes ago, AJH219 said:

 

It wasn't a dig at anybody nor was it shade :awkney: Y'all must have some strong muscles reaching for the stars all the time. 

I'd rather die than reach for the stars all the time in Vegas.

So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Shadow
5 minutes ago, AJH219 said:

 

It wasn't a dig at anybody nor was it shade :awkney: Y'all must have some strong muscles reaching for the stars all the time. 

I was just asking... The title says "Madonna shades Vegas residencies," implying that she was also shading everyone who has had one... Holy crab cakes... Chill out, man, it was never a big deal to begin with.  

Why don't you make an editorial for the New York Post or examiner.com and defend Madonna next time one of her drunk speeches comes out, so you could translate it clearly for the world as her personal SJW? You seem to have the passion for it.

Do your own research.
Link to post
Share on other sites

monketsharona

Madonna is a huge performer and a big touring force in the business so of course she still can make WW tours...

I don't even imagine Madonna doing a residency in Vegas.. Like I couldn't see Gaga doing it..

Link to post
Share on other sites

AJH219
30 minutes ago, Shadow said:

I was just asking... The title says "Madonna shades Vegas residencies," implying that she was also shading everyone who has had one... Holy crab cakes... Chill out, man, it was never a big deal to begin with.  

Why don't you make an editorial for the New York Post or examiner.com and defend Madonna next time one of her drunk speeches comes out, so you could translate it clearly for the world as her personal SJW? You seem to have the passion for it.

I would if I could :green: My glasses are rose colored enough :derpga: I'd do the same for LG. I'd be like the opposite of Angela Chang :gaycat:

'All our dreams can come true IF we have the courage to pursue them'-Walt Disney
Link to post
Share on other sites

QueenGadonna

Madonna was not shadding anyone. She just gave her opinions on doing Vegas Residencies. Madonna prefer touring on her own. Geez this forum sometime...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shadow
Just now, AJH219 said:

I would if I could :green: My glasses are rose colored enough :derpga: I'd so the same LG 

I need more coffee, but I'd hire you as my SJW if I were Madonna... or Lady Gaga... :hor: 

Do your own research.
Link to post
Share on other sites

GagaMyBlood95

Well it's her opinion, and I disagree with it tbh.. It's nothing to be ashamed of lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

LeoFameMonster
7 hours ago, Cupid Boy said:

sorry it was a mistake & no they didn't

 

No need to apologize,  I get that it was a mistake I was just wondering because I got a warning for posting in the wrong section. Just trying to figure out the "rules" on here lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

LeoFameMonster
9 hours ago, Haroon said:

Nah, using the wrong tag isn't a sin, it's more of a problem in Conversation Area with the 'Serious' tag and sometimes the 'Rumor' tag under Gaga Thoughts & Entertainment Talk than other tags in other sections :tongue: 

interesting, I got a warning for posting for my very first thread because it was in the wrong section. I am so confused by these "rules" :saladga: Thais why I asked the OP since so many people were saying it was in the wrong section I just wanted to know if he did. 

Guess my little old thread was a real rule breaker :giveup: so confusing... blah.. oh well off to go listen to dangerous woman :gaycat:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haroon
6 minutes ago, LeoFameMonster said:

interesting, I got a warning for posting for my very first thread because it was in the wrong section. I am so confused by these "rules" :saladga: Thais why I asked the OP since so many people were saying it was in the wrong section I just wanted to know if he did. 

Guess my little old thread was a real rule breaker :giveup: so confusing... blah.. oh well off to go listen to dangerous woman :gaycat:

Oh no, most people were saying he used the wrong tag, not posted it in the wrong section. Sections are like: News & Events, Gaga Thoughts, Conversation Area, etc. Thread tags are specific to a section, for example this thread's tag is 'Other' now instead of 'New Music', but it's still remained in the same section :) 

It can be a bit confusing because there are main sections and then further subsections in some cases (like how Entertainment branches out into Entertainment News, Entertainment Talk, Movies & TV, Fan Base, Video Games & Books etc). Then you have thread tags on top of that, each section & subsection has its own selection of thread tags to help users identify what kind of thread it is. It's a lot to take in but there's no rush to it really, if you want PM me and I'll post like a whole guide with examples and everything when I get home :laughga:  

Link to post
Share on other sites

LeoFameMonster
5 minutes ago, Haroon said:

Oh no, most people were saying he used the wrong tag, not posted it in the wrong section. Sections are like: News & Events, Gaga Thoughts, Conversation Area, etc. Thread tags are specific to a section, for example this thread's tag is 'Other' now instead of 'New Music', but it's still remained in the same section :) 

It can be a bit confusing because there are main sections and then further subsections in some cases (like how Entertainment branches out into Entertainment News, Entertainment Talk, Movies & TV, Fan Base, Video Games & Books etc). Then you have thread tags on top of that, each section & subsection has its own selection of thread tags to help users identify what kind of thread it is. It's a lot to take in but there's no rush to it really, if you want PM me and I'll post like a whole guide with examples and everything when I get home :laughga:  

I think I get it.....:huh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

androiduser

it's funny how both Madonna and her fans always shade the opposite of what she's doing.

I remember the days when her fans were proud because "at least she does not feature a rent-a-rapper on her songs", "at least she's not doing cheap perfumes", "at least she's not working with Timbaland like everyone else", "at least she's not on Twitter and Instagram" etc etc...

How about shading singers who can't sing, can't act and can't direct? There's an idea....

Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin
1 hour ago, androiduser said:

it's funny how both Madonna and her fans always shade the opposite of what she's doing.

I remember the days when her fans were proud because "at least she does not feature a rent-a-rapper on her songs", "at least she's not doing cheap perfumes", "at least she's not working with Timbaland like everyone else", "at least she's not on Twitter and Instagram" etc etc...

How about shading singers who can't sing, can't act and can't direct? There's an idea....

alyssa-shade.gifLol

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...