Pope Francis questions Donald Trump's Christian beliefs

[Kayla 7,595]

16 hours ago, VampireHeart said:

"A woman gets pregnant. She’s nine months. She walks across the border. She has the baby, in the United States, and we take care of the baby for 85 years. I don’t think so. And by the way, Mexico, and almost every other country anywhere in the world, doesn’t have that. We’re the only ones dumb enough, stupid enough to have it. And people — and by the way, this is not just with respect to Mexico, they’re coming from Asia to have babies here, and all of a sudden, we have to take care of the babies for the life of the baby."

What a Pro-Life thing to say. 

 

 

[REALITY 80,161]

8 hours ago, faysalaaa1 said:

He clearly did not mean all illegal immigrants are.. he meant that its a problem because there is a high rate of illegal immigrants doing crimes.. he did not talk about canadian, english or chinese because its almost none existence to have illegal immigrants from these countries. All your argument and accusation is based on assumptions!

Yes banning an entire group of people is not the answer but its still not racist. I am a Muslim so yes I know that majority of Muslims are not terrorists but because of how the middle east have been turned into a war zone for many years, there is a high terrorist rate witch is still less than 1% of all muslims but the number is big and after what happened in Paris and all the threats America has been getting, Trump decided to ban muslims until he secures the system and then let them in. Yes im against this and its immoral and wrong and just creates fear and hate but its still not racist in my opinion.

Again, im not defending Trump.. If someone punches a man one time and in court, the man was accused of punching 5 times, if you told the truth that it was only one punch are you really defending him? no your just stating facts. I personally dont like how everything today can easily be labeled racist or sexist when its not and im defending that.

 My arguments are not based on accusations and assumptions at all? Are you seriously telling me that he doesn't talk about other ethnicities—when we talk about illegal immigration—for the sole "fact" that there are no other illegal immigrants to talk about? That's complete and utter rubbish.

I still however, don't understand your logic when it comes to banning an entire people group. How can you say that that is not racist? Look back at my 'Westboro Baptist Church' example again, just because they represent a very small portion of Christians does not mean that we need to have the authority to ban all Christians. What you're trying to say is: I know that banning an entire people group is wrong, but it's not racist. I'm sorry, but that doesn't make sense to me whatsoever. However, maybe 'racist' is not the 'politically correct' term, maybe 'segregation' or 'discriminatory' may work better. But, no matter how you approach it, it's wrong.

Again, you are defending Trump. I'm not being "overly sensitive" about the subject. I'm stating what is fact; Trump says racist things that you do not perceive as being racist. In that defense, you may not be 100% supporting him, but from what I understand, you don't see any racial statements he's made. Yes, there are Muslim terrorists out there, but there are also different kinds of terrorists. Terrorists are not just Muslims. And yes, while there are illegal immigrant rapists, to say or even imply that all of them are is just wrong. 

[mmm 879]

11 minutes ago, M Monstre said:

 My arguments are not based on accusations and assumptions at all? Are you seriously telling me that he doesn't talk about other ethnicities—when we talk about illegal immigration—for the sole "fact" that there are no other illegal immigrants to talk about? That's complete and utter rubbish.

I still however, don't understand your logic when it comes to banning an entire people group. How can you say that that is not racist? Look back at my 'Westboro Baptist Church' example again, just because they represent a very small portion of Christians does not mean that we need to have the authority to ban all Christians. What you're trying to say is: I know that banning an entire people group is wrong, but it's not racist. I'm sorry, but that doesn't make sense to me whatsoever. However, maybe 'racist' is not the 'politically correct' term, maybe 'segregation' or 'discriminatory' may work better. But, no matter how you approach it, it's wrong.

Again, you are defending Trump. I'm not being "overly sensitive" about the subject. I'm stating what is fact; Trump says racist things that you do not perceive as being racist. In that defense, you may not be 100% supporting him, but from what I understand, you don't see any racial statements he's made. Yes, there are Muslim terrorists out there, but there are also different kinds of terrorists. Terrorists are not just Muslims. And yes, while there are illegal immigrant rapists, to say or even imply that all of them are is just wrong. 

The definition of racism does not match his actions.. if you want to analyze him and make assumptions thats fine but there is no proof of racism.

I wont comment on the illegal immigrants thing because I think ive made my point clear in the last comment. Yes there is many terrorist groups in the world but they are not a big threat to America specially not at the moment.. we all know that less than 1% of muslims are terrorists but its still a big number that have big power and at this moment, the West are in big threat from them so he decided to not allow muslims to enter until the system is changed to make sure no terrorist can enter. This is exactly like the Internment of Japanese Americans witch was horrible but not racist. If Christians have an actually terrorist group and is a huge threat on a certain country, I would be against banning them but I wouldnt call it racist.