Quark 7,098 Posted February 16, 2016 Author Share Posted February 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, JbGaga said: you cant say your changeing the game with the amount of tech they used. What were the initiative parts here? The face, the piano some clouds? The problem is it made less scene to people who had wind of what was happening and didnt deliver.. You cant say we are doing something innovative and leave in what they did. It was a miss calculation. One of which I dont understand how they made I do still think it was innovative. Just not as innovative as they promised it to be 3 minutes ago, Creyk said: What is amazing about a moving piano and projection on Gaga's face? Nothing we haven't seen before. like idgi. Why do people act like that is signficiant? It did not really add to the performance whatsoever. You never seen in done the way it was done and live. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Creyk said: What is amazing about a moving piano and projection on Gaga's face? Nothing we haven't seen before. like idgi. Why do people act like that is signficiant? It did not really add to the performance whatsoever. This was more innovative then what happened last night. All I kept thinking about was hassent ths virtual projecting been done? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Just now, Enigma said: I do still think it was innovative. Just not as innovative as they promised it to be You never seen in done the way it was done and live. But it was supposed to translate to TV otherwise they wouldn't have done it. So eaither they did it anyway and hyped it knowing It wouldn't translate to tv (which would be stupid) Or something went wrong and or tech was pulled from the show. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quark 7,098 Posted February 16, 2016 Author Share Posted February 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, JbGaga said: But it was supposed to translate to TV otherwise they wouldn't have done it. So eaither they did it anyway and hyped it knowing It wouldn't translate to tv (which would be stupid) Or something went wrong and or tech was pulled from the show. Look. My whole argument here is that they still delivered a very unique never before done kind of performance. If they took stuff out or not, or even if you weren't satisfied with what they delivered is a totally different argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, Enigma said: Look. My whole argument here is that they still delivered a very unique never before done kind of performance. If they took stuff out or not, or even if you weren't satisfied with what they delivered is a totally different argument. i dont think so.... This is similar accept its her face not a dress. Also opinion isent "truth" its opinion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quark 7,098 Posted February 16, 2016 Author Share Posted February 16, 2016 Just now, JbGaga said: i dont think so.... This is similar accept its her face not a dress. Also opinion isent "truth" its opinion As you saw from a video posted by Intel, the face projection is much more complex due to the fact that Gaga was moving and singing. Also, information on how new and challenging this tech was can be found here http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/02/lady-gaga-2016-grammys-david-bowie-performance-video Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Enigma said: As you saw from a video posted by Intel, the face projection is much more complex due to the fact that Gaga was moving and singing. Also, information on how new and challenging this tech was can be found here http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/02/lady-gaga-2016-grammys-david-bowie-performance-video But it dosnet matter if the tec is new. The concept is similar. Its not innovative or new to project images onto something... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neight Shayde 7,925 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 the projection has a sensor so it was moving with her. it wasn't a choreographed face movement, it was like a snapchat filter, only more real. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlondeQueenOfGGD 25,454 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 I saw it, and it's amazing, idk why fans didn't like it.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, Majora said: I saw it, and it's amazing, idk why fans didn't like it.. I dont think its what happened is whats bothering fans. Its what was promised vs what was delivered. If you were there and it looked diffrent then what we saw on tv then thats kind of a fail if the grammys is televised If there was no hype behind it and we only herd there will be a tribute and this happend we would be saying how great this was. YOu cant tell us the most amazing thing ever is happening and give us that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manul 7,377 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 The truth about the performance is that the technology part was disappointing in the eyes of little monsters, it was a marvel in the eyes of the people that worked on it (and other technical enthusiasts) and the performance itself was amazing for everyone. Except for D&S, of course. it wasn't laaaahv Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Just now, Stitches said: The truth about the performance is that the technology part was disappointing in the eyes of little monsters, it was a marvel in the eyes of the people that worked on it (and other technical enthusiasts) and the performance itself was amazing for everyone. right. to everyone unaware of the hype who had no expectations except her voice then they thought it was great. When your told the second coming of tec Jesus is coming and get no jesus then disappointment is warranted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manul 7,377 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, JbGaga said: right. to everyone unaware of the hype who had no expectations except her voice then they thought it was great. When your told the second coming of tec Jesus is coming and get no jesus then disappointment is warranted I couldn't help but think about people posting about Gags performing in/with holograms of herself, wearing the butterfly dress or something and the few blessed souls that said she was going to perform in space and hologram it to the stage. Made my night tbh. But yeah, it was disappointing on the technical aspect, at least to our ignorant (when it comes to technology) eyes. But I loved that opening thou. it wasn't laaaahv Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.