Kermit 15,807 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Do you guys REALLY think they would do all of that for a standard tribute performance? Stop melting down... They are obviously doing something more than that, if it was a basic tribute they would have gotten Gaga to do it, not drag with her one of the worlds most largest technology companies, FOR LESS THAN 8 MINUTES. The video I shared above is what people think is just a regular BTS but it looks like there's more to it than that, every now and then in the video, Gaga is flawlessly serving era-realness and that looked to original to be a tribute thing. Intel and Gaga ARE NOT DONE, stop the meltdown threads, don't look so somber ( you aren't a lana del rey music video). There is a Gaga surprise in the morning via GMA so we can expect (not overhype) something. Keep it together slutbags “For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.” ― Jean Dubuffet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twitter 14 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 My point exactly! Gaga x Intel x LG5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgalriri 1,124 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 lmfao. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gohan 16,469 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 The lana shade tryna go ask Alice, tryna catch that rabbit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 But as it pertains to Grammy show..... It was a disappointment and its own show. What does it matter if there more? We will judge that as it comes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FameHookah 4,649 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 That video is 10 times better than the mess that happened today. She looked so fresh futuristic and hot Then you have the grammys with the bad wig and facetape + weird granny moves And dont get me started on the floppy intel "tech" Atleast she still has a great voice WTF is MDNA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LePetitGAGABLover 21,234 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, FameHookah said: That video is 10 times better than the mess that happened today. She looked so fresh futuristic and hot Then you have the grammys with the bad wig and facetape + weird granny moves And dont get me started on the floppy intel "tech" Atleast she still has a great voice I had the same opinion, but after watching the performance 4 more times, I have to admit, I changed my opinion right away. This is one of Gaga's best performances of all time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen 30,431 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 OMG when you come back to ggd after a few hours and see people TRASHING the perform mance worse than any critics I've seen so far yall are really too ****ing much. She deserves better fans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FameHookah 4,649 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Just now, LePetitMonstr said: I had the same opinion, but after watching the performance 4 more times, I have to admit, I changed my opinion right away. This is one of Gaga's best performances of all time. I'll rewatch it again Fun fact : i started to sing fancy pants when fame came in, and fashion when lets dance came in lmao I love her vocals at the end WTF is MDNA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismatic 4,789 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Guys stop being so dramatic over other people's opinion. I Only Stan For Risk Takers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kermit 15,807 Posted February 16, 2016 Author Share Posted February 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Steve Nasty said: OMG when you come back to ggd after a few hours and see people TRASHING the perform mance worse than any critics I've seen so far yall are really too ****ing much. She deserves better fans not dragging it, it's just a standard tribute performance. Nothing compared to what they prepared us for, and maybe they weren't preparing us for that and that only. “For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.” ― Jean Dubuffet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VTV 12,867 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 its over trust me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LePetitGAGABLover 21,234 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 10 minutes ago, FameHookah said: I'll rewatch it again Fun fact : i started to sing fancy pants when fame came in, and fashion when lets dance came in lmao I love her vocals at the end The performance will grow on you the more you watch it imo. It wasn't bad at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,255 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 7 hours ago, FameHookah said: That video is 10 times better than the mess that happened today. She looked so fresh futuristic and hot Then you have the grammys with the bad wig and facetape + weird granny moves And dont get me started on the floppy intel "tech" Atleast she still has a great voice For your info, it was a David Bowie tribute. The 'granny moves' and wig you mentioned were all to resemble David Bowie. It's funny how people criticize Gaga when those weren't even her creations, it was DAVID's creations. From that performance, you can tell she'd put a lot of effort into studying Bowie's performing tactics and trying to execute them to bring us nothing about Gaga but everything about Bowie. That was an utmost professional and respectful attitude she was holding. I think one of the reasons why some Gaga fans are unsatisfied with the tribute performance is because she was singing rock/David's music. It's not what Gaga created and she could only sing whatever that was left to her by David. She couldn't wear whatever she wanted, she couldn't design the choreography however she wanted, she HAD a formula to follow and that was given by David. I actually felt as if Gaga never attended the show after everything today. She appeared as Bowie, she sang as Bowie, she danced as Bowie, she WAS Bowie. I was so unfamiliar with her throughout this Grammy appearance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Bromance 5,809 Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 12 hours ago, Edward Hardy said: For your info, it was a David Bowie tribute. The 'granny moves' and wig you mentioned were all to resemble David Bowie. It's funny how people criticize Gaga when those weren't even her creations, it was DAVID's creations. From that performance, you can tell she'd put a lot of effort into studying Bowie's performing tactics and trying to execute them to bring us nothing about Gaga but everything about Bowie. That was an utmost professional and respectful attitude she was holding. I think one of the reasons why some Gaga fans are unsatisfied with the tribute performance is because she was singing rock/David's music. It's not what Gaga created and she could only sing whatever that was left to her by David. She couldn't wear whatever she wanted, she couldn't design the choreography however she wanted, she HAD a formula to follow and that was given by David. I actually felt as if Gaga never attended the show after everything today. She appeared as Bowie, she sang as Bowie, she danced as Bowie, she WAS Bowie. I was so unfamiliar with her throughout this Grammy appearance. Preach it!!! This post right here sums it all up. It's good to know there are a handful of us who actually appreciated the David Bowie tribute and the fact that Gaga paid homage to her idol and completely transformed herself into David Bowie himself! I don't care what you think about unless it is about me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.