Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
politics

Trump warns Obama is coming after guns


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

SISTERV
20 minutes ago, Goosey said:

"Donald Trump on Monday warned that President Barack Obama's planned executive actions to expand background checks on gun purchases are a step toward even greater restrictions on Americans' access to firearms."

Well, they are. His executive orders have been revealed. It's a steaming pile of pointless red tape, and hopefully the next president repeals most or all of it.

Thank you!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply
SISTERV
21 minutes ago, Goosey said:

"Donald Trump on Monday warned that President Barack Obama's planned executive actions to expand background checks on gun purchases are a step toward even greater restrictions on Americans' access to firearms."

Well, they are. His executive orders have been revealed. It's a steaming pile of pointless red tape, and hopefully the next president repeals most or all of it.

Thank you!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeka

I'm just waiting for Carrie Fisher to strangle him like Jabba the Hutt.

 

The Iowa caucuses will prove how much we have to worry for our country.

Vote for Bernie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jojuun
16 minutes ago, SISTERV said:

If you think I'm bothered by your ignorant, racist, and outright misinformed post, you clearly have mistaken my character.

I don't have to be in some narrow box you think Lady Gaga created for us all to be in where we agree with everything she says. I, like Gaga, believe in diversity and freedom. Not socially condemning people or name-calling or pushing people out because they view the world differently.

And it was made clear the day before that I shared something another fan said, and prologued it with "Don't scalp me because I don't know if this is true". So no, I didn't lie. I merely got hyped just like at least 150 other people did. If you think that is in my general character to flame bait, refer to an admin who will confirm I have no warning points because I don't act delusional and I treat people with respect.

Despite that, and even though it is none of your business, I am not a fan of Trump either. But I will not stand by any candidate being called a name, being told to go to hell, or being lied on. I don't think that is fair because I wouldn't want to be treated that way so I won't treat any candidate that way.

Good luck, and get some class. Otherwise, ignore my posts. 

P.S. I am PROUD to be different.

Hold up, I AM racist? How? Cause I said you should move to a hillbilly country forum if you are defending Trump? If this was real life, this is the part where I'd be looking for the hidden cameras cause you MUST be joking.

Donald Trump is the definition of a racist. In his presidential campaign alone the man has attacked women, Jews, Mexicans, African Americans, the LGBT community, Muslims... Basically everyone that isn't a caucasian macho male like himself.

I don't agree with Gaga all the time either but I'm not going to go on a Jennifer Lopez fansite if I'm a Mariah stan, catch my drift? Don't act like you don't know what I'm talking about. This website is 95% LGBT and Donald Trump isn't exactly a fan of our community. 

And if you don't like Trump and are a believer of "freedom and diversity", why would you defend him? Trump has just released a TV commercial saying he wants to "ban all Muslims temporarily" and "build a wall around the border that Mexico will pay for." Like a f*cking South Park skit come to life. He's delusional and it's scary to think people with an OUNCE of intelligence would even consider voting for him. 

The man said "he'll call Bill Gates to figure out what to do with the internet". Tell me in what world does that make sense? Donald Trump is a moron and that's just a f*cking fact. If you don't see that, I'd suggest you to call the Born This Way Foundation hotline because he's the opposite of someone who believes in "freedom and diversity". The Man is Hitler Light. 

Get a grip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SISTERV
12 minutes ago, LePetitMonstr said:

Are you a trump supporter?:hor:

No. But I can't believe some of the ignorant, taken out of context comments he says. He is actually rather misunderstood. I don't like some the sexist, xenophobic, and anti-military comments he has made.

I like Carly Florina. She seems to have the most concise and effective plan.

 

14 minutes ago, ItsVenusBitch said:

I think most rational people know that gun control won't stop criminals who already rbeak the law from doing so... but its the disproportionate negative backlash to COMMON-SENSE gun control (such as stricter background checks to weed out those individuals who we deem inappropriate to own guns in the first place and things to restrict peopel from going around the system to get them at quick and easy gun show/gun fairs, etc.) This wont stop the issue of mass shootings or w.e, but it WILL make guns safer by reducing the amount of people who own guns (in terms of those owning them that shouldnt be allowed to) And about black market issue, there kind of already is a black market on guns :emma: 

But controlling them more for everyone, not just vetted criminals cultivates a need for a bigger black market, which makes more crime, more availability for illegal purchases, and more animosity towards the police. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lion Heart

Turn your guns in

2u43h4w.gif

 

 

 

NOW 

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Link to post
Share on other sites

Goosey
10 minutes ago, Mast said:

Obama straight up said he doesn't want to take guns away

Really? Because in "Now Is The Time: The President's Plan to Reduce Gun Violence" the third action on his list is "a new, stronger ban on assault weapons".

https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/preventing-gun-violence

2 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said:

Some people need to reread the 2nd Amendment.  

The 2nd Amendment does protect the individual right to posess guns.

The Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. Heller, concluded:

"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."

Here is the court's full decision: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

"I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump
Link to post
Share on other sites

GloZell Green
8 minutes ago, Goosey said:

Clearly you've never dealt with those laws. They're extremely strict. They're so strict the Supreme Court struck a bunch of them down.

A baby and mother got killed less than a block away from me with a gun by someone who had a criminal background. I've never tried to purchase a gun, but I don't consider it strict when things like this happen.

17 minutes ago, SISTERV said:

Yes I agree with vetting criminals and the technology is not there yet. But making it more difficult for people to buy a gun in general is ridiculous. The internet kills people more than guns do. Unhealthy foods kill people more than guns do. Alcohol kills people more than guns do. 

Background checks are possible and can help lower crime. And it's not, you agree with criminals being able to purchase a gun? Obama isn't doing away with them completely either. I also don't get the point of the final list, each are distinct. 

Lady Gaga | Shakira
Link to post
Share on other sites

LeoFameMonster

this is a typical republican crap playing on "its the beginning of the end" or "what's next"

Remember, "if gays get married what's next, people can marry animals and cars"

As if background checks on buying a gun is their "beginning to the end of the world!"

GURL BYE!

vHEUIt2.jpg

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DrewStevens
18 minutes ago, SISTERV said:

So then you admit that it wasn't about freedom of speech. 

Bloated hyperbole, then people back into a corner.

It does affect freedom of speech in practice. How can you ban the internet from certain areas without affecting freedom of speech? The people ISIS who convince people over the internet are not in an isolated area, you can't close their internet without closing other innocent people's internet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jojuun
3 minutes ago, SISTERV said:

I like Carly Florina. She seems to have the most concise and effective plan.

First of all it's Carly Fiorina not Florina.

Secondly, please visit http://carlyfiorina.org and return to this thread when you can see that CEO's like Trump and Fiorina are NOT going to bring any actual change to the US anytime soon. Fiorina was FIRED at HP. FIRED. And somehow, because of her PowerPoint presentation-like "master plan" people think she's going to be the sh*t in running the economy. Are you kidding me? She's an executive, all she's ever done in her life is building personal wealth and corporate wealth. She's DRIVEN by money. Also please research how both Trump and Fiorina have done business in the Middle East but are quick to jump on any Muslim related issue. Especially Trump.

Fiorina and her failed career can f*ck off and Trump and his delusional internet shutdown and wall can f*ck off too. How there's any Republicans left with these poor candidates is beyond me. 

It's Palin all over again. People with no relevant experience talking about issues they know jacksh*t about. Jumping on Hillary's emails and Benghazi but all they've done is run companies. Trump has gone bankrupt several times in his career and Fiorina was fired, so it's not like they were flawless while doing that. The both of them have 0 years of relevant political experience. Between Bernie and Hillary are over 100 years of relevant experience carrying titles such as senators, first lady or secretary of state. 

I hope Katie Couric interviews both of them and exposes them like she did with Palin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

andy232000

some people here really need to learn to not get their stupid noses into everyones business trying to "clarify things" because they are "misunderstood" when in the end they end up looking and feeling like a huge jackass with hostile interview like approach that bothers more than one. its like they ****ing live to counterattack people when they have the sane views.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sizzily
1 hour ago, LePetitMonstr said:

He's such a stupid idiot.:emma:

He wants to restrict freedom of speech but doesn't want to restrict the right to bear arms?  Hopefully he dies from a heart attack or something because he's making us Americans look like idiots. 

We can hope for something like this :emma:

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/president-harrison-dies-after-one-month-in-office

Inside my head I have the best time
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...