JackTheTripper 866 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 Well she didnt say anything we didnt know before. Rihanna is just entertainment pupet-her only goal is to bring bucks to Jay-Z and his record company. Since she cant write, compose, or produce, only think left is to get naked and hire other people to publish songs under her name... At least she could do i colaborate, put as Sia said before she didnt even bother to come to the studio. She should just be a model tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmenTheNight 1,084 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 So, bitch has an album cover, three singles out, an "ANTI Diary" promo going on, visuals/aesthetics and gimmicks (braille), a tour, a stage in elaboration, everything is ready, BUT the songs on the album. And she dares to use the word "Art" as a selling point of this album. Sorry, this album won't be art, it's just marketing BULLSH*T served by an UNINSPIRED singer. (And that comes from someone who bought every album from GGB to Unapologetic and went to the DWT) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 Rihanna is over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 She's so annoying omg. She should just stop releasing music and shut the **** up. A year ago she claimed she released an album for no reason (well, the only reason was to get out of her contract - very inspiring indeed) 'cause she just wants to be a songwriter for other pop artists, and now she's again releasing an album for no reason with stuff she doesn't even like, building her entire era around other artists 'cause she doesn't have **** to say for herself. And now people are actually praising her for that Get the **** outta here and let the people who pay you do things on their own time, you poser. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 23 minutes ago, AmenTheNight said: So, bitch has an album cover, three singles out, an "ANTI Diary" promo going on, visuals/aesthetics and gimmicks (braille), a tour, a stage in elaboration, everything is ready, BUT the songs on the album. And she dares to use the word "Art" as a selling point of this album. Sorry, this album won't be art, it's just marketing BULLSH*T served by an UNINSPIRED singer. (And that comes from someone who bought every album from GGB to Unapologetic and went to the DWT) If this was just marketing bullsh-t served by an uninspired singer we would've had the album already She scrapped an album because she didn't like it. Everything she's done so far for this era is the opposite of good marketing Y'all don't make no sense. She's still in control, she may not write everything from the ground up, but she's clearly in control of the final product, I don't see why she should be bashed for that, it's not like she's pretending she writes her own songs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sia Daily 2,045 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 14 minutes ago, Didymus said: She's so annoying omg. She should just stop releasing music and shut the **** up. A year ago she claimed she released an album for no reason (well, the only reason was to get out of her contract - very inspiring indeed) 'cause she just wants to be a songwriter for other pop artists, and now she's again releasing an album for no reason with stuff she doesn't even like, building her entire era around other artists 'cause she doesn't have **** to say for herself. And now people are actually praising her for that Get the **** outta here and let the people who pay you do things on their own time, you poser. The b*tch has got the right idea. And is the only one who comes out and says it like it is. Sia will always be relevant for her honesty. Look at this contrast with Gaga for example, an artist who basically claims that her albums are a part of her, an extension of the soul etc...it's all so deep and dramatic. Well with Sia (and i'm sure there's other aritsts the same) she isn't so deep and meaningful about it. Music is music tbh and Sia writes good sh*t Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 6 minutes ago, Medoner Cortez said: The b*tch has got the right idea. And is the only one who comes out and says it like it is. Sia will always be relevant for her honesty. Look at this contrast with Gaga for example, an artist who basically claims that her albums are a part of her, an extension of the soul etc...it's all so deep and dramatic. Well with Sia (and i'm sure there's other aritsts the same) she isn't so deep and meaningful about it. Music is music tbh and Sia writes good sh*t How is that even a response to what I'm saying? If Sia doesn't even care if the music she releases under her own name is something she likes or not, why should we use her as the antithesis of a lazy, uninspired and marketing-driven Rihanna? Sia's current era is the real uninspired marketing-driven mess, just like her last one. Sia's a great songwriter but anyone who uses other people's fame to make a name for themselves while at the same time pretending they don't really wanna be a star is just a con artist in my book. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmenTheNight 1,084 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 5 minutes ago, Didymus said: If this was just marketing bullsh-t served by an uninspired singer we would've had the album already Everything she's done so far is the opposite of good marketing Y'all don't make no sense. Where did I say that it was GOOD marketing ? I'm saying that they're just trying to bring some sense in all the bullsh*t going on with the creating process of the album. But with such a terrible, undecisive and lazy ass singer as Rihanna, it's hard to get something out of it all. Everyone involved in the process of this album is an unprofessional mess, Rihanna first. What makes me laugh the most is that they rely on the word "art" to bring attention to the project. It's not art, it's some sad tryhard gimmick used as an excuse. If anything, they're making her look like a fool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackTheTripper 866 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 Who is using who? Rihanna is hot chick-thats all, everything she has, including milllions and millions of bucks, mansion, worlwide acclaim, is because of other songwriters, producers and composers, she ows everthing to those poeple including SIa. Rihanna takes credit for everything beacuse she has alot of PR and publicist around her. So why shpuldnt Sia get credit- after all-ITS HER ****ING SONG. and rRhanna is and will be-just a projectt, a manneqin.. with expensive clothes, build up reputation of being bad and edgy. Yeah yeah i get it, she is really cool chick, i should buy "her" album. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 Just now, AmenTheNight said: Where did I say that it was GOOD marketing ? I'm saying that they're just trying to bring some sense in all the bullsh*t going on with the creating process of the album. But with such a terrible, undecisive and lazy ass singer as Rihanna, it's hard to get something out of it all. Everyone involved in the process of this album is an unprofessional mess, Rihanna first. What makes me laugh the most is that they rely on the word "art" to bring attention to the project. It's not art, it's some sad tryhard gimmick used as an excuse. If anything, they're making her look like a fool. Who the hell is linking her album to art? I never saw that, where is this happening? Not replying to the rest 'cause you obviously just hate her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sia Daily 2,045 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 11 minutes ago, Didymus said: How is that even a response to what I'm saying? If Sia doesn't even care if the music she releases under her own name is something she likes or not, why should we use her as the antithesis of a lazy, uninspired and marketing-driven Rihanna? Sia's current era is the real uninspired marketing-driven mess, just like her last one. Sia's a great songwriter but anyone who uses other people's fame to make a name for themselves while at the same time pretending they don't really wanna be a star is just a con artist in my book. That's what I said! Sia has basically said what you said, not like Rihanna who claims that it's authentic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 5 minutes ago, Medoner Cortez said: That's what I said! Sia has basically said what you said, not like Rihanna who claims that it's authentic. Rihanna never claimed to write her songs. What is this inauthenticity that people love to bring up? Rihanna doesn't hide her songwriters, she doesn't pretend to be some musical or artistic genius. It's funny how the people who love to bring her down first have to slap unexisting stuff around her as if she's somehow pretending to be better than everyone else. You just can't stand her and that's fine, but don't bring this ridiculous nonsense to back up your opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackTheTripper 866 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 The people who respond, dint respond against rihanna personally, (personally i dont hate, i simply dont care about her). The respond was aimed at Sia having right to credit her work for other people. Respect to all of you, and your opinions <3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Gangsta 6,693 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 11 hours ago, jthorn said: I think it's funny that this is making people mad. If they wrote a song together and Sia said "Oh Yes, Rihanna came around last night and we created 4 songs with just us and the piano", people would be happy. Sia isn't saying anything negative, she is just being honest. I think that, honestly, people are just a bit embarrassed to be hearing how 'artist' make albums. Hahaha, yes!!! She wrote the songs, they belong to her!! Technically, they are her projects. She sold them. And it's not confirmed any of these will be on the project so how does that make it her project? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackTheTripper 866 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 Its not, its Def Jams project, under Rihannas name Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.