ShockPop 7,747 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Everyone I've spoken to loves this season and people who've never rated Gaga are actually admitting to liking her in AHS. The internet world is full of over-critical idiots that don't know what on earth they're talking about. "ooooh, my article is published online, it makes it true and gives it merit" drop dead and get a grip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djBuffoon 12,123 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Kinda awkward for them to pull this after her performance in "Flicker" got nearly unanimous acclaim, and she was nominated by by the People's Choice and the Int'l Press Academy. So, basically, her performance is appreciated by audiences and critics.... Try again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
giskardsb 12,565 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 that writer has been writing the same article basically for every week, dragging Gaga and trying to blame her for ratings losses, etc. It's clearly just designed for click bait and has no actual journalism or merit, simply dragging Gaga for clicks. I agree it's probably the same no life loser behind Angela Chang and Buchanan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantasmas 10,598 Posted December 5, 2015 Share Posted December 5, 2015 she slays on the show idk what yall are talking about Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CannaeDrive 3,412 Posted December 5, 2015 Share Posted December 5, 2015 So, can we just ignore that crappy site and refrain to post anything from there on GGD? Thank you very much. "Fame Is A Boomerang" - Maria Callas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VenusBlackStar 1,301 Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 Did they really have to add that little stinger about "commercially disappointing" ARTPOP? As a writer with journalism experience that little thing seems added in bad taste and mostly just serves to show that the writer already has a biased view toward Gaga before the writing of this article. The little bit at the end about the writer being sure that 2016 will be good for Gaga and her fans doesn't really make up for it and feels like a lazy face-saving ending for a badly-written article. And I think it's funny that the new trend of accusations toward Gaga is her/her team buying awards and positive press and such because the haters are running out of things to look for to use to bash her lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.