CatelynnMarie 4,406 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 This is literally EVERYTHING. Sinatra is one of my favorite artists and the fact Gaga was able to close this amazing tribute show with a true classic that was totally meant for her to cover, like, UGH this is just so exciting and makes me so happy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henaub 191 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 14 hours ago, RexxyC said: gurl I understand, but all she's done for a year is cover other artists material, tribute or not; it's just enough already. No, it aint. Take a seat Pole dancer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexxyC 203 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Just now, ASYLUM said: No, it aint. Take a seat how dare I have an opinion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henaub 191 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Just now, RexxyC said: how dare I have an opinion a stupid one Pole dancer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexxyC 203 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Just now, ASYLUM said: a stupid one take a seat indeed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kattys 4,319 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Now sing "Radio Gaga" please Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Moments like these remind me why I am such a big fan of her. She sounds impeccable. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 5 hours ago, RexxyC said: how dare I have an opinion You're on a forum, where opinions are meant to be discussed and criticized in presumably civilized exchanges. She has no material released at the moment. Are you really insinuating that it's better for her to not sing anything at all in the meantime? Do you honestly believe that these performances are having a negative effect? In both cases, the answer is a clear and resounding no. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexxyC 203 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 2 hours ago, LebaneseDude said: You're on a forum, where opinions are meant to be discussed and criticized in presumably civilized exchanges. She has no material released at the moment. Are you really insinuating that it's better for her to not sing anything at all in the meantime? Do you honestly believe that these performances are having a negative effect? In both cases, the answer is a clear and resounding no. how are you people putting words in my mouth like this, I wasn't insinuating ****, I personally think it's lame and I do not like it; I don't care that she does it. I'm in the middle. You people Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UmbriaWitch 325 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 On Thursday, December 03, 2015, RexxyC said: over the covers Odd that you felt the need to comment that in a thread that was obviously about a cover if you're over it She's in between eras, you'd have a point if LG5 was released and she was still singing covers everywhere Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexxyC 203 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 3 hours ago, UmbriaWitch said: Odd that you felt the need to comment that in a thread that was obviously about a cover if you're over it She's in between eras, you'd have a point if LG5 was released and she was still singing covers everywhere because there's no such thing as too much, right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 6 hours ago, RexxyC said: how are you people putting words in my mouth like this, I wasn't insinuating ****, I personally think it's lame and I do not like it; I don't care that she does it. I'm in the middle. You people When someone says "it's enough", it implies they want what they're complaining about to stop. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexxyC 203 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 13 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: When someone says "it's enough", it implies they want what they're complaining about to stop. im gonna be done with this thread now, people are trying to put words in my mouth; my opinion is that I don't care for these covers, that's it. no amount of bulls--t is going to change that. She can do them, that's perfectly fine; however i'm over it, i've had enough of it, etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 54 minutes ago, RexxyC said: im gonna be done with this thread now, people are trying to put words in my mouth; my opinion is that I don't care for these covers, that's it. no amount of bulls--t is going to change that. She can do them, that's perfectly fine; however i'm over it, i've had enough of it, etc. No need to get touchy. There's a subtle implicative difference between "It's enough" and "I've had enough". The former is objectively stating that enough of the subject has been done, thus implying that you believe that Lady Gaga should stop because enough has been done, while the latter is subjectively stating that you've had enough of the subject, which only implies that you don't care for the subject anymore... which is what you're trying to say apparently. Not trying to give you an English lesson, but that's the root of the misunderstanding. :O) Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexxyC 203 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 22 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: No need to get touchy. There's a subtle implicative difference between "It's enough" and "I've had enough". The former is objectively stating that enough of the subject has been done, thus implying that you believe that Lady Gaga should stop because enough has been done, while the latter is subjectively stating that you've had enough of the subject, which only implies that you don't care for the subject anymore... which is what you're trying to say apparently. Not trying to give you an English lesson, but that's the root of the misunderstanding. :O) I'm not touchy, this thread is annoying me, and I don't need armchair English teachers trying to give me lessons on a lady gaga forum. kbye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.