Jump to content
question

Would 'Monster' be a good lead single?


Rifek

'Monster' as lead single  

54 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you be here for 'Monster' as the -leader- of any record?

    • Yes
      33
    • No
      20


Featured Posts

It just hit me today while listening to 'Monster'. It's such a MASTERPIECE!!!

Do you think it could do well if Gaga has released it as lead single? Not talking about TFM, but any record, f.ex. LG5..

Don't compare it with BR or another 'leaders'.  I'm asking about Gaga's choice without our hearing other songs from the record 'Monster' would belong to. 

 

❗️ IG: thebumblebee__ ❗️
Link to post
Share on other sites

I always loved that song. But Gosh! Tonight it hit me so hard! 

This song can't be described with any words...

❗️ IG: thebumblebee__ ❗️
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lucifer

Anything from that album could be gold. But I think they made the right choice with Bad Romance. Not here for a re-release/Radar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobster

I just need another one of her catchy repetitive syllables as a lead single... you know, Poker Face, Monster, MTN, MANiCURE, among many other :wub:

But I'm only a man and I do what I can.
Link to post
Share on other sites

TF: it would have flopped

TFM: it would have smashed

BTW: it would have smashed

ARTPOP: it would have done a bit worse than applause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude
Just now, Klou said:

The song is so dated. It would be a good lead single if she wanted to kill her career.

I never understood what "dated" is supposed to mean. I've only heard that term here and on ATRL. 

It's a good song irrespective of what is currently generic on radio.

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

I never understood what "dated" is supposed to mean. I've only heard that term here and on ATRL. 

It's a good song irrespective of what is currently generic on radio.

It means it sounds old. The sound is definitely 2009.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LebaneseDude
6 minutes ago, Klou said:

It means it sounds old. The sound is definitely 2009.

But what does that have to do with its quality?
 

I suppose there's an argument to be made that deviating from global trends can dictate what people perceive to be bad so eh...
 

Edited just now by LebaneseDude.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...