Prismatic 4,789 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Don't tell me this is the start for Katy to rebel against the church? Katy anti church pop is coming soon. #yes I Only Stan For Risk Takers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooke Candy 3,970 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 didn't read the article but whatever it is- yass,drag ha omg i love that gif buy 'Paper or Plastic' by Brooke candy on iTunes NOW!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Katy wants to buy the house but they didn't want to give it to her and sold it to somebody else without Katy's consent, so Katy SUED themKaty is sueing a group of nuns because they won't sell her a house? Why doesn't she just find another house? Does she have to have THIS house? I guess she is used to getting whatever she wants, because she has money and she is a "star". Guess what Katy, we don't always get what we want! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveandMagic 1,731 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Tricky tricky. Just repeat to yourself, "It's just a show. I should really just relax." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcina Dimitrescu 1,156 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Katy is sueing a group of nuns because they won't sell her a house? Why doesn't she just find another house? Does she have to have THIS house? I guess she is used to getting whatever she wants, because she has money and she is a "star". Guess what Katy, we don't always get what we want! No. Katy offerted money for the House and the Archdiocese accepted. The nuns freaked out because they wont see a penny out of it so they sold it to some girl who wants to make a hotel. Who actually owns the building is confusing tho, but i think its the Archdiocese. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 No. Katy offerted money for the House and the Archdiocese accepted. The nuns freaked out because they wont see a penny out of it so they sold it to some girl who wants to make a hotel. Who actually owns the building is confusing tho, but i think its the Archdiocese.She should just find another house. There are reasons that we don't get what we want sometimes. Maybe this wouldn't be a good investment in the long run or something else is right for her. It's a house, there are other ones you can buy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcina Dimitrescu 1,156 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 She should just find another house. There are reasons that we don't get what we want sometimes. Maybe this wouldn't be a good investment in the long run or something else is right for her. It's a house, there are other ones you can buy. There are other hotels in LA, what does the other person want to make a new one or make that specific place an hotel? That kind of thinking is fallacious. Try again when you can make an actual argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 There are other hotels in LA, what does the other person want to make a new one or make that specific place an hotel? That kind of thinking is fallacious. Try again when you can make an actual argument.I don't think the other person is sueing or being sued, so what do they have to do with anything. This isn't an argument, just an observation. I think it is silly to act like this is the only house in the world. My thoughts on the matter is that she should find another house, because sometimes things just don't happen like you want them to. Sometimes you don't get what you want and there is usually reasons for that, something that will reveal itself later. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teri Hatcher 2,053 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 By the time you reach the end of this sentence, it'll be too late to realize I just wasted your time with a pointless sig. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcina Dimitrescu 1,156 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 I don't think the other person is sueing or being sued, so what do they have to do with anything. This isn't an argument, just an observation. I think it is silly to act like this is the only house in the world. My thoughts on the matter is that she should find another house, because sometimes things just don't happen like you want them to. Sometimes you don't get what you want and there is usually reasons for that, something that will reveal itself later. the "other person" is the one being sued. "The archdiocese claims in a statement, “The sisters have been taken advantage of by the Hollister transaction.” That’s the line Perry has taken as well, suing the entrepreneur for interfering with her contractual rights to the sale." And once again, your "observation" works just as perfectly for the woman being sued. Next time at least read the opening post before opening that mouth of yours. God Bless Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 the "other person" is the one being sued."The archdiocese claims in a statement, “The sisters have been taken advantage of by the Hollister transaction.” That’s the line Perry has taken as well, suing the entrepreneur for interfering with her contractual rights to the sale."And once again, your "observation" works just as perfectly for the woman being sued. Next time at least read the opening post before opening that mouth of yours. I read it and this is my opinion. A house shouldn't be something you sue people over, not unless that house was in your family or something like that. If the owners of the house don't want to sell it to you, move on. There are other houses to buy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo 7,686 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 What a mess. I thought I read at some point that Katy wanted to destroy the house and rebuild, I guess not. Shouldn't buyers remain anonymous to avoid stuff like this? Don't visit my profile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PdogtheDaibutsu 717 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 No. Katy offerted money for the House and the Archdiocese accepted. The nuns freaked out because they wont see a penny out of it so they sold it to some girl who wants to make a hotel. Who actually owns the building is confusing tho, but i think its the Archdiocese.although, the nuns have the deed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcina Dimitrescu 1,156 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 I read it and this is my opinion. A house shouldn't be something you sue people over, not unless that house was in your family or something like that. If the owners of the house don't want to sell it to you, move on. There are other houses to buy. the actual owners are the archdiocese, aka the people who Katy contacted, not the nuns. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 the actual owners are the archdiocese, aka the people who Katy contacted, not the nuns. Owners of the house...whoever they are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.