HighwayGuy 1,498 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 It makes SO much sense to put more limits on their free service, it still should be there but it shouldn't be able to be used to listen to albums that have just been released Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 15,930 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 i use spotify free and the ads don't annoy me, but if their premium content is good i may get it, plus if they do this bye bye Tidal for good tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaanBTW 5,244 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 I am supporting that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmm 979 Posted August 9, 2015 Share Posted August 9, 2015 I knew this would happen. As much as I love it, bye bye Spotify. Hello, Apple Music! So you're either moving from a free service to a paid service, or from a paid service (in which case the changes won't affect you) to another paid service? - OT: Spotify premium user here, don't like how all the streaming field is becoming so fragmented now Blaming the corporate money *****s at Apple and the celeb money *****s at Tidal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorothy Gale 7,575 Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 I don't use spotify so I don't care. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riot Poof 2,236 Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 I have that student discount for Spotify Premium. I'm not a woman. I'm not a man. I am something that you'll never understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robinladen 1,527 Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 Why are they following Tidals footsteps? Have they not learned that people will rebel against this? Apple Musics competition if they aren't allowed to play any artists of the three biggest labels, they would lose pretty much every client they have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robinladen 1,527 Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 normally more competition is good for clients but in this case it's getting worse for us but a bit better for the artists I guess Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloZell Green 11,723 Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 if they aren't allowed to play any artists of the three biggest labels, they would lose pretty much every client they have. Well that does make sense but this is going to backfire, especially when they put more limits. What a moment to do this... (They should release Act II and DWUW video on Spitify and I'm more than happy with this change ). Anyways I don't use Spotify for music, I use YouTube Lady Gaga | Shakira Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellatrix 34,810 Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 I don't think it would make more people pay for it. The ones who don't pay for it now (including me) won't start paying now. Lose control. Let go and fall. Do you get the satisfaction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveandMagic 1,731 Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 It doesn't change things for me. I am never paying for a streaming service. It's not that I think I am entitled to free music (I don't) I just have other things I would rather spend my money on. Just repeat to yourself, "It's just a show. I should really just relax." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.