Haroon 49,685 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 @Henry I added @Redstreak's source to yours and added the article to the OP because your threads were basically discussing the same thing so I tried to make it as streamlined together as possible so all the discussion could be kept in one place - I hope that's alright! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyerased 2,886 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Inb4 another long tumblr post next week explaining why 1989 still won't be up for Apple Music. Kidding aside, Slay Tay! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creyk 17,819 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Inb4 another long tumblr post next week explaining why 1989 still won't be up for Apple Music. Kidding aside, Slay Tay! OMG, Jon is your avatar Flawless taste Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nein 508 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Taylord ha power Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsterdreams 1,529 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Now can she stahp with this Haters gonna need more than a flashlight for my shade Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyerased 2,886 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 OMG, Jon is your avatar Flawless taste yass! A single man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal 768 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 AMAZING. Taylor's power is undeniable. Apple's move sends a positive message also. It's a win-win for Taylor, indie artists, and Apple. It makes all of the naysayers in the other thread look pressed! I mean if Apple agreed it was the right decision, well... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaMyBlood95 9,915 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Omg I never, like NEVER expected this to happen. I guess Apple really wants Taylor on board with their streaming service... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat 6,162 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Omg I never, like NEVER expected this to happen. I guess Apple really wants Taylor on board with their streaming service...Who doesn't. She's everywhere in the news nowadays. The IT-girl of 2015. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaMyBlood95 9,915 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Who doesn't. She's everywhere in the news nowadays. The IT-girl of 2015.True. I guess now she can't say no to them because she had one demand only and they accepted it just because of her tbh, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creyk 17,819 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 The mother Teresa of the music industry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewStevens 5,249 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 I think the only reason why they changed it it's because she exposed them and not because she has any power to change it. Apple obviously doesn't want to look like the bad guys in this situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pure Adrenaline 1,518 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Queen of changing streaming services with her open letters It's much more fun to have hizophrenia... u never get lonely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewYorkCity 10,536 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 Now she will have to join. The only point to not to join apple music was that they weren't paying. Now that they are... she will be into it, right?If not... just proves it was all about the money money money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,092 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 "Apple had planned to offer users a three-month free trial of its upcoming streaming Apple Music service that launches June 30th. However, it had negotiated deals with the major labels to not pay rights holders royalties during these trials and instead pay a tiny bit more in royalty rates afterwards. Now in the wake of intense negative PR stemming from Swift’s blog post that bashed the policy, including my post earlier today where I wrote “Apple is acting greedy” and should pay up, the tech giant has recanted. The move should help it improve the public perception of Apple Music and potentially pull in some artists that were boycotting the old payout structure. Those include artists managed by Beggars Group, which put out its own letter to Apple last week denouncing the royalty-free trial." http://techcrunch.com/2015/06/21/apple-music-free-trial/#.dvxc2b:uKk1 I guess Taylor can finally afford a meal. So happy for her bank account. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.