Paper Planes 340 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 But... But... Bu.. I thought was doing this all for herself and she was "GREEDY!!!!1!!!111!!!!!". Turns out that maybe - just maybe - Taylor earns enough money to not be bothered by this personally but she actually cares for smaller artists. Who would've thought? CLOCKEDT Yas, everyone stick along with the (Tay)lord. delete it fat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FGGrayson 9,670 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Oh please!! 𝗟𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗚𝗮𝗴𝗮 • 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘆 𝗠𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗲 • 𝗦𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗲-𝗘𝗹𝗹𝗶𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗼𝗿 • 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗝𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀𝗼𝗻 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny 12,736 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Also, this was already known before Taylor. Why does everyone say she was the first one to "expose them" I like Taylor, she has bops, but really... I like dancin', and ponies.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vernier 3,786 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Eh, doesn't matter. Streaming is the future of music.Doesn't mean she(and others) can't at least get better deals out of it. Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Empty 25,190 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 To those saying "streaming is the future of music"Taylor is not opposing streaming. Taylor is opposed to Apple using three months of free streaming as a marketing tool, and not even paying the artists who provide the music for those three months. It can make a big difference for artists that have not yet established themselves. These tweets prove that. Happiness will never last, darkness comes to kick your ass... ᵃˢˢ 🕺 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 8,412 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Ok, so don't put your music on Apple music. Ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jjang 2,262 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Less than 2 dollars for 2 million plays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrinceGaga 7,585 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 I like what Taylor wrote tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropico 4,145 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 when will bayons Never My fav needs to step up and stop being GREEDY!!!! ♢ Social Justice Enthusiast ♢ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runway 27,876 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Those artists can remain UNKNOWN and bothered. Apple is giving them a huge tool to share their music to the world thats their payment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropico 4,145 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 To those saying "streaming is the future of music" Taylor is not opposing streaming. Taylor is opposed to Apple using three weeks of free streaming as a marketing tool, and not even paying the artists who provide the music for those three months. It can make a big difference for artists that have not yet established themselves. These tweets prove that. It's 3 months. Which is 10x worse ♢ Social Justice Enthusiast ♢ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CannaeDrive 3,412 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Those artists can remain UNKNOWN and bothered. Apple is giving them a huge tool to share their music to the world thats their paymentKind of MTE, think in terms of opportunity costs. "Fame Is A Boomerang" - Maria Callas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Empty 25,190 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 It's 3 months. Which is 10x worse Woops I wrote "weeks" at first and "months" after that . I can't post anything without having to edit it 10 times afterwards because of these things Happiness will never last, darkness comes to kick your ass... ᵃˢˢ 🕺 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kulture Kiari 3,433 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 This is completely unfair. I am truly trying to understand her, but why isn't the same spotlight put into the acting industry? Netflix, Hulu, Amazon do the same thing, and you don't see actors complaining. And no, I am not talking about George Clooney and all them. I am talking about struggling actors. As a former actor, some artists (musicians/actors/others) get paid upfront a small percentage. And then they start to see money. But it all goes back to "Why are you trying to be an artist then? To entertain or be a millionaire? Because if you want to be a millionaire, bish better go to college instead of relying on a big cut to happen." Streaming is the future, and there is no way to stop it. Either be happy with the money youre earning from the streaming sites, or be happy with nothing, because Im sure if people cant find your catalog on the streaming service theyre paying, then they will go ahead and download it illegally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterMum 2,532 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Eh, doesn't matter. Streaming is the future of music.Streaming might be the future, that's true but it doesn't mean that the writers that are behind the projects should be bullied by a big coorporation to basically give their livelihood up for free. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.