Golden Gangsta 49 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 People need to get over themselves. Beyonce did nothing wrong. How sensitive can some gorls be?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlienFugitive 1 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 not when it's flopping Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Monk 0 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 sorry but an artist is free to express themselves in any way they want, use of the audio was beyonces choice and she was probably prepared for controversy but that in no way means she should rectify her "faux par" by donating, she can do what she wants. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamlet 67 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 They can keep dreaming on that 25% Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glow 0 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 not when it's flopping Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joaco95 1,631 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 not when it's flopping the song, but not the album Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausofmike 127 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Oh wow 4,000 people out of 300+ million Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kermit the frog 1,860 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Ridiculous and outrageous. Disgusting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo 7,398 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 "i probably won't make no money off this, oh well" Beyonce from Haunted so that's what she meant! Don't visit my profile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truth 90 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Is this serious? Omg! That's crazy! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty 87 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 She told them why it's included, I think they're making a bigger deal then what they should. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyMoonShine 0 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Seems a bit weird and over the top, people get offended to easily these days I think. Artists are gonna use news stories in their artwork sometimes and as long as they do it respectfully I don't see what there is to get upset about. It's not like she was gonna make more off the song because of the clip,although she might now because of the controversy. The whole demanding of money from her is sort of bad taste tbh but maybe they should just pay it anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brainiac 10,601 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 the fact that they're demanding her to pay it makes me support her even more in not paying it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket No9 0 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 She told them why it's included, I think they're making a bigger deal then what they should. Let's be honest, the "tribute" reason she gave was absolutely ridiculous when you consider the tragic soundtrack she used and what XO is about. But yeah it's being made a big deal out of than necessary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeka 12,372 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 I kind of think she should pay anyway. Most other artists pay for their samples. The entire situation could've been avoided if they did that. And probably for less money as well. It isn't tasteless, moneygrubbing, or stupid, it is just how things are done in the music business. Also, just judging by the lyrics, the song isn't that great, and kind of makes a fool of a tragic event, which kind of makes me want her to pay them MORE. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.