venusian 4,686 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Abstinence is 100% effective. And each state has some form of safe haven law. girl s-x is life and aint nobody gone quit having s-x bc the world is overpopulated WELCOME TO THE TRAGIC KINGDOM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HANZ 4,380 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 If I had a child growing inside of me then I feel like it would be my right to either kill it or keep it, not anybody else's. It would be a part of me, not you.I wish more people would adopt instead of contributing to the overpopulation problem.I also agree with this tho My Favs = Lady Gaga, Janet Jackson, Ricky Martin, AKB48 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
venusian 4,686 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 whoever made this thread congrats on the hit thread you'll have in the morning WELCOME TO THE TRAGIC KINGDOM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorothy Gale 7,575 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 girl s-x is life and aint nobody gone quit having s-x bc the world is overpopulated Condoms and birth control pills, when used together decrease the chances to almost zero. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstreak 6,653 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Sorry, the right to autonomy over one's body should not be impeded. Why does the mother have any kind of mandatory obligation to a still forming glob of cells? :gayb2: Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
venusian 4,686 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Condoms and birth control pills, when used together decrease the chances to almost zero. **almost** key word and not everybody can afford that stuff WELCOME TO THE TRAGIC KINGDOM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorothy Gale 7,575 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Sorry, the right to autonomy over one's body should not be impeded. Why does the mother have any kind of mandatory obligation to a still forming glob of cells? :gayb2:Because it's a developing child. That's very dehumanizing language. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveandMagic 1,731 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 "Already, women must wait 24 hours after receiving state-directed counseling that includes information designed to discourage an abortion before getting the procedure done."This is what really pisses me off. Here in my state, the anti-Choice group showed tons of commercials pretending they were all for the health of the woman and that clinics weren't properly funded so bad procedures resulted, etc etc. But then ran around stuffing pamplets and **** in peoples mail boxes basically saying that women need "time" to "rethink" a "hasty" "emotional" decision (I think it was a 3 day wait that they wanted). They basically implied that women don't think about these things, when a lot of abortions happen as the result of a collective decision between couples. The fact that they tell the woman that she must WAIT, the fact that they try to DISSUADE her from a decision she has already THOUGHT about, is INSULTING. Women have ****ing brains too! And we USE THEM! I've known people that have had such a procedure done, it wasn't a decision they took lightly.And if clinics aren't properly funded, then whose fault is that? People acting like Planned Parenthood is in the "abortion business" and that's all they do are GROSSLY ill informed. Not to mention there are so few, FEW clinics and doctors that will do these procedures because of all the damn death threats they get!And funny how all these anti-Choice groups are headed by men. But they sure make sure to pimp their wives and daughters out there with picket signs. I'm so damn disgusted. Just repeat to yourself, "It's just a show. I should really just relax." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Draco 2,531 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Because it's a developing child. That's very dehumanizing language. This is one subject I will not be able to come to an agreement with you on. I still respect you though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
venusian 4,686 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Because it's a developing child. That's very dehumanizing language. why do you even care its not your body its not your right so you don't have the right to tell them what to do... what if someone told you to workput and stop eating bc your fat and then they made a law making you do all the things... WELCOME TO THE TRAGIC KINGDOM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion Heart 15,041 Posted April 8, 2015 Author Share Posted April 8, 2015 girl s-x is life and aint nobody gone quit having s-x bc the world is overpopulated ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstreak 6,653 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Because it's a developing child. That's very dehumanizing language. But it's true. Batter first placed in the oven is not already a cake. An acorn placed in the ground is not already a tree. Conception is not a valid reason to immediately extend full rights of life and to force women to carry an unwanted pregnancy. Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chic 20,830 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Imagine someone goes into the rainforest and catches hookworm and the parasite grows in their body, and they want to kill the parasite before it comes out. Sure the person should have not gone in the rainforest but if they wanna kill the unwanted organism inside them they should have the right Not to make the disturbing correlation, but, food for thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorothy Gale 7,575 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 But it's true. Batter first placed in the oven is not already a cake. An acorn placed in the ground is not already a tree. Conception is not a valid reason to immediately extend full rights of life and to force women to carry an unwanted pregnancy.You're cake batter a--logy is a lot more fitting for sperm. At the moment of conception a new life is formed. That's peek a boo logic, just because a baby is in the womb doesn't mean it's not human. What about a birth ca--l makes a human? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstreak 6,653 Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 You're cake batter a--logy is a lot more fitting for sperm. At the moment of conception a new life is formed. That's peek a boo logic, just because a baby is in the womb doesn't mean it's not human. What about a birth ca--l makes a human? Nothing, fully realized development is what makes a human. Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.