Rino 5,120 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 you can't hide lack of talent, charisma, stage presense and overall basicness even by the most expensive production in the world it makes things even worse when you realize all this money is wasted on someone as mediocre and unimpressive as Katy Perry 月にかわって、おしおきよ！🌙 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladey Gagz 2,512 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 I agree tbhOf course vocal wise Gaga is better but we didn't hear her that much (excluding the acoustics)But the tour itself, Prismatic Tour is better imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorothy Gale 7,575 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 Prismatic was obviously more expensive, but I think that had to do with her having an overall more successful era. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkchylde 14,857 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
liz89 373 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 I haven't seen the Prismatic Tour and my ArtRAVE was amazing It don't make sense to compare artists and their tours or whatever. It's all a matter of taste. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teejoo 0 Posted March 14, 2015 Author Share Posted March 14, 2015 I just don't get why you can't like both, I liked artRave better vocalwise and Prismatic better showwise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 performerGaga>>>>>>>>>Katy Stage and productionsorry but the prismatic completely destroys the artraveYea, I have to agree. The artRave just completely lacked in stage production. I loved the stage and the setlist, but it was practically Gaga doing the same thing for every song. There wasn't much planning whereas the Prismatic Tour did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitch 204 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 No, just....no. LADY GAGA/madonna/katy perry/little mix/ariana grande/selena gomez/britney spears/taylor swift Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldenNovember 455 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 I haven't been to the Prismatic World Tour since I don't listen to Katy Perry. I wouldn't enjoy the show anyway, as I am drawn to female powerhouse vocalists. I can't enjoy shows where the performer is not capable of singing in tune most of the time, I just can't. This is not 'shade' towards Katy or anything, it's just my opinion that she is not a good vocalist. It's hard to light a candle, easy to curse the dark instead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HANZ 4,380 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 Yea, I have to agree. The artRave just completely lacked in stage production. I loved the stage and the setlist, but it was practically Gaga doing the same thing for every song. There wasn't much planning whereas the Prismatic Tour did.mte the stage is the same the entire show, nothing changes I'm gonna be honest and say that I ALWAYS skipped all the performances except the ones for ARTPOP, GUY, Venus, Gypsy and Applause the rest were meh My Favs = Lady Gaga, Janet Jackson, Ricky Martin, AKB48 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpusDiaboli666 199 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 I didn't wanna go to Katy at first because I thought I would hate it. But I absolutely loved it..I have never seen a better Show spectacle wise..Katy flying through the arena on baloons, walking on air, flying butterflies Even the one on her Head was moving it was fantastic..but it was just a fun show built around the fact that Katy can't Dance well and the singing was nothing of course Compared to Gaga..also the interaction with the crowd: barely existent. The artrave was a religios experience the best Party of my life and it meant something Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Kubrick 892 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 you can't hide lack of talent, charisma, stage presense and overall basicness even by the most expensive production in the world it makes things even worse when you realize all this money is wasted on someone as mediocre and unimpressive as Katy Perry True Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pain of fame1 229 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 Gaga clearly ****s on Katy in terms of talent, vocal ability, dancing, exc. Pristmatic ****s all over artRave in every way possible show production wise though. The artRave isn't even close to touching it in terms of show and production.sadly agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchyguy 249 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 Gaga clearly ****s on Katy in terms of talent, vocal ability, dancing, exc. Pristmatic ****s all over artRave in every way possible show production wise though. The artRave isn't even close to touching it in terms of show and production. I went to both shows and I have to agree. The crowd interaction and vocal talent of Gaga is wayyyy better than katy's. Her singing is one big joke.However the show production of the Prismatic tour was much better! Ur just more wowed by all the special effects. She plays only hits, so you know all the songs, and the production keeps suprising you.I hope Gaga's next tour will be more "wowing" :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 15,930 Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 the tour was flawless and you shall all deal, this b---h tried to make something that was a continuous party and fun without the need of storyline (although artRAVE actually does have one) and i went to both; one by myself and the other with my 8 y/o cousin & her mum and I enjoyed artRAVE so much more tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.