Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 HAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/6450959/rihanna-kanye-west-paul-mccartney-hot-100-fourfiveseconds Lol it's a new Rihanna's single.It will obviously have a good start Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo Freud 653 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 24 hours later, I still hate the song :toofloppy: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
7Days 7 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 A guy from atrl made this comparision with Diamonds. POP: 0 31 RIHANNA/KANYE WEST/P MCCARTNEY FourFiveSeconds 1940 0 1940 16.354 +4 positions + 632 spins + 5.128 audience RHYTHMIC: 0 47 RIHANNA/KANYE WEST/P MCCARTNEY FourFiveSeconds 412 0 412 3.968 Hot AC: 0 34 RIHANNA/KANYE WEST/P MCCARTNEY FourFiveSeconds 436 0 436 3.8 URBAN: 42 37 KANYE WEST Only One f/Paul McCartney 539 428 111 2.735 Overall Audience from the formats: 26.857 Comparison with Diamonds 2nd day. POP: Position: Diamonds - #33 (+4) | FourFive Seconds - #31 (+4) Audience: Diamonds - 16.207 (+2.478) | FourFive Seconds - 16.354 (+5.128) Spins: Diamonds - 1308 (+233) | FourFive Seconds - 1940 (+632) OVERALL: Spins: Diamonds - 1940 | FourFive Seconds - 3327 Audience: Diamonds - 20.230 | FourFive Seconds - 26.857 Rihanna can release a song with her snoring and still becoming a hit. Only the true Queen of Pop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jeans 3,815 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 This song is 100000x better than your faves generic mess lead singles aka Shake it Off. :lollipop: You have a generic mess on your avi so don't even (i'm not even a Taylor fan js) Destiny is for losers. It’s just a stupid excuse to wait for things to happen instead of making them happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlayedForTheGod 665 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Didn't Russian Roulette go number 1 on billboard? If that can idk why ya'll think this can't. It will suffice as the first single. Literally the last debut Rihanna single to have a huge impact was WFL. They might not all be huge in the long run but they will be big. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladygfangirl 0 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 She is a Goddess of light and Party and she slayed my p*ssy with this song Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiona Apple 13,006 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 This song is 100000x better than your faves generic mess lead singles aka Shake it Off. :lollipop: That's your opinion. I think that Shake it off is a lot better (even tho it's rediculously repetitive in the end) because it has a smart meaning and the melody is actually amazing and memorable.. This song might sound less "cheap" but it's definitely generic.It doesn't need to be a pop song to be generic.The melody is really NOTHING and the lyrics are ok. The only interesting on this song for me are her vocals Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris777 112 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Didn't Russian Roulette go number 1 on billboard? If that can idk why ya'll think this can't. It will suffice as the first single. Literally the last debut Rihanna single to have a huge impact was WFL. They might not all be huge in the long run but they will be big. No. RR peaked at #9 in the US Hot 100 and was completely ignored by US radio (peaked outside of the top 30 in that chart). WW it did very good tho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deagan 608 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Everything that Rihanna releases will be a smash. It's not her worldwide club smash, but I think it will catch on in some places. In some way I can imagine campfires and a group of people being like nanana four five seconds from wildin nana three more days til friday nana. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTbc2NeErnU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGj3BKZj248 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hell0samuel 59 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 really liking this song. although, hoping rih returns to her usual upbeat songs - but it's a nice change. edit - 3000th post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry 2,374 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 edit - 3000th post Yass congrats! :heart: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris777 112 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 That's your opinion. I think that Shake it off is a lot better (even tho it's rediculously repetitive in the end) because it has a smart meaning and the melody is actually amazing and memorable.. This song might sound less "cheap" but it's definitely generic.It doesn't need to be a pop song to be generic.The melody is really NOTHING and the lyrics are ok. The only interesting on this song for me are her vocals How can it be generic when it sounds like NOTHING on the top 40 right now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagadisiak 554 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 How can it be generic when it sounds like NOTHING on the top 40 right now. Ed sheeran do this kind of music . . . this kind of music is generic but more with male singers . Où est-tu ma Salope ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus 1,494 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 How can it be generic when it sounds like NOTHING on the top 40 right now. You're equating generic with top 40. Generic isn't anything top 40 because it's varying. This is simply an acoustic song. Nothing new. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Draco 2,531 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Is this song cultural appropriation of white people? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.