Jump to content

Should Gaga continue to get tattoos for albums?


Dorothy Gale

Featured Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
StrawberryBlond

No, it's a terrible idea. I don't mind her getting tattoos, as long as they're not too big or look bad. But she's already crossing over into meaningless tattoo territory (the RIO tattoo, the mouse with the needle, the monster paw). These were things that seemed good ideas at the time but now seem a bit pointless and random. As if she needed a monster paw after all this time, really? That's more like a tattoo you get at the beginning when you're all excited about how your fans are responding to something but nowadays, does the monster paw really mean anything? Gaga is clearly an artist that plans to make music forever, so I think it would be reckless to get a tattoo every time, every 2.5 years or so. She'll look a sight when she's elderly if that's the case. I don't want to see her with sleeves, a massive tattoo that she'll live to regret (Rihanna's Maori hand tattoo springs to mind) or even something on her beautiful face. She's perfect the way she is. Too many tattoos simply mar a person's body.

She doesn't need a permanent reminder on her body of an album. She's got them documented in history forever and she LIVED through them. Getting a tattoo of the event is just pointless to me. I'm sure that deep down, she regrets the ARTPOP one anyway. Who would want to be reminded of that messy era that nearly ruined her career? I mean, can you imagine if Xtina had a Bionic or Lotus tattoo? The question is, if she really starts flopping, like less than a million copies sold worldwide, will she stop getting tattoos of her albums because they don't really have relevance? At what point will she draw the line?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dorothy Gale

No, it's a terrible idea. I don't mind her getting tattoos, as long as they're not too big or look bad. But she's already crossing over into meaningless tattoo territory (the RIO tattoo, the mouse with the needle, the monster paw). These were things that seemed good ideas at the time but now seem a bit pointless and random. As if she needed a monster paw after all this time, really? That's more like a tattoo you get at the beginning when you're all excited about how your fans are responding to something but nowadays, does the monster paw really mean anything? Gaga is clearly an artist that plans to make music forever, so I think it would be reckless to get a tattoo every time, every 2.5 years or so. She'll look a sight when she's elderly if that's the case. I don't want to see her with sleeves, a massive tattoo that she'll live to regret (Rihanna's Maori hand tattoo springs to mind) or even something on her beautiful face. She's perfect the way she is. Too many tattoos simply mar a person's body.

She doesn't need a permanent reminder on her body of an album. She's got them documented in history forever and she LIVED through them. Getting a tattoo of the event is just pointless to me. I'm sure that deep down, she regrets the ARTPOP one anyway. Who would want to be reminded of that messy era that nearly ruined her career? I mean, can you imagine if Xtina had a Bionic or Lotus tattoo? The question is, if she really starts flopping, like less than a million copies sold worldwide, will she stop getting tattoos of her albums because they don't really have relevance? At what point will she draw the line?

This post! Don't put a bumper sticker on a Bentley.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dorothy Gale

When were you given permission to decide/judge for her? :bye:

 

God gave me the freedom to express my opinions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

uo111

She gets tattoos for things that are important or special to her. If you don't like it :ohwell:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...