Redstreak 6,653 Posted November 19, 2014 Author Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:38 PM, Disregard said: So basically it is meaningless, good to know. Yep, it just inflates everything so the industry looks better than it actually is. This new rule basically makes the BB 200 pointless. Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloody 64,631 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:38 PM, Disregard said: So basically it is meaningless, good to know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagamel 3,410 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:41 PM, idlest inuborg said: 1-9-9-1 my time has come oh na na ma your time is done yasss Watch Rihanna go #1 for 3 months Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBNLM 1,640 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 i think they do this to force labels to join streaming services? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rat Boy 42,563 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 This seems silly tbh :duck: "****ing rat" - @Dynamite Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Draco 2,531 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:44 PM, Mariano said: they won't and they could be less bothered by a meaningless chart. They cared enough about charts to take her music off of Spotify in hopes of better sales though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valextra 58 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:45 PM, Redstreak said: Yep, it just inflates everything so the industry looks better than it actually is. This new rule basically makes the BB 200 pointless. My exactly thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino 24,139 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 Can someone explain how this messy I think it's good that no matter what way people listen to music, it'd still count for the chart. Right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mariano 958 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:51 PM, codydraco said: They cared enough about charts to take her music off of Spotify in hopes of better sales though. charts? They care about the money, not charts. No matter if she sold 200/300/400/500/600/700/800k etc. she would be number 1 regardless. She sold 1.3M and she sold 400k+ and 300K+ in her second and 3rd week. Spotify had nothing to do with charts. They just wants their money (deservebly so). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Draco 2,531 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:43 PM, Harry said: Not entirely sure how I feel about this. I also don't really understand how the streaming part works. "SoundScan and Billboard will count 1,500 song streams from services like Spotify, Beats Music, Rdio, Rhapsody and Google Play as equivalent to an album sale." Does this mean 1500 streams of ANY song from the album counts as one song? So even if an album has a popular single but doesn't sell well - i.e. Ariana as mentioned in the article - it will remain high on the chart? Does that really reflect the popularity of the album though? Hmm... It wouldn't reflect the popularity of the album. They should only count the streams of the entire album (when someone streams the whole album from start to finish) if they are going to go through with this. That would require Spotify and other streaming site to record how many times someone listens to an album from start to finish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mariano 958 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:52 PM, Bambino said: Can someone explain how this messy I think it's good that no matter what way people listen to music, it'd still count for the chart. Right? yea but for example Katy Perry having Dark Horse and Roar being so popular can make her WHOLE album number 1. Which is not accurate, because people could care less about PRISM, they just listen to those 2 songs. Listening to the same song 10 times doesn't equal listening to 1 album, whereas BB make it look like it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Draco 2,531 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:53 PM, Mariano said: charts? They care about the money, not charts. No matter if she sold 200/300/400/500/600/700/800k etc. she would be number 1 regardless. She sold 1.3M and she sold 400k+ and 300K+ in her second and 3rd week. Spotify had nothing to do with charts. They just wants their money (deservebly so). Sales = charting better honey. Whether indirectly or directly they cared about the charts. Plus, labels care about charts because the higher you are on the charts the more exposed you are/the more the media talks about you and your music. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino 24,139 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 On 11/19/2014 at 10:54 PM, Mariano said: yea but for example Katy Perry having Dark Horse and Roar being so popular can make her WHOLE album number 1. Which is not accurate, because people could care less about PRISM, they just listen to those 2 songs. Listening to the same song 10 times doesn't equal listening to 1 album, whereas BB make it look like it. So this rule means that a song being listened to means the entire album doing well on charts? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,775 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 Great idea. They have to go on with the times. Because young people buy less albums than old people, the chart gets a little bit unfair at times - they, after all, have to make a chart that is representative of popularity, which cannot be viewed solely with album sales anymore. Not very profitable for Gaga's jazz project though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishmonster 11,002 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 But it is good for Gaga next Pop/rock album, no? buy stupid love on itunes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.