garnite 8 Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 She seems indeed very passionate. Here's an interview with her: http://content.time.com/time/video/player/0,32068,1875308404_1853517,00.html She admires Peter Singer. see, you can see she sees the humour in it too. it's funny. her interjection about gaga was funny. the silly peta mario/pokemon games are funny. of course she has a motive - she doesn't want people to use animals for entertainment. but as you can see in this interview she's much gentler than she seems, even advocating doing a single thing in favour of the animals simply because it means you're doing something kind. not as staunch as people assume. and peter singer is great about this subject. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sizzily 14,543 Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 PETA can go **** themselves :koons: Tears in the rain Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonna Lee 384 Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 I don't understand what y'alls problem with them is. They have a wonderful idealogy and mission and have done good thing for animal rights. Ingrid Newkirk seems like a very warm, congenial woman. But as she said in the article, she (and her organization) can be overbearing to say in the least. I agree that their methods can be rather... strange... and that they sometimes seem to care more about the spotlight and the animals. But please, don't rip them to shreds. They're an animal rights group. They're gonna exaggerate and use language that casts animal rights violators/"violators" (Gaga) in a bad light. i like it when u treat me mean it turns my mood from black to blue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy McQueen 4,484 Posted September 3, 2014 Author Share Posted September 3, 2014 see, you can see she sees the humour in it too. it's funny. her interjection about gaga was funny. the silly peta mario/pokemon games are funny. of course she has a motive - she doesn't want people to use animals for entertainment. but as you can see in this interview she's much gentler than she seems, even advocating doing a single thing in favour of the animals simply because it means you're doing something kind. not as staunch as people assume. and peter singer is great about this subject. I do agree. But: I just found this on the web and thought it was very interesting to read and also agree in many ways: http://gagadaily.com/index.php/topic/120340-regarding-peta-lets-discuss-etc-but-keep-it-classy-okay/ Guess it's always difficult to debate and philosophize about moral/animal ethics etc. ... I don't understand what y'alls problem with them is. They have a wonderful idealogy and mission and have done good thing for animal rights. Ingrid Newkirk seems like a very warm, congenial woman. But as she said in the article, she (and her organization) can be overbearing to say in the least. I agree that their methods can be rather... strange... and that they sometimes seem to care more about the spotlight and the animals. But please, don't rip them to shreds. They're an animal rights group. They're gonna exaggerate and use language that casts animal rights violators/"violators" (Gaga) in a bad light. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello Mr. Radio 45 Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 She looks like Bruce Jenner Wait :rip: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo 7,798 Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 mess Don't visit my profile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omegahedron 190 Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Why has this even been posted? I have absolutely zero time for a lunatic asylum like PETA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PinkBalloons 0 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Peta is bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloody Matt 5,357 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Peta doesnt even care about animals they are a money grabbing company. All they care about is to threaten big names like Pokemon and now Gaga. I highly doubt they do anything for animals in real danger. What did they say about Pokemon? :toofunny: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic 1,415 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 The jeweles on Asia thing is ridiculous, she's just pressed those jewels are worth more than PETA You think too human. Try to be on asia's place, was it pleasant for her? Who cares about price Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azor Ahai 18,861 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 What did they say about Pokemon? http://features.peta.org/pokemon-black-and-white-parody/ .... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
htrllllsem 14 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 You think too human. Try to be on asia's place, was it pleasant for her? Who cares about price Oh ****ing please, At least Asia isn't dying on the ****ing street like most dogs outside the US, Asia lives a better life than most of us. :later: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic 1,415 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Oh ****ing please, At least Asia isn't dying on the ****ing street like most dogs outside the US, Asia lives a better life than most of us. Thats wonderful she is not dying on street indeed! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.