Manul 7,377 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 How do y'all know if they are actually correct about this? it wasn't laaaahv Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JazzGa 14,565 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Ahhh nooo I was really hoping an updated version of Captivated would be on C2C 'cause I think I remember rumors a while ago that they re-did Captivated for the album. :nooo: That's ok, I've never been really into jazz or Broadway so all the songs will be new to me anyways My old cat is a tough man, but i cant deny the way he bites my hand and he stabs me, he grabs me by my heart <3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 I wonder why, maybe Gaga's too afraid to be judged for her Jazz abilities? I doubt it. Records such as this are usually comprised of standards, an array of artists over the years have covered these classics and now Gaga will be among them. Its kind of dumb to me that so many people in this thread are trying to act like they're getting ripped off or something. Not to give any of these annoying stereotypically tasteless pop stans some shred of hope, but who is to say Paradise isn't something shes now planning to put on her next solo record? Who is to say Paradise was ever actually intended to be on this record or isn't going to be in the end? Who is to say it wasn't very good so maybe it was scrapped? Honestly why does it have to be made into an issue? Like I said, its dumb and most of you would have only pretended to like it anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jjang 2,262 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 I doubt it. Records such as this are usually comprised of standards, an array of artists over the years have covered these classics and now Gaga will be among them. Its kind of dumb to me that so many people in this thread are trying to act like they're getting ripped off or something. Not to give any of these annoying stereotypically tasteless pop stans some shred of hope, but who is to say Paradise isn't something shes now planning to put on her next solo record? Who is to say Paradise was ever actually intended to be on this record or isn't going to be in the end? Who is to say it wasn't very good so maybe it was scrapped? Honestly why does it have to be made into an issue? Like I said, its dumb and most of you would have only pretended to like it anyway. The only one making it an issue is you. I just raised a question out of curiosity. Tony himself said it was supposed to be on the album. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 The only making it an issue is you. Nonsense. Have you not read the comments in this thread? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jjang 2,262 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Nonsense. Have you not read the comments in this thread? Am I obligated to? you quoted mine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Am I obligated to? you quoted mine. If you read mine and had any sort of comprehension skills you'd be able to differentiate what was directed towards you and what became a general statement regarding the attitudes in this thread. I directed no negativity towards you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jjang 2,262 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 If you read mine and had any sort of comprehension skills you'd be able to differentiate what was directed towards you and what became a general statement regarding the attitudes in this thread. I directed no negativity towards you. So you're basically implying that you were making a general point by using mine as an example? yet I fail to see how my post justified your argument or the point you were trying to make. And you do realize you just made an uncalled for rude comment in the first part of your post, yet in the second part you claimed you direct no negativity towards me? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 So you're basically implying that you were making a general point by using mine as an example? yet I fail to see how my post justified your argument or the point you were trying to make. And you do realize you just made an uncalled for rude comment the first part of your post, yet in the second part you claimed you direct to negativity towards me? No. I responded to yours, then proceeded to make a general statement about the attitudes in this thread. And thats because initially I didn't direct any negativity towards you, you got all pissy and took my response like it was an attack on you and it wasn't. Unless of course you feel that you share those negative opinions I was referring to and thats why you're taking my post personally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEANUS 13,496 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 This was reported multiple times for incorrect, age-ist flamebait. Don't say horridly offensive stuff like that. 1. Tony Bennett does not have this condition 2. This is prejudiced against people older than you are 3. If you are LUCKY, if any of us are LUCKY, we will reach his age. I would rather be old than dead, wouldn't you? Don't speak of older people so disrespectfully. It makes you look very childish and immature. CLOCK. HA. CHICA. British social ladies with upturned pinkies, glasses clinking // xoxoTEANUS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muh 144 Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 yet another betrayal Im just excited to hear Bang Bang Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.