Jump to content

If she had remained Stefani...


Shadow

Featured Posts

Paco

The name Lady Gaga is catchy and iconic. Unique too. And it intrigued people to search her

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Shadow

I think we can all realize it. I know many even more talented artists and they will probably never have commercial success.

I know. After the fact, we all know how unique and glorious her name is, if for nothing else, the sheer fact it was inspired by Radio Gaga by Queen! How many pop stars can say that? I was just thinking about stars like Adele, Lorde, and Katy Perry, and even Gwen Stefani, and wondered about her in that hypothetical situation.

🖤
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ambrosia

I think "Stefani" would have been fine - it's an easy enough name and the spelling is memorable.  If she was the same as she is now, what would be the difference?  A name doesn't mean a whole lot - it's the person not the name. 

Do not do to others what angers you if done to you by others. -Socrates
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ambrosia

What was interesting about Madonna, was she had a cool and unique name, and that really was her name.  It was memorable due to the fact the name was quite the opposite of her persona.  ;)

Do not do to others what angers you if done to you by others. -Socrates
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nemo

If she went by just "Stefani", I'd be annoyed with her, like I am with other artists whose single names are just too commonplace. (I can't think of any examples right now, but there are lots of them.) To me, if you're going to use just your given name, then your given name better be something as distinctive as "Cher", "Madonna", or "Prince".

And of course if she went by "Stefani Germanotta", everyone would complain that it was too long. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Laceface

The name Lady Gaga is catchy and iconic. Unique too. And it intrigued people to search her

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allison M

Rah rah ah ah ah, roma roma ma, ste-fah-ni ger-ma-notta, want your Bad Romance.

It just doesn't have the same ring to it tumblr_inline_n2g4lqRlX11qf3eh3.gif

:toofunny: I'm laughing way too hard at this post hahaha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sugarfall

Gaga makes her stand out, Stefani is a normal name and quite forgettable. Gaga is better and it works in songs better.

 

''Red Ooone, Stefaaaaniiii''

Link to post
Share on other sites

RyanBall

Stefani Germanotta is just a bit of a mouthful, and not as memorable in comparison to 'Lady Gaga'

Link to post
Share on other sites

giskardsb

She'd probably be a rockstar. Fronting an Atmospheric/Industrial hybrid metal band.  It would have been amazing.  :giveup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Miker

An introduction to flamboyance means eating cheerios and creating a shock value that may not have had the same impact if she was was known only as Stefani.  

 

tumblr_lvjsos47Pd1qm6231o1_5001.gif

Mars..........or bust!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sabertooth

She just created a catchy stage name. It has a ring to it, and its easy to remember. Her real first name just reminds of me Gwen Stefani  :toofunny:

Link to post
Share on other sites

PopReaper

Her work as Stefani is so different from her work as Lady Gaga, that I think labelling albums like The Fame or ARTPOP as a Stefani album would be kinda weird. The name changes helps to differentiate the phases of her work imo.

Fun Fact: The K in KPop stands for "Kate Bush"
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tropico

She would have the success of Robyn :flop:

A name does mean a great lot you know.

♢ Social Justice Enthusiast ♢
Link to post
Share on other sites

VforVendetta

It wouldn't be the same. With the name Lady Gaga a whole persona was born, persona that did things possible Stefani couldn't

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...