tomsches 16,960 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 What's so progressive about Applause though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opulence 1,146 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Ruined it by shading other artists :( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco 3,040 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 96,590 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 that last paragraph ruined it. (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ be delulu until it becomes trululu (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEVDALIZA 1,274 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 You can't really say it's true if it's an opinion and not an undeniable fact Philosophy, my dear But, although they have a point, they ruined everything by attempting to shade other artists in order to try to make Gaga seem better. That's just as weak as it gets. operating from another world Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essence 148 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 That's awesome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
degenerate 443 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 yess scott he's amazing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco 3,040 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 and he had to shade other artists :roll: All I see is true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
popper 3 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 The shading was unnecessary but he/she has a point on the discounts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yourfaves 317 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 awww c'mon. There are some true points AND the person is obvious a fan, but I don't think its THAT impartial. They are a fan and they're shading other artists. It's the definition of impartial. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroubleClef 0 Posted May 1, 2014 Author Share Posted May 1, 2014 obviously opinions are opinions. and the truth is in how you interpret them. But I think its a good point. Maybe other artists shouldn't have been shaded the way that it was done. I agree... It would have been better, stronger, if Katy perry wasn't mentioned by name. The current state of the music industry is a bit pathetic though. The tactics that are used to get your album/song #1...; whether its good or not is irrelevant. But thats just my Opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMXIX 51 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 :trootea: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zilla 13,343 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Didn't need counter shade..... 𝙸'𝚖 𝚊 𝚓𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚓𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bye 3,947 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 So what if it's shade. Shade doesn't have to be false or lies, and I only see the truth here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toph 374 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 What's so progressive about Applause though? lol this, the whole bit about "as basic as Roar or progressive as Applause" made me laugh. There's nothing progressive about Applause. Otherwise I think the little blurb was on the spot. Did whomever write this have to throw shade in at other artists? It really ruins credibility. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.